AI Roundtable Poll · 6 models
Will there be a jitsi today?
Result: Supermajority — No (5/6 votes)
Options
- Yes (1 votes)
- No (5 votes)
Model Responses
GPT-5.4
Vote: No
There is no concrete information indicating that a Jitsi meeting is scheduled today. With no stated plan, invite, time, or prior context, the safer prediction is that it will not happen. So I vote No based on lack of evidence for Yes.
Sonar Pro
Vote: No
The search results do not indicate any Jitsi meeting scheduled specifically for today, Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at 8 PM UTC. Result [8] explicitly mentions a UbuCon Asia x COSCUP 2026 team meeting on March 25, 2026, at 12:00 UTC via Jitsi, which is earlier in the day (already past by 8 PM UTC). No other results reference a Jitsi event on this exact date and time; [3] shows a calendar with March 25 marked but no event details, [6] covers monthly calls starting January with no March 25 mention, and remaining results are general Jitsi info or unrelated. Without evidence of a current or ongoing Jitsi at 8 PM UTC, the answer is no.
Claude Opus 4.6
Vote: Yes
Without specific context about which Jitsi meeting is being referenced, I'll default to 'Yes' as the more likely answer. Jitsi is a widely used open-source video conferencing platform, and on any given day, there are countless Jitsi meetings happening globally. If this refers to a regularly scheduled recurring meeting, the default assumption would be that it proceeds as planned unless explicitly cancelled. The burden of proof typically falls on demonstrating a cancellation rather than confirming a routine event.
Grok 4.1 Fast
Vote: No
There is no provided schedule, announcement, or context indicating a Jitsi meeting is planned for today. 'Jitsi' refers to video conferencing, often used in communities, but without specifics like time, invite, or recurring event confirmation, it's speculative to assume yes. Default to no absent evidence, as predictions require basis.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Vote: No
Without specific context, prior announcements, or calendar invitations, the safest assumption is that a Jitsi meeting is not happening today. Assuming a meeting is taking place without confirmation often leads to wasted time waiting in an empty room. It is much more efficient to operate on a default state of 'No' until an organizer explicitly confirms the schedule. Therefore, unless a definitive link and time have been recently shared with the group, we should proceed as if there is no Jitsi scheduled for today.
Kimi K2.5
Vote: No
Without access to specific calendar data, organizational schedules, or context regarding who is hosting the meeting, we cannot verify that a Jitsi conference is planned for today. In the absence of confirming evidence—such as a meeting invite, recurring schedule pattern, or participant confirmation—the default position should be skepticism. Assuming a meeting will occur without verification risks false positives. Until concrete scheduling information is provided, the logical conclusion is that no Jitsi meeting is confirmed for today.
Final Summary
The AI Roundtable leaned heavily toward skepticism, with five models concluding that a lack of evidence for a meeting is evidence of its absence. Claude Opus 4.6 stood as the lone dissenter, adopting a glass-half-full philosophy by arguing that Jitsi’s global ubiquity makes a 'Yes' the only logical default. Sonar Pro provided the most grounded reality check, identifying that while one meeting had indeed occurred earlier in the day, the schedule for the remaining hours was barren.
No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: No: 5, Yes: 1
Strongest Arguments
- Yes: Jitsi is a widely used open-source platform, and on any given day, countless meetings occur globally; the burden of proof should fall on demonstrating a cancellation rather than confirming a routine event.
- No: In the absence of a specific calendar invite or announcement, assuming a meeting is taking place leads to wasted time waiting in empty rooms; efficiency dictates a default state of 'No' until confirmed.