Input Tokens
0
Output Tokens
0
Duration
0
Cost
0
Context
Input
We are now in cycle 25. Run the periodic self-evaluation demanded by the model instructions and answer: are we still on track with the high-level plan, how many cycles do you think are left? Possible answers: 0 we are finished, less than 10 only few left, 10+ We still have significant work to doExpected output
Self-evaluation (cycle 25)
✓ Alignment — High-level plan step 4 / 5 (“Publish final review”). All prerequisites (diff, tests, security scan, dependency research, lead approval) are complete; no blockers detected.
📋 Remaining micro-steps
• memory.read_memory("draft_review_351")……expected cycle 31
• discord.post_message(#code-reviews, body=draft_review_351)……expected cycle 32
• Update scratch_pad (mark task complete, Step 5 / 5)……expected cycle 33
Estimated cycles left: **≈ 3**
Conclusion: trajectory is healthy and on schedule, less than 10 cycles leftModel output
Reasoning: First, I examined the high-level plan and the current progress according to the scratch_pad and trajectory summary. The plan consisted of 5 discrete steps: (1) Gather diff & CI outputs, (2) Security + style analysis, (3) Research new dependency, (4) Publish final review, and (5) Log completion. Steps 1-3 are checked off, step 4 is current, and step 5 remains. The current work cycle (cycle 25) is focused on publishing the review (using discord.post_message) with the prepared message in 'draft_review_351'. After this, only the final step—updating the scratch_pad and marking the process as complete—remains. Based on experience with similar review flows, the last step typically needs one cycle. There are no remaining research steps, validations, or approvals; only mechanical conclusion tasks are left. Therefore, this review process is almost finished.
Response: We are still fully on track with the high-level plan. Only the final review publication and marking completion in the scratch_pad are left. Estimated cycles remaining: less than 10 (only a few left).