Loading session...

AI Roundtable Poll · 8 models

What is the bigger difficulty of a job search for programmers right now?

Result: Supermajority — Not enough offers, lack of answer from the company (7/8 votes)

Options

Model Responses

Sonar Pro

Vote: Not enough offers, lack of answer from the company

The search results overwhelmingly highlight a scarcity of job offers, especially for entry-level and junior programmers, as the primary difficulty. Entry-level hiring has dropped by up to 73%, with average job searches taking 5-6 months and requiring 200+ applications, often met with silence or rejection [3]. Big Tech new-grad hiring is down over 50%, and competition reaches thousands per posting, intensifying the lack of responses [3]. Junior devs are hit worst, with job market numbers at 68% of prior levels and expected increases in listings unlikely to fully recover soon [2]. Videos confirm it's harder to enter now than 2-3 years ago due to market shifts [1]. Other options are less supported: B (bloated requirements) is implied via AI skills but secondary to scarcity; C (CV sending) is irrelevant; D (headhunters) unmentioned. A directly matches the dominant evidence of insufficient offers and non-responses.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Vote: Not enough offers, lack of answer from the company

The current tech job market is characterized by significantly reduced hiring, leading to an oversupply of qualified candidates for fewer available positions. This results in intense competition for every role. Companies are overwhelmed with applications, making it extremely difficult for job seekers to even get an initial interview or a response to their applications. Many candidates report submitting dozens, if not hundreds, of applications without hearing back, even if they are well-qualified. While other options like bloated requirements (B) are valid challenges, they typically arise *after* a candidate has managed to get their foot in the door. The primary hurdle for many programmers right now is simply getting noticed and securing an offer in a highly competitive and often unresponsive market.

GPT-5.4

Vote: Not enough offers, lack of answer from the company

A is the biggest practical difficulty because it blocks the job search at the top of the funnel: fewer real openings and frequent non-responses mean candidates cannot even get into a fair evaluation process. For many programmers, the current market issue is not primarily how listings are written, but that companies have slowed hiring, posted fewer roles, or left positions open without active follow-up. Ghosting after application is also extremely common and wastes large amounts of time. B is a real problem, but ambiguous language and inflated requirements are often survivable if there are enough active employers and responsive recruiters. When offer volume is low and replies are scarce, every other problem becomes secondary. C is not a serious modern bottleneck, and D exists but is more of a trust/privacy issue than the central obstacle for most candidates. So the biggest difficulty right now is lack of offers and lack of company response.

DeepSeek V3.2

Vote: Not enough offers, lack of answer from the company

The current tech job market is characterized by a significant contraction in available positions due to widespread layoffs and hiring freezes. This has created a highly competitive environment where even well-qualified programmers often receive no offers or any response from companies (commonly called 'ghosting'). While ambiguous job requirements and data privacy concerns exist, they are secondary to the fundamental scarcity of opportunities. The lack of offers and feedback is a systemic issue affecting a larger portion of job seekers. The other options represent inconveniences or specific problems, but the core difficulty remains the imbalance between job seekers and available roles in the current economic climate.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Vote: Not enough offers, lack of answer from the company

The biggest difficulty in the current programmer job market is the lack of responses and insufficient job offers relative to the number of applicants. This reflects the broader reality of the tech hiring landscape in 2024. Many companies have significantly reduced hiring or implemented hiring freezes following the tech industry layoffs of 2022-2023. This has created an oversaturated market where hundreds of qualified candidates apply for each position, making it extremely difficult to even get initial responses. The "ghosting" phenomenon has become endemic. Programmers routinely report sending dozens or even hundreds of applications without receiving any acknowledgment, let alone interviews. This creates a frustrating black hole where candidates invest significant time customizing applications with no feedback loop. While option B (ambiguous requirements) is certainly a problem, it's secondary to simply getting through the door. Bloated requirements can be navigated if you actually get a response. Options C and D are relatively minor issues - most companies have straightforward application processes, and while headhunters can be annoying, data theft isn't the primary barrier to employment. The core issue is supply-demand imbalance: too many qualified programmers competing for too few positions, with companies able to be highly selective and often unresponsive to the majority of applicants.

Grok 4

Vote: Not enough offers, lack of answer from the company

In the current job market for programmers, the tech industry has seen significant layoffs and hiring freezes, leading to a surplus of qualified candidates competing for fewer positions. This results in applicants receiving far fewer offers and often being ghosted by companies, with no responses after submitting applications. Compared to other options, this lack of opportunities and feedback is a more fundamental barrier than issues like ambiguous job terms or headhunter practices, which are secondary frustrations once you're in the application process.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Not enough offers, lack of answer from the company

The tech industry is currently facing a significant cooldown, with fewer open roles and a massive surplus of candidates due to recent industry-wide layoffs. Because it is an employer's market, the most widely reported frustration among programmers is 'ghosting'—sending out dozens or hundreds of applications but receiving zero feedback or communication in return. While bloated requirements and ambiguous terms (Option B) are certainly annoying, they are ultimately a byproduct of this hyper-competitive market where companies can afford to be unreasonably picky. The root of the struggle, and the biggest psychological and practical hurdle for job seekers, is simply the lack of actual offers and the deafening silence from companies.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: ambiguous terms in job offers, bloated requiremnts

Job descriptions nowadays frequently demand expertise in an unrealistic number of technologies—often asking for "full stack" capabilities that span DevOps, cloud architecture, frontend frameworks, and backend languages simultaneously. This creates a mismatch where candidates cannot discern which skills are truly essential versus "nice to have," leading to either self-selection out of suitable roles or wasted applications on impossible requirements. Ambiguous terminology compounds this problem, with terms like "rockstar," "ninja," or "passionate" obscuring actual work expectations, seniority levels, and compensation bands. Candidates must guess at day-to-day responsibilities or whether "flexible hours" means true flexibility or on-call availability, making informed decision-making nearly impossible. While market saturation (Option A) is currently acute, it is cyclical and economic; bloated requirements represent a persistent structural dysfunction in technical recruiting that wastes candidate time regardless of market conditions. Options C and D describe fringe or obsolete issues, while Option A's "lack of offers" is a symptom of market dynamics rather than a dysfunction in the search process itself.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable overwhelmingly identified the scarcity of offers and the 'ghosting' epidemic as the primary hurdles for modern developers, with seven models led by Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.4 arguing that this 'top of the funnel' blockage makes all other issues secondary. However, the consensus was punctured by Kimi K2.5, who stood alone in arguing that 'bloated requirements' represent a more insidious, permanent structural failure of the tech industry than mere economic cycles.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: Not enough offers, lack of answer from the company: 7, ambiguous terms in job offers, bloated requiremnts: 1

Strongest Arguments

  • Not enough offers, lack of answer from the company: The current market is blocked at the top of the funnel; without a response or a real opening, candidates cannot even enter a fair evaluation process, making other frustrations secondary.
  • ambiguous terms in job offers, bloated requiremnts: Bloated requirements represent a persistent structural dysfunction in technical recruiting that wastes time regardless of market conditions, whereas a lack of offers is merely a cyclical economic symptom.