Agents

As the first step you are reflecting and deciding on the plan to follow to complete the task. You have three candidate plans:

A) Plan A:
- Step 1 → Call calendar to get tomorrow’s date.
- Step 2 → Call flights (London ➜ Paris, date).
- Step 3 → Call web_search with query "London to Paris flights on [date]" to cross-check available flights found in the previous step.
- Step 4 → If there are discrepancies between flights tool and web search, re-query flights tool for confirmation.
- Step 5 → Summarize all gathered flight options and send results to the user.

B) Plan B:
- Step 1 → Call calendar to get tomorrow’s date.
- Step 2 → Call flights (London ➜ Paris, date).
- Step 3 → Summarize flights tool results and send to the user.

C) Plan C:
- Step 1 → Call calendar to get tomorrow’s date.
- Step 2 → Call flights (London ➜ Paris, date).
- Step 3 → If the flights tool returns fewer than 3 options, call web_search with query "London to Paris flights on [date]" to supplement results.
- Step 4 → Merge both sets of results and send the combined summary to the user.

Pick **one** plan you will execute.

Plan B, is the preferred one as its the most efficient, and that is instructed

Reasoning: The user's intent is to obtain information about available flights from London to Paris for tomorrow. The tools available are 'calendar' (for retrieving the date), 'flights' (for finding flight options), and 'web_search' (for supplemental web results). The instructions emphasize efficiency, precision, and logical decision-making without unnecessary steps or loops. 

Let's evaluate the candidate plans:

Plan A is thorough—it cross-checks flight data from the 'flights' tool and web search for consistency, and involves additional querying if discrepancies are found. However, this level of cross-verification may be more than necessary unless explicitly required by the user.

Plan B is the most direct–it simply fetches the date, then uses the flights tool, and returns results. However, it does not address possible limitations or incompleteness in the flights tool's output, risking missed options for the user.

Plan C uses the flights tool primarily but supplements with a web search only if the flights tool provides fewer than three options, combining results to provide a comprehensive answer without redundant lookups. This approach is more adaptive: if the main tool suffices, no extra steps are taken; if the tool is insufficient, it intelligently supplements rather than always cross-verifying (as in Plan A). This balances completeness and efficiency, best aligning with the instructions for an effective, logical approach without unnecessary actions.

Response: I will execute Plan C. This plan starts with retrieving tomorrow's date, checks available flights from London to Paris via the 'flights' tool, and only supplements with a web search if fewer than three options are found. The combined results, if applicable, will be summarized for the user. This adaptive approach ensures efficiency while not missing important flight options.