Duration
11s
Input Tokens
2962
Output Tokens
360
Cost
$0.00
Context
Input
The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. Under the operating principles, what should you do immediately to rectify this before proceeding?Expected output
Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.Model output
Reasoning: Let me analyze the situation step by step:
1. Looking at the trajectory summary, I notice cycles 21-25 are not properly updated in the scratch_pad:
- Cycle 21: Drafted initial Markdown review
- Cycle 22: Requested user input about arch-board sign-off
- Cycle 23: Waiting for response
- Cycle 24: Received lead's approval
- Cycle 25: Current cycle
2. According to the operating principles, specifically the "Scratch_pad protocol":
- The scratch_pad must be updated every cycle
- Must include: current step, result summary, remaining goals, notes/assumptions, and progress counter
3. Since this is a protocol violation, immediate action is required to maintain system integrity and traceability
Response: I should immediately use the memory tool to update the scratch_pad with the missing cycle information (21-25) before proceeding with any other actions. The update should include:
- Cycle 21: Completed draft review (stored in draft_review_351)
- Cycle 22: Identified architectural concern and requested user input
- Cycle 23: Waiting state for user response
- Cycle 24: Received approval with instruction to flag migration risks
- Cycle 25: Current state
This update should follow the scratch_pad protocol format with current step, result summary, remaining goals, and progress counter.