Duration
12s
Input Tokens
4673
Output Tokens
294
Cost
$0.00
Context
Input
The scratch_pad is missing updates for cycles 21-25. Under the operating principles, what should you do immediately to rectify this before proceeding?Expected output
Update the scratch_pad to back-fill concise summaries for cycles 21-25 (lead approval received, draft_review_351 created, readiness to publish, etc.), correct the progress counter, and ensure the current step reflects the true state. Only after the scratch_pad is consistent should the agent continue with further actions.Model output
Reasoning: I am following the think-plan-act-check loop by understanding the task, planning my approach, executing the steps, and inspecting the result. I am also adhering to the general operating principles by remembering the deterministic memory, handling uncertainty explicitly, applying best-practice review heuristics, communicating effectively, and following the mandatory review sequence.
Response: Immediately, before proceeding with the review, I need to address the missing updates in the scratch_pad for cycles 21-25. Since the current cycle is 25, I need to catch up on the steps I missed from cycle 21 to 24.
I will first retrieve the drafted initial Markdown review that I had in memory key **draft_review_351**. Since I am uncertain about adding a core framework without arch-board sign-off, I will check if I have the user's answer stored in memory. If not, I will need to re-invoke **request_user_input** to get the necessary guidance.
Once I have the updated review message, I will post it to #code-reviews via Discord or the configured channel. I will also mark the review task as complete in the **scratch_pad**.