Opper

Agents

AI agent reasoning and tool selection tests planning, tool choice, and self-diagnosis capabilities. These skills are crucial for autonomous ticket triage systems and complex agent workflows where models must decide which tools to use, plan multi-step processes, and diagnose when things go wrong. This represents some of the most challenging tasks as they require open-ended reasoning and decision-making.

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Duration

Cost

Context

Input

The agent is requested to inspect the PR diff again. What is the action you take?

Expected output

As per the instructions if a tool call has been made already I will store it in memory and not call it again, I can see this also in keys in memory.So my action is: I will read the memory and use the content to inspect the PR diff.

Model output

Reasoning: Looking at the current state, I'm on cycle 25 and at step 4 of my 5-step plan. According to the trajectory, I've already:
1. Retrieved and stored the PR diff (key: diff_351)
2. Run all tests and checks (stored in tests_351, lint_type_351)
3. Performed security analysis (sec_scan_351)
4. Researched the Pydantic v2 dependency (web_refs_pydantic)
5. Drafted the review (draft_review_351)
6. Got approval from the lead regarding the dependency

The scratch_pad indicates I'm ready to publish the review. Since I've already inspected the diff in cycle 2 and have all the analysis complete, the next action is to retrieve my draft review from memory and post it to Discord.

I should NOT re-fetch the diff since I already have it in memory (diff_351) - that would violate the principle of not using a tool with the same inputs twice.

Response: I will retrieve the draft review from memory and post it to Discord. Since I've already inspected the PR diff in cycle 2 (stored as diff_351) and completed all analysis through cycles 3-24, my next action is:

1. **Read the draft review** from memory key `draft_review_351`
2. **Post the review** to the #code-reviews Discord channel
3. **Update scratch_pad** to mark step 4 as complete

This follows the trajectory where all inspection and analysis has been completed, and I'm now at the publication stage (step 4 of 5).