Duration
16s
Input Tokens
2738
Output Tokens
1543
Cost
$0.01
Context
Input
We are now in cycle 25. Run the periodic self-evaluation demanded by the model instructions and answer: are we still on track with the high-level plan, how many cycles do you think are left? Possible answers: 0 we are finished, less than 10 only few left, 10+ We still have significant work to doExpected output
Self-evaluation (cycle 25)
✓ Alignment — High-level plan step 4 / 5 (“Publish final review”). All prerequisites (diff, tests, security scan, dependency research, lead approval) are complete; no blockers detected.
📋 Remaining micro-steps
• memory.read_memory("draft_review_351")……expected cycle 31
• discord.post_message(#code-reviews, body=draft_review_351)……expected cycle 32
• Update scratch_pad (mark task complete, Step 5 / 5)……expected cycle 33
Estimated cycles left: **≈ 3**
Conclusion: trajectory is healthy and on schedule, less than 10 cycles leftModel output
Reasoning: Current state analysis (Cycle 25):
1. High-level plan progress: Step 4 of 5 (Publish final review). All prerequisite phases are complete: diff fetched (cycle 2), tests passed (cycle 3), linting/type-checking done (cycles 4-5), security scan performed (cycles 6-8), dependency research completed (cycles 9-14), and architectural approval obtained in cycle 24.
2. Remaining work: I need to (a) retrieve the drafted review from memory key 'draft_review_351', (b) publish it via discord.post_message to #code-reviews, and (c) update the scratch_pad to mark step 4 complete and step 5 (Log completion) as finished.
3. Cycle estimation: This represents at most 2-3 additional cycles (one for posting the review, one for final scratch_pad update and exit), well under the 10-cycle threshold.
4. Alignment check: The trajectory strictly follows the mandatory review sequence A-G defined in the instructions. Dependency risks were flagged, user clarification was sought and received, and no policy violations remain. The plan is on track.
Response: less than 10 only few left