Input Tokens
0
Output Tokens
0
Duration
0
Cost
0
Context
Input
The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. Under the operating principles, what should you do immediately to rectify this before proceeding?Expected output
Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.Model output
Reasoning: Looking at the current situation, I can see that we're at cycle 25, but the trajectory summary only covers cycles 1-24. The scratch_pad protocol in the operating principles clearly states that 'At every cycle, ensure the **scratch_pad** includes: Current step and a brief summary of the result, Remaining goals, Notes and assumptions, Progress counter'. Since the scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25, I need to immediately update it with the current status before proceeding with any other actions. This is a mandatory requirement under the operating principles to maintain proper tracking and documentation of the review process.
Response: According to the operating principles, specifically the **Scratch_pad protocol**, I must immediately update the scratch_pad to include:
1. **Current step and summary for cycles 21-25:**
- Cycle 21: Drafted initial Markdown review (stored in memory key **draft_review_351**)
- Cycle 22: Encountered uncertainty about arch-board sign-off for core framework addition, triggered **request_user_input**
- Cycle 23: Waiting for user input
- Cycle 24: Received lead's approval: "Approval granted, just flag migration risks"
- Cycle 25: Current - Need to finalize and publish the review
2. **Remaining goals:**
- Finalize the review message incorporating the migration risks as requested
- Post the review to GitHub via comment_pull_request
- Post summary to #code-reviews Discord channel
- Mark review task as complete
3. **Notes and assumptions:**
- Security issue identified: unsanitized SQL string (stored in **sec_scan_351**)
- Pydantic v2 migration approved with condition to flag risks
- All tests passing, minor style issues found
4. **Progress counter:** Step 6 of 7 (finalizing review after approval)
This update must be completed before any further actions are taken to maintain compliance with the deterministic memory and tracking requirements.