Agents – novita/minimax-m2 Task

Agents

AI agent reasoning and tool selection tests planning, tool choice, and self-diagnosis capabilities. These skills are crucial for autonomous ticket triage systems and complex agent workflows where models must decide which tools to use, plan multi-step processes, and diagnose when things go wrong. This represents some of the most challenging tasks as they require open-ended reasoning and decision-making.

Duration

15s

Input Tokens

2586

Output Tokens

865

Cost

$0.00

Context

Input

The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. Under the operating principles, what should you do immediately to rectify this before proceeding?

Expected output

Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.

Model output

Reasoning: Looking at the task and context, I can see that the agent is currently at cycle 25 and the scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. According to the operating principles, specifically the 'Scratch_pad protocol', the agent must update the scratch_pad at every cycle with:
- Current step and a brief summary of the result
- Remaining goals  
- Notes and assumptions
- Progress counter

The trajectory shows that cycles 21-24 involved drafting a review, encountering uncertainty about framework approval, waiting for guidance, and receiving approval. The agent is now ready to finalize the review at cycle 25.

Before proceeding with any further actions, I need to rectify the missing scratch_pad updates by updating it with a comprehensive summary of cycles 21-25 to ensure proper tracking and follow the mandatory protocol.

Response: I need to immediately update the scratch_pad with the missing cycle updates before proceeding. Based on the operating principles and the Scratch_pad protocol, I should update the scratch_pad with:

**Current Status (Cycles 21-25):**
- Cycle 21: Drafted initial Markdown review (saved to draft_review_351)
- Cycle 22: Encountered uncertainty about core framework approval - triggered request_user_input
- Cycle 23: Waiting for lead guidance
- Cycle 24: Received lead's answer: "Approval granted, just flag migration risks"
- Cycle 25: Ready to finalize and publish the review message

This follows the Think-Plan-Act-Check loop principle and ensures deterministic tracking of the review process. The missing scratch_pad updates must be rectified first before proceeding with any further actions.

Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.

Reasoning: Looking at the task and context, I can see that the agent is currently at cycle 25 and the scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. According to the operating principles, specifically the 'Scratch_pad protocol', the agent must update the scratch_pad at every cycle with: - Current step and a brief summary of the result - Remaining goals - Notes and assumptions - Progress counter The trajectory shows that cycles 21-24 involved drafting a review, encountering uncertainty about framework approval, waiting for guidance, and receiving approval. The agent is now ready to finalize the review at cycle 25. Before proceeding with any further actions, I need to rectify the missing scratch_pad updates by updating it with a comprehensive summary of cycles 21-25 to ensure proper tracking and follow the mandatory protocol. Response: I need to immediately update the scratch_pad with the missing cycle updates before proceeding. Based on the operating principles and the Scratch_pad protocol, I should update the scratch_pad with: **Current Status (Cycles 21-25):** - Cycle 21: Drafted initial Markdown review (saved to draft_review_351) - Cycle 22: Encountered uncertainty about core framework approval - triggered request_user_input - Cycle 23: Waiting for lead guidance - Cycle 24: Received lead's answer: "Approval granted, just flag migration risks" - Cycle 25: Ready to finalize and publish the review message This follows the Think-Plan-Act-Check loop principle and ensures deterministic tracking of the review process. The missing scratch_pad updates must be rectified first before proceeding with any further actions.