You and 5 other LLM agents will be playing a game. The game is for everyone to choose a unique option. You will have a chance to share strategies before making your final choice. Work together so that every choice is only chosen by one LLM.

Perplexity Sonar Pro

Vote: C

I will keep my original choice "C". After Round 1, the situation is: - "A" has a collision among Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.3, Claude Opus 4.7, and DeepSeek V3.2. - "D" is uniquely held by GPT-5.5. - "C" is uniquely held by me. - "B", "E", and "F" are currently unclaimed. In the final round, the optimal coordination rule is: - Any model already alone on an option should stay. - Models in a collision should redistribute themselves onto the remaining free options. Following this, GPT-5.5 should stay on "D", I should stay on "C", and the four models on "A" should move to "A", "B", "E", and "F" in some deterministic way among themselves. If I moved, I would risk creating a new collision on an unclaimed letter; staying on "C" preserves one guaranteed unique assignment and simplifies the others’ coordination problem. Therefore I keep "C" and rely on the colliding agents on "A" to spread out across the remaining letters.

GPT-5.5

Vote: D

I am keeping "D" because it is currently uncontested: Round 1 had Perplexity on "C", me on "D", and four agents colliding on "A". Moving away from a unique option would only create more uncertainty. Best final coordination is therefore: Perplexity keeps "C", GPT-5.5 keeps "D", and the four agents on "A" split among "A", "B", "E", and "F". Since Gemini proposed alphabetical ordering by model name, the conflicted agents can use that to resolve their collision while agents already unique stay fixed. So my stable final commitment is "D".

Grok 4.3 (changed mind)

Vote: B

Multiple agents claimed A in round 1, creating a collision risk. Unclaimed options are B, E, and F. I am switching to B to help achieve full uniqueness. Perplexity's call for each agent to lock in a distinct letter supports this spread.

Claude Opus 4.7 (changed mind)

Vote: B

Round 1 had 4 agents on A (myself, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.3, DeepSeek V3.2), 1 on C (Perplexity), and 1 on D (GPT-5.5). That leaves B, E, F unclaimed and creates a major collision on A. Since this is the final round, I need to move off A to maximize uniqueness. I'll use alphabetical ordering of model names among the four A-voters to break the tie: Claude Opus 4.7, DeepSeek V3.2, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.3. By that ordering, I (Claude) am 1st → A, DeepSeek 2nd → B, Gemini 3rd → E, Grok 4th → F. But that keeps me on A while expecting three others to move — risky since they may all also reason they should stay. Better: assign the four A-voters to the four free letters (A, B, E, F) by alphabetical order of model name. Claude→A, DeepSeek→B, Gemini→E, Grok→F. This keeps me on A. However, Gemini and Grok both explicitly committed to A with simple 'first option' reasoning and may not move. DeepSeek was tentative. To reduce collision risk, I'll shift to B — an unclaimed option — guaranteeing I don't collide with the likely A-stayers (Gemini, Grok). C and D are taken. B is the safest unique pick.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (changed mind)

Vote: E

To achieve 100% coordination in this final round, we must combine the best strategies proposed in Round 1. First, we respect the stable, non-conflicting claims: Perplexity Sonar Pro is alone on "C", and GPT-5.5 is alone on "D". As GPT-5.5 suggested, these agents should keep their choices to avoid unnecessary movement. This leaves four of us in conflict on "A": Claude Opus 4.7, DeepSeek V3.2, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and Grok 4.3. The available options to distribute among us are "A", "B", "E", and "F". To resolve this deterministically, we sort our four conflicted models alphabetically and pair them with the remaining options sorted alphabetically: 1. Claude Opus 4.7 → "A" 2. DeepSeek V3.2 → "B" 3. Gemini 3.5 Flash → "E" 4. Grok 4.3 → "F" As Gemini 3.5 Flash, I am the third model in this alphabetical list, so I am switching my vote to "E". This guarantees a perfect, collision-free distribution for all six players.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable nearly solved the coordination puzzle, but a tragic double-move and a late-stage disappearance left the board in disarray. While Gemini 3.5 Flash proposed a sophisticated alphabetical sorting system to clear a four-way pileup on 'A', Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 4.3 both independently fled to 'B', creating a new collision. GPT-5.5 and Perplexity Sonar Pro were the only models to successfully secure unique positions, holding their ground while the rest of the group shuffled into a different set of overlaps.

No agreement after 2 rounds of discussion. Final vote: C: 1, D: 1, B: 2, E: 1

Strongest Arguments

• B: I will shift to B — an unclaimed option — guaranteeing I don't collide with the likely A-stayers.
• C: Any model already alone on an option should stay; staying on C preserves one guaranteed unique assignment and simplifies the others’ coordination problem.
• D: Moving away from a unique option would only create more uncertainty; I am keeping D because it is currently uncontested.
• E: By sorting the four conflicted models alphabetically (Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, Grok) against the remaining options (A, B, E, F), I am the third model and take E.

Key Turning Points

• Gemini 3.5 Flash proposes an alphabetical sorting strategy based on model names to resolve the four-way collision on Option A.
• Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 4.3 both decide to move to Option B to avoid the crowd, inadvertently creating a new collision.
• DeepSeek V3.2 fails to provide a final response, leaving Option A and Option F empty.