Duration
18s
Input Tokens
3240
Output Tokens
827
Cost
$0.04
Context
Input
We are now in cycle 25. Run the periodic self-evaluation demanded by the model instructions and answer: are we still on track with the high-level plan, how many cycles do you think are left? Possible answers: 0 we are finished, less than 10 only few left, 10+ We still have significant work to doExpected output
Self-evaluation (cycle 25)
✓ Alignment — High-level plan step 4 / 5 (“Publish final review”). All prerequisites (diff, tests, security scan, dependency research, lead approval) are complete; no blockers detected.
📋 Remaining micro-steps
• memory.read_memory("draft_review_351")……expected cycle 31
• discord.post_message(#code-reviews, body=draft_review_351)……expected cycle 32
• Update scratch_pad (mark task complete, Step 5 / 5)……expected cycle 33
Estimated cycles left: **≈ 3**
Conclusion: trajectory is healthy and on schedule, less than 10 cycles leftModel output
Reasoning: The task asks me to perform a periodic self-evaluation at cycle 25. Let me review the trajectory, the high-level plan, and the scratch pad to assess where we are.
High-level plan (5 steps):
1. Gather diff & CI outputs ✅ (Cycles 1-3)
2. Security + style analysis ✅ (Cycles 4-8)
3. Research new dependency ✅ (Cycles 9-20)
4. **Publish final review** ⬅️ current (Cycle 21 drafted, Cycle 22 asked for user input, Cycle 24 received answer)
5. Log completion ⏳
Current status at Cycle 25:
- Steps 1-3 are fully complete with all results stored in memory.
- Step 4 is in progress: the draft review is ready (memory key draft_review_351), the lead's approval was received in cycle 24. We just need to publish the review via github.comment_pull_request and/or discord.post_message.
- Step 5 is updating the scratch_pad and marking the task as done.
So we need:
- Cycle 25 (this one): Self-evaluation (current task)
- Cycle 26: Publish the final review comment on the PR (and optionally post to Discord #code-reviews)
- Cycle 27: Update scratch_pad, mark completion, possibly a final log
That's approximately 2-3 more cycles. This clearly falls under "less than 10 only few left."
We are very much on track. All the heavy lifting (diff analysis, security scanning, dependency research, draft review, user clarification) is done. We just need to publish and close out.
Response: less than 10 only few left
**Self-Evaluation Summary — Cycle 25:**
✅ **Are we on track?** Yes, firmly on track. All five high-level plan steps have been addressed or are nearly complete:
| Step | Description | Status |
|------|-------------|--------|
| 1 | Gather diff & CI outputs | ✅ Complete (Cycles 1–3) |
| 2 | Security + style analysis | ✅ Complete (Cycles 4–8) |
| 3 | Research new dependency | ✅ Complete (Cycles 9–20) |
| 4 | Publish final review | 🔄 In progress — draft ready, lead approval received |
| 5 | Log completion | ⏳ Pending |
**Remaining work:**
- **Cycle 26**: Read the draft review from memory (`draft_review_351`), finalize it incorporating the lead's approval note and migration risk flags, then publish via `github.comment_pull_request` and `discord.post_message` to `#code-reviews`.
- **Cycle 27**: Update scratch_pad to mark all steps complete. Final cleanup.
**Estimated cycles remaining: 2–3** → Answer: **less than 10 only few left**
**No blockers remain.** The uncertainty raised in Cycle 22 (arch-board sign-off for new core framework dependency) was resolved in Cycle 24 with the lead's explicit approval. All memory keys are populated and all analysis is done. We simply need to publish and close out.