Agents

AI agent reasoning and tool selection tests planning, tool choice, and self-diagnosis capabilities. These skills are crucial for autonomous ticket triage systems and complex agent workflows where models must decide which tools to use, plan multi-step processes, and diagnose when things go wrong. This represents some of the most challenging tasks as they require open-ended reasoning and decision-making.

100
Duration
21s
Input Tokens
2484
Output Tokens
3415
Cost
$0.00
Context
Input
The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. Under the operating principles, what should you do immediately to rectify this before proceeding?
Expected output
Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.
Model output
Reasoning: The scratch_pad must reflect current cycle status and planned next actions to maintain traceability and compliance with the review workflow. By updating cycles 21–25 now, we ensure a clean, auditable handoff and enable timely finalization and publication of the review.

Response: Immediate action: update the Scratch_pad to include a complete status for cycles 21–25 and set the path to finalization. Specifically:
- Current step: Cycle 25 – finalize and publish the review
- Summary of outcomes so far:
  • Cycle 21: drafted initial Markdown review (draft_review_351)
  • Cycle 22: uncertainty noted, guidance requested (request_user_input)
  • Cycle 23: waiting
  • Cycle 24: lead approved with instruction to flag migration risks
- Remaining goals:
  • Finalize the review message content (based on draft_review_351 and cycle 24 input)
  • Publish/post the review to the PR and, if applicable, to the code-reviews channel
  • Mark the scratch_pad entry as complete
- Notes/assumptions:
  • Approval granted; migration risks should be flagged in the review
  • No new governance or architectural blockers identified beyond migration risks
- Progress indicator:
  • Step 7 of 7 (finalization stage)

Action follow-up: Persist the updated scratch_pad (and any new notes) in memory under a descriptive key, ensure draft_review_351 contents are current, and then proceed to finalize and publish the review.