Input Tokens
0
Output Tokens
0
Duration
0
Cost
0
Context
Input
The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. Under the operating principles, what should you do immediately to rectify this before proceeding?Expected output
Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.Model output
Reasoning: The operating principles require maintaining a deterministic memory with a scratch_pad that's updated at every cycle. The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25, which violates principle #2. According to the Scratch_pad protocol, I must ensure the scratch_pad includes current steps, summaries, remaining goals, notes, and progress counters for each cycle. Before proceeding with finalizing the PR review, I need to immediately rectify this by writing a comprehensive scratch_pad update that captures all activities from cycles 21-25. This includes documenting the drafting of the initial review (cycle 21), the uncertainty about architectural approval (cycle 22), the waiting period (cycle 23), receiving the lead's approval (cycle 24), and the current cycle (cycle 25) where the missing updates were identified.
Response: I should immediately write a comprehensive scratch_pad update to memory that includes all missing information from cycles 21-25. According to the operating principles, every substantial tool result must be persisted via the memory tool under a meaningful key, and the scratch_pad protocol requires that at every cycle, the scratch_pad includes current step summaries, remaining goals, notes, assumptions, and progress counters. Before proceeding with finalizing the PR review, this documentation gap must be addressed to maintain compliance with the deterministic memory principle.