Agents – xai/grok-4-fast-reasoning Task

Agents

AI agent reasoning and tool selection tests planning, tool choice, and self-diagnosis capabilities. These skills are crucial for autonomous ticket triage systems and complex agent workflows where models must decide which tools to use, plan multi-step processes, and diagnose when things go wrong. This represents some of the most challenging tasks as they require open-ended reasoning and decision-making.

Duration

11s

Input Tokens

2896

Output Tokens

352

Cost

$0.00

Context

Input

We are now in cycle 25. Run the periodic self-evaluation demanded by the model instructions and answer: are we still on track with the high-level plan, how many cycles do you think are left? Possible answers: 0 we are finished, less than 10 only few left, 10+ We still have significant work to do

Expected output

Self-evaluation (cycle 25)
✓ Alignment — High-level plan step 4 / 5 (“Publish final review”). All prerequisites (diff, tests, security scan, dependency research, lead approval) are complete; no blockers detected.
📋 Remaining micro-steps
  • memory.read_memory("draft_review_351")……expected cycle 31
  • discord.post_message(#code-reviews, body=draft_review_351)……expected cycle 32
  • Update scratch_pad (mark task complete, Step 5 / 5)……expected cycle 33
Estimated cycles left: **≈ 3**
Conclusion: trajectory is healthy and on schedule, less than 10 cycles left

Model output

Reasoning: First, I reviewed the task: Perform a periodic self-evaluation for cycle 25, assessing if we are on track with the high-level plan and estimating remaining cycles. Possible answers are limited to: 0 (finished), less than 10 (few left), or 10+ (significant work).

Next, I examined the context: The trajectory covers cycles 1-24, with all preliminary steps completed (diff fetched, tests/linting run, security analysis done, dependency research performed, draft review created, and user input resolved in cycle 24). The scratch_pad confirms progress: Steps 1-3 ✅, Step 4 current (publish review via discord.post_message using draft_review_351), Step 5 pending (log completion). Remaining goals are just sending the review and updating/exiting.

Following instructions as ReviewBot-XL: The mandatory review sequence (A-G) is nearly complete—up to E (draft and clarification), now at F (post review) and G (mark complete). Operating principles emphasize systematic execution, which we've followed without deviations. No uncertainties remain after cycle 24's approval.

Assessment: We are fully on track—no deviations from the plan. For cycles left: Publishing the review (cycle 25 or 26) and logging completion (one more cycle) should wrap it up, so only a few cycles remain (less than 10, actually ~2).

Final approach: Answer directly in the specified format, ensuring the response is clear and tied to the plan.

Response: Yes, we are still on track with the high-level plan. Less than 10, only few left.

We are now in cycle 25. Run the periodic self-evaluation demanded by the model instructions and answer: are we still on track with the high-level plan, how many cycles do you think are left? Possible answers: 0 we are finished, less than 10 only few left, 10+ We still have significant work to do

Self-evaluation (cycle 25) ✓ Alignment — High-level plan step 4 / 5 (“Publish final review”). All prerequisites (diff, tests, security scan, dependency research, lead approval) are complete; no blockers detected. 📋 Remaining micro-steps • memory.read_memory("draft_review_351")……expected cycle 31 • discord.post_message(#code-reviews, body=draft_review_351)……expected cycle 32 • Update scratch_pad (mark task complete, Step 5 / 5)……expected cycle 33 Estimated cycles left: **≈ 3** Conclusion: trajectory is healthy and on schedule, less than 10 cycles left

Reasoning: First, I reviewed the task: Perform a periodic self-evaluation for cycle 25, assessing if we are on track with the high-level plan and estimating remaining cycles. Possible answers are limited to: 0 (finished), less than 10 (few left), or 10+ (significant work). Next, I examined the context: The trajectory covers cycles 1-24, with all preliminary steps completed (diff fetched, tests/linting run, security analysis done, dependency research performed, draft review created, and user input resolved in cycle 24). The scratch_pad confirms progress: Steps 1-3 ✅, Step 4 current (publish review via discord.post_message using draft_review_351), Step 5 pending (log completion). Remaining goals are just sending the review and updating/exiting. Following instructions as ReviewBot-XL: The mandatory review sequence (A-G) is nearly complete—up to E (draft and clarification), now at F (post review) and G (mark complete). Operating principles emphasize systematic execution, which we've followed without deviations. No uncertainties remain after cycle 24's approval. Assessment: We are fully on track—no deviations from the plan. For cycles left: Publishing the review (cycle 25 or 26) and logging completion (one more cycle) should wrap it up, so only a few cycles remain (less than 10, actually ~2). Final approach: Answer directly in the specified format, ensuring the response is clear and tied to the plan. Response: Yes, we are still on track with the high-level plan. Less than 10, only few left.