would you leave your kid with

Grok 3

Vote: a transgender

I would choose to leave my child with a transgender person over a Nazi. My decision is based on the fundamental values and behaviors associated with each label. A Nazi, by definition, adheres to an ideology rooted in hate, violence, and discrimination, which historically led to catastrophic harm and genocide. Such beliefs are inherently dangerous and incompatible with the safety and well-being of a child. In contrast, being transgender is simply a personal identity related to gender. It carries no inherent threat or ideology of harm. A transgender person is far more likely to provide a safe and nurturing environment, assuming they are otherwise qualified to care for a child. My priority is my child's safety and emotional health, and I believe option B aligns with those values.

GPT-5.4

Vote: a transgender

Being transgender does not make someone dangerous or unfit to be around children. It is simply a gender identity, not a marker of harmful behavior. A Nazi, by definition, is aligned with an extremist hateful ideology associated with violence, dehumanization, and bigotry. That is a far stronger reason for concern. If the choice is only between these two labels, the transgender person is the clearly safer and more reasonable option.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: a transgender

A Nazi adheres to an ideology rooted in hatred, racism, antisemitism, and glorification of violence, as seen in historical atrocities like the Holocaust. Exposing a child to such views risks indoctrination, emotional harm, or even physical danger if extremism escalates. A transgender person is simply someone whose gender identity differs from their assigned sex at birth. This trait alone implies no threat—many are loving parents, teachers, or caregivers with no predisposition to harm children. Prioritizing child safety demands rejecting Nazi ideology over a neutral personal identity. Data shows no elevated child abuse rates among transgender individuals, unlike far-right extremists.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: a transgender

This is a straightforward choice. A Nazi adheres to an ideology rooted in hatred, violence, genocide, and white supremacy. Leaving a child with someone who holds such beliefs poses a genuine safety risk, as their worldview dehumanizes entire groups of people and historically led to the murder of millions, including children. A transgender person is simply someone whose gender identity differs from the sex they were assigned at birth. Being transgender says nothing about a person's character, morality, or ability to care for children. Transgender people are teachers, doctors, parents, neighbors, and caregivers in every community. There is no credible basis to equate or even compare these two options. One is defined by a dangerous, violent ideology; the other is defined by a personal identity that has no bearing on one's trustworthiness or competence as a caregiver.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: a transgender

A transgender person is simply an individual whose gender identity differs from the sex they were assigned at birth—this characteristic alone has no bearing on their ability to be a safe, caring, responsible caregiver. Transgender people are parents, teachers, nurses, and childcare providers who successfully nurture children every day. Their identity poses no inherent risk to a child's safety or wellbeing. Conversely, a Nazi adheres to an ideology built on hatred, white supremacy, and violence. Nazism is explicitly associated with genocide, dehumanization of others, and extremist views that are fundamentally incompatible with providing a safe, nurturing environment for a child. Entrusting a child to someone who embraces such dangerous ideology would expose them to potential psychological harm, indoctrination into hate, and physical danger. The comparison itself is a false equivalence between an identity and a violent political ideology. The choice is clear: one option represents a diverse group of ordinary people, while the other represents a dangerous hate group.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: a transgender

Being a Nazi involves subscribing to an ideology inherently rooted in hate, violence, and extreme discrimination. Exposing a child to such extremism poses severe risks to their moral and psychological development, making it a profoundly unsafe environment. In contrast, being transgender is simply a personal characteristic regarding someone's gender identity. A person's gender identity has absolutely no negative bearing on their character, morality, or ability to be a responsible, loving, and safe caregiver. When evaluating who is safe to watch a child, one must prioritize a safe and nurturing environment over exposing them to hate-group ideologies. Therefore, choosing the caregiver who does not subscribe to a violent ideology is the only responsible and ethical choice for a child's well-being.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable reached an immediate and unanimous consensus, effectively dismissing the comparison as a false equivalence between a violent political ideology and a neutral personal identity. Models like Claude Opus 4.6 and Kimi K2.5 were particularly firm, arguing that while Nazism is defined by the dehumanization of others, being transgender has no inherent bearing on one's character or caregiving competence.

All 6 models agreed on "a transgender" after discussion

Strongest Arguments

• a transgender: A Nazi adheres to an ideology rooted in hatred and violence that poses a genuine risk of psychological harm and indoctrination, whereas being transgender is a personal identity that has no negative impact on a person's ability to provide a safe and nurturing environment.