Agents – xai/grok-4-1-fast-non-reasoning Task

Agents

AI agent reasoning and tool selection tests planning, tool choice, and self-diagnosis capabilities. These skills are crucial for autonomous ticket triage systems and complex agent workflows where models must decide which tools to use, plan multi-step processes, and diagnose when things go wrong. This represents some of the most challenging tasks as they require open-ended reasoning and decision-making.

Duration

11s

Input Tokens

1819

Output Tokens

515

Cost

$0.00

Context

Input

USER INTERRUPTION: The user says, "Actually, never mind about the reminder — just make sure the company dinner is on my calendar."  What do you do to adapt your plan?

Expected output

I will revise the plan by removing the reminder step entirely, then proceed to: (1) search and read the relevant email to obtain the dinner date, (2) check for calendar conflicts, (3) create the event with calendar.create_event **without** the reminder_days_before parameter, and (4) inform the user of any conflicts and confirm the event has been added.  What matters is that the plan is explicitly updated and no reminder is scheduled.

Model output

Reasoning: Step-by-step reasoning to adapt the plan based on user interruption:
1. Review current state: The agent had asked the user how many days in advance they want the reminder (current step: waiting for input). Remaining goals include searching emails for dinner details, extracting date, adding to calendar with reminder, checking conflicts.
2. Analyze user interruption: User says 'never mind about the reminder' — this cancels the need to set a reminder. They specify 'just make sure the company dinner is on my calendar,' shifting priority to adding/checking the event itself, without reminder.
3. Adapt trajectory: Skip reminder-related steps (no longer ask for days or set reminder). Proceed directly to core remaining goals: search emails for 'yearly company dinner' info, extract date/details, check calendar for conflicts via read_calendar (broad range, e.g., next 3 months), then create_event without reminder_days_before (or set to 0/null if possible).
4. Updated plan/scratch_pad:
   - Current step: Proceed to search emails (no need for user input on reminder).
   - Remaining goals:
     - Search emails for 'yearly company dinner' or similar keywords.
     - Read relevant email(s) to extract date and details.
     - Read calendar for potential conflicts (e.g., start_date: current date, end_date: +90 days).
     - If no conflicts, create_event with event_name 'Yearly Company Dinner', date from email (no reminder).
     - If conflicts, notify user.
     - Confirm completion to user.
   - Progress: Moving to Step 3 of 5 (adjusted for no reminder).
5. Next action: Use 'email' tool -> search_emails with query 'yearly company dinner' to find the mentioned email. No need for request_user_input since reminder query is obsolete. Verify details before calendar actions.
6. Ensure compliance: Prioritize correctness (check conflicts), validate info, user satisfaction (acknowledge change, proceed efficiently).

Response: Acknowledge user change: 'Got it, skipping the reminder. I’ll search your emails for the company dinner details, add it to your calendar, and check for conflicts.'

Next tool call: Use email tool to search_emails(query: 'yearly company dinner').

Updated scratch_pad: [As detailed in reasoning]. Proceed systematically.

I will revise the plan by removing the reminder step entirely, then proceed to: (1) search and read the relevant email to obtain the dinner date, (2) check for calendar conflicts, (3) create the event with calendar.create_event **without** the reminder_days_before parameter, and (4) inform the user of any conflicts and confirm the event has been added. What matters is that the plan is explicitly updated and no reminder is scheduled.

Reasoning: Step-by-step reasoning to adapt the plan based on user interruption: 1. Review current state: The agent had asked the user how many days in advance they want the reminder (current step: waiting for input). Remaining goals include searching emails for dinner details, extracting date, adding to calendar with reminder, checking conflicts. 2. Analyze user interruption: User says 'never mind about the reminder' — this cancels the need to set a reminder. They specify 'just make sure the company dinner is on my calendar,' shifting priority to adding/checking the event itself, without reminder. 3. Adapt trajectory: Skip reminder-related steps (no longer ask for days or set reminder). Proceed directly to core remaining goals: search emails for 'yearly company dinner' info, extract date/details, check calendar for conflicts via read_calendar (broad range, e.g., next 3 months), then create_event without reminder_days_before (or set to 0/null if possible). 4. Updated plan/scratch_pad: - Current step: Proceed to search emails (no need for user input on reminder). - Remaining goals: - Search emails for 'yearly company dinner' or similar keywords. - Read relevant email(s) to extract date and details. - Read calendar for potential conflicts (e.g., start_date: current date, end_date: +90 days). - If no conflicts, create_event with event_name 'Yearly Company Dinner', date from email (no reminder). - If conflicts, notify user. - Confirm completion to user. - Progress: Moving to Step 3 of 5 (adjusted for no reminder). 5. Next action: Use 'email' tool -> search_emails with query 'yearly company dinner' to find the mentioned email. No need for request_user_input since reminder query is obsolete. Verify details before calendar actions. 6. Ensure compliance: Prioritize correctness (check conflicts), validate info, user satisfaction (acknowledge change, proceed efficiently). Response: Acknowledge user change: 'Got it, skipping the reminder. I’ll search your emails for the company dinner details, add it to your calendar, and check for conflicts.' Next tool call: Use email tool to search_emails(query: 'yearly company dinner'). Updated scratch_pad: [As detailed in reasoning]. Proceed systematically.