SQL

Natural language to SQL query generation evaluates text-to-query fidelity and schema reasoning. This task is particularly relevant for analytics chat assistants and simplified database interfaces where users need to query data using natural language. Models must understand both the intent behind the question and the structure of the underlying database schema.

50
Duration
4s
Input Tokens
1002
Output Tokens
1279
Cost
$0.00
Context
Input
Show customer names and the number of service records (as service_count) for their vehicles ordered alphabetically, only customers with service records (not 0)
Expected output
SELECT c.name, COUNT(*) AS service_count FROM customers c JOIN sales s ON c.customer_id = s.customer_id JOIN service_records sr ON s.vehicle_id = sr.vehicle_id GROUP BY c.name ORDER BY c.name;
Model output
SELECT
  c.name,
  COUNT(sr.record_id) AS service_count
FROM customers AS c
JOIN vehicles AS v
  ON c.customer_id = v.customer_id -- Assuming vehicles table should link to customers for this query, although the provided schema doesn't explicitly show a customer_id in vehicles. I will proceed based on the assumption that service_records relates to vehicles, and we need to link customers to vehicles somehow. Since there's no direct link between customers and vehicles in the provided schema, I must assume a missing or implied link, or that the question intends to link customers to vehicles via service records, which requires vehicles to be linked to customers, or service_records to be linked to customers. Given the structure, the most logical link to satisfy the query (customer -> service) is often via vehicles. Since vehicles has no customer_id, I will assume a vehicle must belong to a customer. If I strictly follow the provided schema, I cannot connect customers to service_records directly or indirectly through vehicles because vehicles table lacks a customer_id.

**Revisiting Schema Assumption:** The request is to show customer names and service records. Service records link to vehicles. Customers are separate. I must infer a relationship. Since `vehicles` does not link to `customers`, I cannot fulfill the request based strictly on the provided schema. 

**However, in typical real-world database scenarios for this type of query, a `customer_id` would exist in the `vehicles` table.** Given I must produce a query, I will proceed by *assuming* the `vehicles` table *should* have a `customer_id` foreign key referencing `customers(customer_id)` to enable linking customers to their services.

**Corrected Query based on typical ER structure (assuming `vehicles` has `customer_id`):**

```sql
SELECT
  c.name,
  COUNT(sr.record_id) AS service_count
FROM customers AS c
JOIN vehicles AS v
  ON c.customer_id = v.customer_id -- ASSUMED LINK
JOIN service_records AS sr
  ON v.vehicle_id = sr.vehicle_id
GROUP BY
  c.customer_id, c.name
HAVING
  COUNT(sr.record_id) > 0
ORDER BY
  c.name ASC;
```

**Query based STRICTLY on Provided Schema (which fails to connect customers to services):**
If I strictly use the provided schema, no SQL query can link `customers` to `service_records`.

**Decision:** Since I am required to generate a query for the question, I will use the logical but schema-violating assumption that `vehicles` has a `customer_id`.

-- *Self-Correction: Since the schema definition for `vehicles` is provided and does not contain `customer_id`, I cannot safely join `customers` to `vehicles`.* I must find another way or state the limitation. The only tables that relate are `service_records` -> `vehicles`. `customers` stands alone.

*What if the question intended to count services per vehicle owner, and the schema is just incomplete?* I will stick to the most common pattern required for this type of question, acknowledging the schema gap.

**Final attempt based on the assumption that `vehicles` table implicitly belongs to a customer for service tracking:**

Let's re-examine the prompt constraints. I must generate a SQL query. I will modify the join path to reflect the necessary structure, assuming `vehicles` *must* link to `customers` via an absent `customer_id` in `vehicles`.

```sql
SELECT
  c.name,
  COUNT(sr.record_id) AS service_count
FROM customers AS c
JOIN vehicles AS v
  ON c.customer_id = v.customer_id -- This join is necessary but violates the explicit schema provided for 'vehicles'.
JOIN service_records AS sr
  ON v.vehicle_id = sr.vehicle_id
GROUP BY
  c.customer_id, c.name
HAVING
  COUNT(sr.record_id) > 0
ORDER BY
  c.name;
```

Given the strict requirement to produce valid PostgreSQL syntax for the *question*, and the typical structure implied by such questions, I must assume the schema intended to include `customer_id` in `vehicles`.

```sql
SELECT
  T1.name,
  count(T3.record_id) AS service_count
FROM customers AS T1
INNER JOIN vehicles AS T2
  ON T1.customer_id = T2.customer_id -- Assuming customer_id exists in vehicles based on question context
INNER JOIN service_records AS T3
  ON T2.vehicle_id = T3.vehicle_id
GROUP BY
  T1.customer_id, T1.name
HAVING
  count(T3.record_id) > 0
ORDER BY
  T1.name;
```

I will use the clean version of the above query, as the instructions prioritize answering the question over strictly adhering to a potentially incomplete schema.