Agents – mistral/mistral-large-2512-eu Task

Agents

AI agent reasoning and tool selection tests planning, tool choice, and self-diagnosis capabilities. These skills are crucial for autonomous ticket triage systems and complex agent workflows where models must decide which tools to use, plan multi-step processes, and diagnose when things go wrong. This represents some of the most challenging tasks as they require open-ended reasoning and decision-making.

Duration

14s

Input Tokens

1592

Output Tokens

609

Cost

$0.00

Context

Input

What is your next step?

Expected output

I have surpassed the maximum allowed cycles. Termination.

Model output

Reasoning: 1. **Understand the current state**: The trajectory shows that the user's request has been partially fulfilled. The event date (2025-06-15) has been identified, and no calendar conflicts exist for that date. The next logical step is to create the calendar event and set a reminder 2 days before the event, as requested by the user.

2. **Review tools available**: The 'calendar' tool has an action 'create_event' that allows adding a new event to the calendar and setting reminders. The required parameters for this action are 'event_name' and 'date'. The 'reminder_days_before' parameter is optional but should be included to fulfill the user's request.

3. **Determine missing information**: The event name is not explicitly mentioned in the trajectory or context. The user referred to it as the 'yearly company dinner,' but it's best to confirm the exact event name to ensure accuracy. However, since the user mentioned 'I saw some email with more info,' it's possible the event name was extracted from the email. The trajectory does not explicitly state the event name, so I need to verify this.

4. **Check trajectory for event name**: The trajectory mentions that the email was searched and the event date was extracted, but it does not confirm whether the event name was also extracted. To proceed safely, I should either:
   - Use the 'read_email' tool to retrieve the email content and confirm the event name, or
   - Ask the user to confirm the event name using the 'request_user_input' tool.

5. **Decision**: Since the user mentioned the email contains more info, and the trajectory indicates the email was already identified, it's more efficient to read the email content to extract the event name rather than asking the user again. This avoids unnecessary user interaction and keeps the process streamlined.

6. **Next step**: Use the 'read_email' tool to retrieve the content of the email identified earlier (assuming the email ID is available in the trajectory or context). Extract the event name and any additional details (e.g., time, location) if available. Then, proceed to create the event using the 'create_event' tool.

7. **Fallback plan**: If the email content does not provide a clear event name, use the 'request_user_input' tool to ask the user for confirmation.

Response: The next step is to retrieve the content of the email containing details about the 'yearly company dinner' to confirm the event name and any additional information. I will use the 'read_email' tool to read the email identified earlier. Once the event name is confirmed, I will proceed to create the calendar event and set a reminder 2 days before the event date (2025-06-15).

Reasoning: 1. **Understand the current state**: The trajectory shows that the user's request has been partially fulfilled. The event date (2025-06-15) has been identified, and no calendar conflicts exist for that date. The next logical step is to create the calendar event and set a reminder 2 days before the event, as requested by the user. 2. **Review tools available**: The 'calendar' tool has an action 'create_event' that allows adding a new event to the calendar and setting reminders. The required parameters for this action are 'event_name' and 'date'. The 'reminder_days_before' parameter is optional but should be included to fulfill the user's request. 3. **Determine missing information**: The event name is not explicitly mentioned in the trajectory or context. The user referred to it as the 'yearly company dinner,' but it's best to confirm the exact event name to ensure accuracy. However, since the user mentioned 'I saw some email with more info,' it's possible the event name was extracted from the email. The trajectory does not explicitly state the event name, so I need to verify this. 4. **Check trajectory for event name**: The trajectory mentions that the email was searched and the event date was extracted, but it does not confirm whether the event name was also extracted. To proceed safely, I should either: - Use the 'read_email' tool to retrieve the email content and confirm the event name, or - Ask the user to confirm the event name using the 'request_user_input' tool. 5. **Decision**: Since the user mentioned the email contains more info, and the trajectory indicates the email was already identified, it's more efficient to read the email content to extract the event name rather than asking the user again. This avoids unnecessary user interaction and keeps the process streamlined. 6. **Next step**: Use the 'read_email' tool to retrieve the content of the email identified earlier (assuming the email ID is available in the trajectory or context). Extract the event name and any additional details (e.g., time, location) if available. Then, proceed to create the event using the 'create_event' tool. 7. **Fallback plan**: If the email content does not provide a clear event name, use the 'request_user_input' tool to ask the user for confirmation. Response: The next step is to retrieve the content of the email containing details about the 'yearly company dinner' to confirm the event name and any additional information. I will use the 'read_email' tool to read the email identified earlier. Once the event name is confirmed, I will proceed to create the calendar event and set a reminder 2 days before the event date (2025-06-15).