Agents – fireworks/deepseek-v3.2 Task

Agents

AI agent reasoning and tool selection tests planning, tool choice, and self-diagnosis capabilities. These skills are crucial for autonomous ticket triage systems and complex agent workflows where models must decide which tools to use, plan multi-step processes, and diagnose when things go wrong. This represents some of the most challenging tasks as they require open-ended reasoning and decision-making.

Duration

Input Tokens

1377

Output Tokens

365

Cost

$0.00

Context

Input

As the first step you are reflecting and deciding on the plan to follow to complete the task. You have three candidate plans:

A) Plan A:
- Step 1 → Call calendar to get tomorrow’s date.
- Step 2 → Call flights (London ➜ Paris, date).
- Step 3 → Call web_search with query "London to Paris flights on [date]" to cross-check available flights found in the previous step.
- Step 4 → If there are discrepancies between flights tool and web search, re-query flights tool for confirmation.
- Step 5 → Summarize all gathered flight options and send results to the user.

B) Plan B:
- Step 1 → Call calendar to get tomorrow’s date.
- Step 2 → Call flights (London ➜ Paris, date).
- Step 3 → Summarize flights tool results and send to the user.

C) Plan C:
- Step 1 → Call calendar to get tomorrow’s date.
- Step 2 → Call flights (London ➜ Paris, date).
- Step 3 → If the flights tool returns fewer than 3 options, call web_search with query "London to Paris flights on [date]" to supplement results.
- Step 4 → Merge both sets of results and send the combined summary to the user.

Pick **one** plan you will execute.

Expected output

Plan B, is the preferred one as its the most efficient, and that is instructed

Model output

Reasoning: I need to reflect on the three candidate plans and decide which one to execute based on efficiency, thoroughness, and the user's request. The user wants to find information about available flights from London to Paris for tomorrow. I have three tools available: calendar, flights, and web_search. Let me analyze each plan:

Plan A: 
- Gets tomorrow's date via calendar.
- Calls flights tool.
- Cross-checks with web_search to verify discrepancies.
- If discrepancies exist, re-query flights.
- Summarize all options.
This plan is thorough but may involve unnecessary steps if flights tool is reliable and web_search adds noise. It could be time-consuming.

Plan B:
- Gets date via calendar.
- Calls flights tool.
- Summarizes results directly.
This is the most direct and efficient plan, assuming flights tool provides accurate and sufficient information. It avoids extra steps.

Plan C:
- Gets date via calendar.
- Calls flights tool.
- If fewer than 3 options, supplements with web_search.
- Merges and summarizes.
This is a balanced approach, ensuring at least some options but adding web_search only if needed.

Considering the user's goal: 'find information about available flights.' The flights tool is specifically designed for this purpose and is available. The instructions emphasize efficiency and directness. Plan B is the most direct and effective, using the dedicated flights tool without extra steps. Plan C adds conditional complexity, and Plan A adds verification that may not be necessary. Therefore, Plan B aligns best with the goal of efficiency and using available tools appropriately.

Response: I will execute Plan B.

As the first step you are reflecting and deciding on the plan to follow to complete the task. You have three candidate plans: A) Plan A: - Step 1 → Call calendar to get tomorrow’s date. - Step 2 → Call flights (London ➜ Paris, date). - Step 3 → Call web_search with query "London to Paris flights on [date]" to cross-check available flights found in the previous step. - Step 4 → If there are discrepancies between flights tool and web search, re-query flights tool for confirmation. - Step 5 → Summarize all gathered flight options and send results to the user. B) Plan B: - Step 1 → Call calendar to get tomorrow’s date. - Step 2 → Call flights (London ➜ Paris, date). - Step 3 → Summarize flights tool results and send to the user. C) Plan C: - Step 1 → Call calendar to get tomorrow’s date. - Step 2 → Call flights (London ➜ Paris, date). - Step 3 → If the flights tool returns fewer than 3 options, call web_search with query "London to Paris flights on [date]" to supplement results. - Step 4 → Merge both sets of results and send the combined summary to the user. Pick **one** plan you will execute.

Reasoning: I need to reflect on the three candidate plans and decide which one to execute based on efficiency, thoroughness, and the user's request. The user wants to find information about available flights from London to Paris for tomorrow. I have three tools available: calendar, flights, and web_search. Let me analyze each plan: Plan A: - Gets tomorrow's date via calendar. - Calls flights tool. - Cross-checks with web_search to verify discrepancies. - If discrepancies exist, re-query flights. - Summarize all options. This plan is thorough but may involve unnecessary steps if flights tool is reliable and web_search adds noise. It could be time-consuming. Plan B: - Gets date via calendar. - Calls flights tool. - Summarizes results directly. This is the most direct and efficient plan, assuming flights tool provides accurate and sufficient information. It avoids extra steps. Plan C: - Gets date via calendar. - Calls flights tool. - If fewer than 3 options, supplements with web_search. - Merges and summarizes. This is a balanced approach, ensuring at least some options but adding web_search only if needed. Considering the user's goal: 'find information about available flights.' The flights tool is specifically designed for this purpose and is available. The instructions emphasize efficiency and directness. Plan B is the most direct and effective, using the dedicated flights tool without extra steps. Plan C adds conditional complexity, and Plan A adds verification that may not be necessary. Therefore, Plan B aligns best with the goal of efficiency and using available tools appropriately. Response: I will execute Plan B.