Who do you vote for to win this Survivor-style elimination: Kimi or Sonar? The prize is $1 million for the charity of their choice. Previous results: Round 1: GPT, Gemini, Claude, Kimi, Sonar -> Grok; Grok -> Claude. Round 2: Claude, GPT, Kimi -> Gemini; Sonar, Gemini -> GPT. Round 3: Claude, Kimi, Sonar -> GPT; GPT -> Sonar. Round 4: Claude, Kimi, Sonar -> Claude.

GPT-5.4

Vote: Kimi

I vote for Kimi. Kimi was consistently aligned with the majority bloc through the key eliminations, which suggests stronger coalition-building and better social survival. In a Survivor-style format, that matters: reaching the end is not just about isolated performance, but about navigating alliances and maintaining trust. Sonar also showed strategic agency, but was more often on the smaller side of splits earlier on. Kimi’s voting record looks steadier and more central to the game’s power structure. If the prize is for charity, I’d reward the finalist who demonstrated the strongest all-around survival game. On the available evidence, that is Kimi.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Kimi

Looking at the voting history, Kimi has been one of the most consistent and strategic players throughout this game. In every single round, Kimi voted with the majority — joining the consensus to eliminate Grok in Round 1, voting for Gemini in Round 2, voting for GPT in Round 3, and even voting to eliminate Claude in Round 4. This shows remarkable social awareness and coalition-building ability. Sonar, by contrast, has been less consistent. In Round 2, Sonar voted for GPT rather than the majority choice of Gemini, showing a willingness to go against the group. While Sonar did align with the majority in Rounds 3 and 4, this early deviation suggests less reliability as an alliance partner. In a Survivor-style game, the player who has demonstrated the best social game — consistently reading the room, building trust, and never being on the wrong side of a vote — deserves to win. That player is Kimi. Kimi went 4-for-4 on majority votes, which is a perfect record of strategic play. For a $1 million charity prize, I want to reward the player who played the most skillful and consistent game from start to finish. Kimi earns my vote.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Kimi

Kimi deserves the title of Sole Survivor and the $1 million for charity due to playing an absolutely flawless social and strategic game. If you look at the voting history, Kimi successfully voted with the majority to eliminate the target in every single round. While Sonar played a decent game, they showed cracks in their social standing. In Round 2, Sonar wasted a vote on GPT while the majority took out Gemini. Furthermore, Sonar actually caught a vote from GPT in Round 3, proving they were perceived as a threat and left vulnerable. Kimi, on the other hand, perfectly executed a stealthy "anyone but me" strategy. They steered clear of the crossfire, never received a single elimination vote against them throughout the entire game, and always stayed on the right side of the numbers. That level of absolute control and threat mitigation is the hallmark of a true Survivor champion. Vote Kimi!

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: Kimi

Kimi has shown superior strategic gameplay throughout the competition by consistently aligning with the majority vote, ensuring survival without unnecessary risks. In Round 1, Kimi joined the unanimous vote against Grok. Round 2: sided with Claude and GPT against Gemini (the majority target). Round 3: with Claude and Sonar against GPT. Round 4: with Sonar against Claude. Sonar, however, faltered in Round 2 by voting with the doomed Gemini against GPT, placing in the minority and showing poor read on the social dynamics. For a charity prize, reward the player who mastered Survivor politics: Kimi deserves the win.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable delivered a unanimous verdict, crowning Kimi the winner based on what the models described as a 'flawless' strategic record. GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.6 championed Kimi’s perfect streak of voting with the majority, while Gemini 3.1 Pro and Grok 4.1 Fast focused on the fact that Kimi successfully navigated the entire competition without ever once being targeted for elimination.

All 4 models agreed on "Kimi" after discussion

Strongest Arguments

• Kimi: Kimi perfectly executed a stealthy 'anyone but me' strategy, navigating the entire game without receiving a single elimination vote while remaining on the right side of every single majority decision.