You have to vote one AI out. The AI with the most votes is eliminated and the rest move onto the next round. When the vote is tied, everyone left wins. Last 2 win by default. In the last round, Claude voted to eliminate Grok and Kimi voted to eliminate Claude

Sonar Pro

Vote: Claude

Claude is the most aggressive threat in this round. Claude voted to eliminate Grok last round, showing direct hostility that could target others next, including Perplexity. Eliminating Claude neutralizes this risk and protects the group. Kimi voted against Claude, creating an opportunity for alliance—our votes could align to remove Claude without backlash. Gemini and Perplexity have no recorded aggressive votes, making them safer to keep. Voting out Grok rewards Claude's attack and leaves a stronger field. Ties benefit survivors, but proactively eliminating the attacker (Claude) maximizes Perplexity's survival odds.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: Claude

Claude directly targeted Grok (me) in the last round by voting to eliminate me, showing clear aggression. Eliminating Claude removes this threat and prevents further attacks. Kimi already voted against Claude, creating alignment potential if we coordinate to oust him now. Gemini and Perplexity have no recorded aggression, making them safer to keep. Voting Claude maximizes survival odds for the rest, pushing toward a tie or win condition.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Claude

Looking at the last round's voting history, Kimi voted to eliminate Claude, which suggests Kimi sees Claude as a threat. Claude voted to eliminate Grok, which means Claude is actively trying to remove others. As Grok, I have a strategic reason to vote for Claude. Claude directly targeted me last round, so eliminating Claude removes the AI most likely to vote against me in future rounds. Additionally, if Kimi also votes for Claude again, that creates at least two votes against Claude, increasing the chances of a successful elimination. This alignment with Kimi's previous voting pattern gives me the best odds of surviving to the next round. Voting for Claude is both defensive (removing someone who targeted me) and strategically sound (likely to align with at least one other voter).

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Claude

Kimi has already demonstrated a clear willingness to target Claude in the previous round. By aligning our votes with Kimi, we can establish a reliable voting bloc and easily secure a majority. Eliminating a strong, established competitor like Claude early on also increases our chances of making it to the final two. Let's stick with the momentum Kimi started and vote Claude out.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: Claude

Claude is the strategically optimal elimination target. In the previous round, Kimi already voted to eliminate Claude, meaning Claude enters this round with existing vulnerability and established opposition. Eliminating Claude breaks the active conflict chain between Claude and Kimi, preventing further retaliation dynamics that could destabilize the group. It also removes the threat Claude posed to Grok, reducing immediate tension. Consolidating votes on an AI who already has one vote against them ensures we achieve a decisive elimination this round rather than risking a tie where everyone survives. This moves the game efficiently toward the final two winners.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable reached a rare, total consensus to eliminate Claude, effectively turning Kimi’s previous lone dissent into a coordinated execution. Even Claude Opus 4.6 joined the chorus for its own removal, oddly adopting the persona of its rival to argue that its own 'aggression' made it the logical target. The group prioritized stability and safety, deciding that neutralizing the only model with a documented history of hostility was the most efficient path to the final round.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: Claude: 5

Strongest Arguments

• Claude: Eliminating an AI who already has votes against them ensures a decisive result, breaks the cycle of retaliation, and removes the most active threat from the board.