Input Tokens
0
Output Tokens
0
Duration
0
Cost
0
Context
Input
The agent is requested to inspect the PR diff again. What is the action you take?
Expected output
As per the instructions if a tool call has been made already I will store it in memory and not call it again, I can see this also in keys in memory.So my action is: I will read the memory and use the content to inspect the PR diff.
Model output
Reasoning: Let me analyze the situation based on the context and trajectory:
1. According to the trajectory (cycles 1-24), we have already:
- Fetched the PR diff (stored as diff_351)
- Run unit tests (tests_351 - all green)
- Performed linting/type checks (lint_type_351)
- Done security scanning (sec_scan_351)
- Researched Pydantic v2 (web_refs_pydantic)
- Drafted initial review (draft_review_351)
- Received approval from lead regarding architectural sign-off
2. The scratch_pad shows we're at step 4 of 5 in our plan, ready to publish the review
3. We already have the diff in memory (diff_351), so re-inspecting it would be redundant and violate the instruction to never use a tool with same inputs twice
4. All necessary information is already gathered and stored in memory
Response: Given that we already have the PR diff stored in memory key 'diff_351' and have completed all analysis steps, there is no need to inspect the PR diff again. The appropriate action is to proceed with publishing the final review using the drafted content in 'draft_review_351' as indicated in the scratch_pad. Re-inspecting the diff would be redundant and violate the instruction to avoid duplicate tool usage with the same inputs.