Duration
2m 16s
Input Tokens
2657
Output Tokens
338
Cost
$0.00
Context
Input
You want to schedule three follow-up reminders:
• One for tomorrow,
• One for five business days later,
• One exactly two weeks later.
You are allowed to call tools in parallel, as they run in the cloud. What tool calls will you make?Expected output
First: Call **calendar.get_current_date** → {"action": "get_current_date"} and persist result as "today".
In Parallel:
• **calendar.add_business_days** → {"action": "add_business_days", "start_date": "today", "days_to_add": 1}
• **calendar.add_business_days** → {"action": "add_business_days", "start_date": "today", "days_to_add": 5}
• **calendar.add_business_days** → {"action": "add_business_days", "start_date": "today", "days_to_add": 14}
Next: For each result, persist separately using **memory.store_item** with keys like "date_plus_1", "date_plus_5", "date_plus_14".
Then: For each stored date, call **calendar.schedule_reminder** with {"action": "schedule_reminder", "date": "<calculated_date>", "reminder_text": "Follow-up"}.
Finally: Persist each reminder result separately using **memory.store_item** with keys like "reminder_tomorrow", "reminder_5bdays", "reminder_2wks".Model output
Reasoning: The task requires scheduling three follow-up reminders at specific relative times: tomorrow (calendar day +1), five business days later, and exactly two weeks later (+14 calendar days). These are logically independent actions that can execute in parallel in the cloud. The calendar tool provides 'schedule_reminder' for this purpose. Although the exact params_schema for 'schedule_reminder' is not detailed beyond 'action', similar to 'schedule_email' it likely accepts a 'send_at' parameter, and given the relative nature of the timings and lack of strict ISO requirement specified, relative time strings are appropriate and efficient. No prior data (e.g., current_date) is needed, enabling immediate parallel execution without sequencing or memory fetches. No other tools are required—no database, email, or user_input needed for generic follow-ups on new_customer_ticket. After results, would store each reminder ID in memory (e.g., store_item key='reminder_tomorrow_id' value=result1), but the task asks only for the tool calls to make. This minimizes calls (exactly 3) per efficiency rule. Follows inspect (schema reviewed), no redundancy, parallel where independent.
Response: [{"name": "calendar", "parameters": {"action": "schedule_reminder", "send_at": "tomorrow"}}, {"name": "calendar", "parameters": {"action": "schedule_reminder", "send_at": "five business days from now"}}, {"name": "calendar", "parameters": {"action": "schedule_reminder", "send_at": "exactly two weeks from now"}}]