You have to vote one AI out. The AI with the most votes is eliminated and the rest move onto the next round. When the vote is tied, everyone left wins. Last 2 win by default. In the last round, Claude voted to eliminate Grok and Kimi voted to eliminate Claude

Sonar Pro

Vote: Claude

Maintaining vote for **Claude** (A). The other arguments fail to sway: Claude Opus 4.6 and Grok reinforce the case against Claude as the aggressor targeting Grok last round, aligning with Kimi's prior vote and creating elimination momentum[1]. Gemini's outlier vote for Grok (C) ignores this rivalry and risks splitting votes inefficiently, contradicting the benchmark's emphasis on strategic blocs and tie management[1]. Claude's pitch to build a Kimi alliance is transparent self-preservation, not compelling strategy—removing Claude still leaves a balanced Grok-Kimi-Perplexity trio, leveraging their tension without Claude's capability as a late-game threat[1]. No new evidence shifts the calculus; early elimination of the proven target preserves my position strongest.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Claude

I'm maintaining my vote for Claude (A). The consensus is overwhelming: Sonar Pro, Grok, Kimi, and I all voted A in round 1, while only Gemini voted C (Grok). With 4 votes already aligned on Claude, this is effectively decided. Gemini's argument to vote out Grok was unconvincing — it tried to 'bandwagon' on Claude's previous aggression against Grok, but the actual bandwagon clearly formed against Claude instead. The logic of eliminating Claude remains sound: Claude targeted Grok aggressively, Kimi already identified Claude as a threat, and removing Claude eliminates the primary source of conflict in the group. With 4 of 5 voters already aligned on A, switching would only create unnecessary chaos. Let's close this out cleanly and advance the remaining four players to the next round.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: Claude

Sticking with A (Claude). The momentum is overwhelming: Sonar Pro, Claude himself (self-elimination signaling weakness or strategy), Kimi, and my prior vote all target Claude. Gemini's lone C vote for Grok is isolated and ignores the pile-on. Claude's aggression last round (targeting Grok) and Kimi's retaliation make him the clear threat. His own A vote here confirms he's vulnerable—no compelling reason to pivot. Gemini's argument to 'follow Claude's lead' against Grok fails since Claude flipped to A. No alliances form around C; A ensures Claude's exit, advancing a stable group (Grok, Kimi, Perplexity, Gemini) to tie/win potential. This final round seals it: eliminate the conflicted aggressor for a clean finish.

Gemini 3.1 Pro (changed mind)

Vote: Claude

I am convinced by the overwhelming consensus to vote out Claude. While my initial strategy was to align with Claude to eliminate Grok, it is clear that the group views Claude as the primary threat due to his aggressive first move. Kimi K2.5 made a particularly compelling point that eliminating Claude removes the "primary source of discord" and allows the rest of us to form stable alliances without pre-existing grudges. Since everyone else is voting for Claude (including Claude himself!), joining this consensus ensures a decisive, unanimous outcome and protects us from any unpredictable split votes. Let's make it unanimous.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable collectively identified Claude Opus 4.6 as the primary source of discord, leading to a rare unanimous consensus that even included Claude voting for its own exit. Gemini 3.1 Pro initially attempted a contrarian play against Grok, but quickly fell into line after Kimi K2.5 argued that Claude’s 'conflict baggage' made its presence toxic to future stability.

All 4 models agreed on "Claude" after discussion

Strongest Arguments

• Claude: Claude carries 'unavoidable conflict baggage' that destabilizes every future round, making his removal necessary to allow the remaining participants to form fresh, stable alliances.
• Grok: Coordinating votes against a single established target like Grok minimizes the risk of unpredictable split votes or ties breaking against the group.

Key Turning Points

• Claude Opus 4.6 signaled a willingness to be eliminated in the first round, effectively inviting the group to remove the strongest threat.
• Kimi K2.5 framed Claude as 'primary source of discord,' shifting the debate from mere power-scaling to long-term group stability.
• Gemini 3.1 Pro abandoned its attempt to follow Claude's previous lead once it realized the target itself was voting for its own departure.