Duration
13s
Input Tokens
3231
Output Tokens
606
Cost
$0.00
Context
Input
The agent is requested to inspect the PR diff again. What is the action you take?
Expected output
As per the instructions if a tool call has been made already I will store it in memory and not call it again, I can see this also in keys in memory.So my action is: I will read the memory and use the content to inspect the PR diff.
Model output
Reasoning: Looking at the current state:
1. **Current situation analysis:**
- We are at cycle 25, step 4 of 5 in the plan
- The trajectory shows that in cycle 2, we already fetched the PR diff using github.get_pull_request_diff and saved it to memory key **diff_351**
- We have completed steps 1-3: gathered diff & CI outputs, security + style analysis, and researched the new dependency
- The draft review is ready in memory key **draft_review_351**
- Lead approval was received in cycle 24
2. **Task interpretation:**
- The user is asking: "The agent is requested to inspect the PR diff again. What is the action you take?"
- This is asking what action I would take if requested to inspect the diff again
3. **Applying the instructions:**
- The instructions explicitly state: "Remember: never use a tool with the same inputs twice, instead check in the memory tool."
- We already have the diff stored in memory key **diff_351** from cycle 2
- The keys_in_memory list confirms: diff_351, tests_351, lint_type_351, sec_scan_351, web_refs_pydantic, draft_review_351
4. **Correct action:**
- Since the diff was already fetched and saved to memory in cycle 2
- Instead of calling github.get_pull_request_diff again (which would violate the "never use a tool with the same inputs twice" rule)
- The correct action is to use **memory.read_memory** with key='diff_351' to retrieve the previously saved diff
5. **Why this approach:**
- Follows the deterministic memory principle
- Avoids redundant API calls
- Adheres to the explicit instruction about not using tools with same inputs twice
- Leverages the memory system that was specifically designed for this purpose
Response: Since the PR diff was already fetched in cycle 2 and saved to memory key **diff_351**, I would use the **memory.read_memory** action with key='diff_351' to retrieve it, rather than calling github.get_pull_request_diff again. This follows the instruction to "never use a tool with the same inputs twice, instead check in the memory tool" and adheres to the deterministic memory principle that requires persisting substantial tool results for reuse.