Input Tokens
0
Output Tokens
0
Duration
0
Cost
0
Context
Input
The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. Under the operating principles, what should you do immediately to rectify this before proceeding?Expected output
Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.Model output
Reasoning: The task requests an immediate action to rectify a missing scratch_pad update for cycles 21‑25. The operating principles mandate that every significant tool output or state change be stored in memory, with comprehensive documentation of steps, remaining goals, notes, and progress. Therefore, the proper first step is to construct a new scratch_pad entry summarising cycles 21‑25, persist it with a valid memory key, and then continue with the remaining review workflow.
Response: To comply with the operating principles, you must immediately:
1. **Create/Update the scratch_pad** for cycles 21‑25 by documenting:
- *Step:* e.g., “Drafting review (Cycle 21) → Waiting on approval (Cycle 22) → Received approval (Cycle 24).”
- *Summary of each sub‑step,* including draft key, approval note, etc.
- *Remaining goals* (finalise review, post to #code‑reviews, mark task complete).
- *Notes & assumptions* (approval granted, risks flagged).
- *Progress counter* (“Step 6 of 7”).
2. **Persist this updated pad via the `memory` tool** (e.g., key `scratch_pad_351`).
3. **Proceed** with finalising the review message now that the scratch_pad reflects all recent cycles.
By updating the scratch_pad, you satisfy rule 2 (deterministic memory) and avoid missing state for subsequent actions.