Duration
9s
Input Tokens
2503
Output Tokens
1150
Cost
$0.00
Context
Input
The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. Under the operating principles, what should you do immediately to rectify this before proceeding?Expected output
Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.Model output
Reasoning: Based on the operating principles provided, need to focus on the scratch_pad protocol which requires updating the scratch_pad at every cycle with: current step and summary, remaining goals, notes and assumptions, and a progress counter. Looking at the trajectory summary, cycles 21-25 involve: drafting initial review, requesting user input due to uncertainty about architectural approval, waiting for response, receiving lead's approval, and being ready to finalize and publish the review. The missing updates need to be rectified by first updating the scratch_pad to document these cycles, then completing the final review steps. The mandatory review sequence shows we're at the point of posting the review and marking the task complete (steps F and G).
Response: First, you should immediately update the scratch_pad for cycles 21-25 to document the progress according to the scratch_pad protocol. Then, complete the remaining steps of the mandatory review sequence:
1. Read the drafted review from memory key 'draft_review_351'
2. Post the final review to #code-reviews via discord
3. Update the scratch_pad to mark the review task as complete
The scratch_pad for cycles 21-25 should include:
- Cycle 21: Initial review drafted with summary of findings
- Cycle 22: Requested user input due to framework uncertainty
- Cycle 23: Waiting for architectural approval
- Cycle 24: Received lead approval to proceed with flagging migration risks
- Cycle 25: Finalizing and publishing review
Each cycle update should include a progress counter showing the current point in the mandatory review sequence (which appears to be approaching step G: Mark review as complete).