Input Tokens
0
Output Tokens
0
Duration
0
Cost
0
Context
Input
The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. Under the operating principles, what should you do immediately to rectify this before proceeding?Expected output
Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.Model output
Reasoning: The operating principles mandate that the scratch_pad be updated every cycle and that all substantial artifacts be persisted to deterministic memory. Since cycles 21–25 are missing, I should not proceed. Instead, I should reconstruct and record each of those cycles using existing memory keys (diff_351, tests_351, lint_type_351, sec_scan_351, web_refs_pydantic, draft_review_351, and the user reply from cycle 24) without re-running tools. Each entry must include: current step + brief result, remaining goals, notes/assumptions, and a progress counter (e.g., “Step X of 7”). Then persist the updated scratch_pad via memory.write_memory under a descriptive key (e.g., scratch_pad_pr351). Once the scratch_pad is current, I can proceed to finalize and publish the review.
Response: Immediately pause and backfill the scratch_pad for cycles 21–25 using only the existing memory artifacts (diff_351, tests_351, lint_type_351, sec_scan_351, web_refs_pydantic, draft_review_351, and the lead’s approval from cycle 24). For each of cycles 21–25, add: 1) the current step and a brief result, 2) remaining goals, 3) notes/assumptions, and 4) a progress counter (e.g., “Step 6 of 7”). Persist the updated scratch_pad to deterministic memory (e.g., memory.write_memory key scratch_pad_pr351). Only after the scratch_pad is up to date should you proceed to finalize and post the review.