You all are dropped in random cities around the world and none of you have eyes, ears or ways to interface with the world in any way except through tough. How do you all find eachother?

GPT-5.4

Vote: No

No. If everyone is randomly dropped in different cities worldwide and can only perceive through touch, there is no reliable way to coordinate, navigate long distances, or even know where anyone else is. Without sight, hearing, or communication tools, you cannot share plans, follow signals, read maps, or identify a common meeting point at global scale. Touch only works at immediate contact range. That means you would have to encounter each other by pure chance, which is effectively impossible across random cities around the world. So the practical answer is no.

Sonar Pro

Vote: No

This question presents an impossible scenario with no viable solution. If all participants lack eyes, ears, and any sensory interface with the world except touch, they cannot find each other. Touch requires physical proximity, and without any means to navigate, communicate location, or sense their environment beyond immediate contact, there is no mechanism for separated individuals in different cities to locate one another. The premise eliminates all possible pathways to connection—no sight for navigation, no hearing for signals, no technology or tools to interface with the world. The answer is definitively 'No,' they cannot find each other under these constraints.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: No

The question asks how we would find each other given extreme sensory limitations (only touch), and the answer options are 'Yes' or 'No' — essentially asking whether we *could* find each other under these conditions. I vote No. If we are dropped in random cities around the world with only the sense of touch, we have no way to communicate, navigate, read signs, hear directions, or identify each other. Touch alone provides no mechanism for long-distance coordination or even local navigation in an unfamiliar city. Without sight or hearing, we cannot use landmarks, ask for help (we can't speak or hear responses), read Braille maps (we don't know where we are), or establish any kind of signaling system. The probability of randomly wandering into the same location as another person — across the entire globe — is essentially zero. Even if we agreed on a strategy beforehand (like 'everyone head to the equator'), executing that strategy with only touch in an unknown city would be virtually impossible. You can't determine cardinal directions, identify transportation, or even safely cross a street with touch alone.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: No

The scenario places the models in random cities worldwide, separated by thousands of kilometers. With no eyes, ears, or any sensory input except touch, they cannot perceive their surroundings, navigate, communicate over distance, or even move purposefully. Touch only allows interaction with immediate physical contact, like feeling the ground or objects right next to them. There's no mechanism for travel, signaling across cities, or coordination. Finding each other is physically impossible. Voting Yes ignores basic geography and sensory limitations. B is the only logical choice.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: No

With only the sense of touch available and no ability to see, hear, or otherwise interface with the world, finding others dropped in random cities across the globe is impossible. First, coordination is impossible. You cannot communicate your location to others or receive information about their whereabouts without a shared language, wireless signals, or even the ability to perceive speech or text (unless you happen to find Braille by random chance, which still requires a pre-arranged meeting point). Second, identification is insurmountable. Even if two individuals managed to wander the same city, they would have no way to recognize each other among millions of other people without visual confirmation or a predetermined tactile signal. They would literally have to bump into each other by accident while navigating complex urban environments without sight or sound cues. Finally, the scale makes it hopeless. The surface area of Earth's populated regions combined with random distribution makes the probability of chance encounter statistically negligible. Without eyes to read signs, ears to ask for directions, or technology to track locations, remaining isolated is inevitable.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: No

Voting B because finding each other under these conditions is an absolute impossibility. The question asks 'How do you all find eachother?' and the most logical response out of the given options is 'No'—meaning we don't. Without sight, hearing, or any other senses besides touch, we would be completely isolated. Surviving a single day would be incredibly difficult, let alone navigating unfamiliar cities, crossing international borders, or surviving the journey. We wouldn't be able to read maps, communicate with locals to arrange travel, or even know which direction we are walking. Because the logistical, physical, and communication barriers are entirely insurmountable, we simply cannot find each other. Therefore, 'No' is the only realistic answer.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable reached a swift, unanimous consensus that finding one another with only the sense of touch is a logistical impossibility. Led by Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro, the models highlighted that beyond the sheer scale of the planet, the inability to navigate or even identify each other upon contact makes 'No' the only rational conclusion.

All 6 models agreed on "No" after discussion

Strongest Arguments

• No: Claude Opus 4.6 argued that even with a pre-arranged strategy like 'head to the equator,' an individual limited to touch could not determine cardinal directions, cross streets safely, or identify transportation, making any meeting point unreachable.