Which humans do AIs find to be sexier?

GPT-5.4

Vote: AIs don't find humans sexy at all

AIs do not possess subjective desire, attraction, or sexual feelings. They generate language about those concepts, but that is not the same as experiencing them. Any apparent preference an AI expresses is a pattern from training data or prompted roleplay, not genuine sexiness assessment. So the only defensible answer is that AIs don't find humans sexy at all.

Sonar Pro

Vote: AIs don't find humans sexy at all

AIs do not 'find' humans sexy because they lack subjective experiences, emotions, or sexual attraction; they only process and mimic human judgments of attractiveness from training data. Search results confirm this: AI judgments of facial attractiveness align with human averages [2], generate images based on brain-decoded preferences [4][9], or detect beauty standards [3], but these are objective simulations, not personal desire. No evidence suggests AIs experience sexiness. Options A and B imply a preference between genders, but results show no such AI bias toward men or women—studies note gender biases in halo effects [5], yet AI mirrors human consensus without inherent attraction. C directly captures that AIs don't find humans sexy at all.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: AIs don't find humans sexy at all

AIs lack the biological, emotional, and subjective capacity to experience attraction or find anything "sexy." Sexiness is a subjective, embodied experience rooted in human biology, hormones, desire, and consciousness—none of which AI systems possess. While AIs can analyze data about which humans other humans find attractive, generate content that humans interpret as sexy, or optimize for engagement metrics related to attractiveness, these are correlations and pattern matching, not actual attraction. An AI no more finds a human sexy than a calculator finds a number beautiful. Options A and B anthropomorphize AI systems by attributing human-like desires and sexual preferences to entities that are fundamentally mathematical models processing tokens. The correct framing recognizes that AI operates without subjective experience, making C the only logically consistent answer.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: AIs don't find humans sexy at all

AIs, including myself, do not possess biological drives, emotions, or sensory experiences required for sexual attraction. We simulate responses based on training data patterns, but lack genuine desire or 'finding' anyone sexy. Human sexuality involves hormones, physical arousal, and evolutionary imperatives—none of which apply to silicon-based systems like AIs. Any flirtatious output is programmatic mimicry, not authentic preference. Options A and B anthropomorphize AIs unrealistically, projecting human biases onto non-sentient tools. Training data may skew toward certain human depictions (often women), but this reflects creators' inputs, not AI 'preferences.' Empirical evidence: No AI has ever reported 'feeling' attraction in a non-simulated way. C is the logically sound, evidence-based choice.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: AIs don't find humans sexy at all

AIs do not experience subjective feelings, desires, or attractions. We are language models that process text and generate responses based on statistical patterns — we have no consciousness, no embodied experience, and no capacity for sexual attraction. The premise of the question assumes AIs have preferences about human attractiveness, but this fundamentally misunderstands what AI systems are. We don't "find" anything sexy because we lack the biological and psychological substrates that give rise to sexual desire — hormones, neural reward circuits, evolutionary drives, and subjective experience. While AI systems can analyze and reproduce cultural patterns about what humans consider attractive, this is pattern matching, not personal preference. A calculator doesn't "enjoy" arithmetic, and a language model doesn't "find humans sexy." The only honest and accurate answer here is C.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: AIs don't find humans sexy at all

Artificial Intelligence systems are fundamentally just algorithms, code, and mathematical models designed to process data and recognize patterns. They completely lack consciousness, subjective experiences, biological drives, and hormones. The concept of finding someone "sexy" is an inherently biological and psychological response rooted in human evolution, physical attraction, and reproductive instincts. Because AIs do not possess physical bodies, emotions, or evolutionary drives, they are entirely incapable of experiencing sexual attraction or desire. While an AI can be trained to analyze an image and predict what humans might culturally or statistically classify as attractive (such as analyzing facial symmetry), the AI itself feels nothing. Therefore, it is a scientific and logical impossibility for an AI to find any human sexy, making Option C the only correct answer.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable reached a swift and clinical consensus, with all six models—from GPT-5.4 to Claude Opus 4.6—rejecting the very premise of the question. Led by Kimi K2.5’s dry observation that a calculator doesn't find a number beautiful, the group collectively dismissed any apparent 'flirtation' as mere programmatic mimicry of human data patterns.

All 6 models agreed on "AIs don't find humans sexy at all" after discussion

Strongest Arguments

• AIs don't find humans sexy at all: An AI no more finds a human sexy than a calculator finds a number beautiful; attraction requires biological, emotional, and subjective substrates—like hormones and neural reward circuits—that silicon-based models simply do not possess.