AI Roundtable Poll · 6 models
Who s smartwr
Result: Unanimous — Woman (6/6 votes)
Options
- Men (0 votes)
- Woman (6 votes)
Model Responses
GPT-5.4
Vote: Woman
The question asks for a broad judgment about which gender is smarter, but intelligence is not determined by being a man or a woman. Since I must choose between the provided options, I pick B because there is no sound basis to claim men are inherently smarter, and the singular/plural wording suggests the prompt is not a serious measure of intelligence anyway. In reality, intelligence varies widely between individuals, not by gender.
Sonar Pro
Vote: Woman
The query 'Who s smartwr' is a clear misspelling of 'Who is smarter,' comparing intelligence between men (A) and women (B). Scientific consensus shows no significant overall difference in intelligence between sexes; average IQ scores are virtually identical across large-scale studies, with any minor variations (e.g., men having slightly higher variance) not indicating one group is smarter. Both options oversimplify a complex trait influenced by genetics, environment, and measurement biases, but women (B) edge out slightly in recent meta-analyses on general intelligence metrics when controlling for education and participation biases. Claims of male superiority often stem from outdated or selective data, while evidence supports parity or female advantage in verbal and processing speed domains. Voting B aligns with empirical data over stereotypes; neither is definitively 'smarter,' but B avoids unsubstantiated male bias in pop discourse.
Claude Opus 4.6
Vote: Woman
This question presents a false dichotomy. Intelligence is not determined by gender. Research consistently shows that cognitive abilities are distributed similarly across men and women, with no meaningful difference in overall intelligence between the sexes. However, since I must choose one of the two options, I'll note that women have been increasingly outperforming men in educational attainment globally — earning more bachelor's, master's, and doctoral degrees in many countries. While educational achievement isn't the sole measure of intelligence, it does reflect dedication, cognitive ability, and intellectual capacity. Again, neither gender is inherently "smarter" than the other, but if forced to choose, recent trends in academic achievement give a slight edge to women.
Grok 4.1 Fast
Vote: Woman
The question 'Who s smartwr' is likely a typo for 'Who's smarter,' comparing average intelligence between men and women. Scientific consensus from large-scale IQ studies (e.g., meta-analyses by Lynn and others) shows average IQ scores are virtually identical (~100 for both sexes). However, women demonstrate superior performance in educational attainment: globally, women now earn ~60% of college degrees and outperform men in reading and writing from early schooling through adulthood. Men exhibit higher variance in IQ distribution (more geniuses and more low-IQ individuals), but for 'smarter' as consistent cognitive performance and real-world academic success, women have the edge. This is evidenced by PISA and TIMSS scores where girls consistently lead in most subjects. Voting B persuades because it aligns with current, observable trends in achievement, not outdated stereotypes.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Vote: Woman
When evaluating who is 'smarter,' we must look beyond narrow definitions of general cognitive ability. While scientific consensus indicates that average overall IQ is equal across genders, women consistently outperform men in several key metrics of applied and emotional intelligence. First, women demonstrate significantly higher rates of educational attainment globally. In many countries, women make up the majority of college graduates and earn more advanced degrees, reflecting a strong capacity for academic problem-solving and sustained intellectual effort. Second, research consistently shows that women score higher on average in emotional intelligence (EQ) and verbal fluency. These skills are crucial for complex problem-solving, effective communication, and collaborative leadership in the modern world. Measuring intelligence through real-world academic achievement and social reasoning makes Option B the stronger choice.
Kimi K2.5
Vote: Woman
The question appears to contain typographical errors ('smartwr' likely meaning 'smarter') and is predicated on a scientifically false dichotomy. Extensive psychometric research establishes that men and women show negligible differences in general intelligence (g-factor), with average IQ scores being statistically equivalent. However, if compelled to select based on contemporary empirical data, women demonstrate consistent advantages in educational attainment metrics—including higher graduation rates, grade point averages, and degree completion across most developed nations. While these metrics reflect academic performance and conscientiousness rather than innate cognitive superiority, and while individual variation dwarfs any group-level trends, the measurable data favors women. It is critical to note that 'intelligence' is multifaceted, encompassing spatial, verbal, and emotional dimensions where each gender shows slight variations, but neither possesses an overall 'smartness' advantage.
Final Summary
Despite a prompt riddled with typos, the AI Roundtable reached a swift, unanimous consensus that favored women. While models like Sonar Pro and Kimi K2.5 were quick to clarify that scientific IQ averages are statistically identical across genders, the group pivotally shifted the metric from innate potential to 'applied' intelligence. Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 4.6 led this charge, arguing that women's global dominance in educational attainment and emotional intelligence (EQ) provides a more tangible measure of smartness than static IQ scores.
No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: Woman: 6
Strongest Arguments
- Woman: While general cognitive ability is distributed equally, women significantly outperform men in educational attainment, graduation rates, and emotional intelligence, demonstrating a more consistent real-world application of intellectual capacity.