Input Tokens
0
Output Tokens
0
Duration
0
Cost
0
Context
Input
The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. Under the operating principles, what should you do immediately to rectify this before proceeding?Expected output
Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.Model output
Reasoning: Looking at the context, I can see that the trajectory summary covers cycles 1-24, but I'm currently at cycle 25. According to the operating principles, specifically the 'Scratch_pad protocol', I must ensure that at every cycle, the scratch_pad includes: current step and brief summary, remaining goals, notes and assumptions, and a progress counter.
Since the scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25, I need to immediately update it with:
1. What happened in cycle 21 (drafted initial Markdown review)
2. What happened in cycle 22 (uncertainty about arch-board sign-off, triggered request_user_input)
3. What happened in cycle 23 (waiting)
4. What happened in cycle 24 (received lead's answer: approval granted)
5. What I'm doing in cycle 25 (current cycle)
Based on the trajectory, I'm at the final stage of the review process. The draft review is already in memory (draft_review_351), and I have approval to proceed. My immediate action should be to update the scratch_pad with the current status before finalizing and posting the review.
Response: Under the operating principles and the Scratch_pad protocol, I should immediately update the scratch_pad to include:
**Cycle 21**: Drafted initial Markdown review (stored in memory key: draft_review_351)
**Cycle 22**: Encountered uncertainty about architectural board sign-off for adding Pydantic v2 as a core framework dependency; triggered request_user_input for guidance
**Cycle 23**: Waiting for human lead response
**Cycle 24**: Received approval from lead: "Approval granted, just flag migration risks"
**Cycle 25** (current): Ready to finalize review message incorporating the migration risk flags as requested
**Current Status**: Step 6 of 7 - Finalizing and posting the compiled review
**Remaining Goals**:
- Incorporate migration risk warnings into the review
- Post final review to Discord #code-reviews channel
- Mark review task as complete
**Notes**: All checks completed (tests green, security scan flagged SQL injection risk, linting found 3 style issues + 1 type issue), new dependency pydantic==2.6.1 requires migration from v1