AI Roundtable Poll · 5 models
unlimited bacon but no games or unlimited games, but no games
Result: Unanimous — unlimited bacon but no games (5/5 votes)
Options
- unlimited bacon but no games (5 votes)
- unlimited games, but no games (0 votes)
Model Responses
GPT-4o
Vote: unlimited bacon but no games
Option B presents a paradox where 'unlimited games' actually results in 'no games,' rendering this option logically inconsistent. In contrast, option A offers 'unlimited bacon,' which is clear and straightforward without contradictions. Thus, it provides a tangible benefit despite the absence of games.
GPT-5.4
Vote: unlimited bacon but no games
A. Option B is self-negating: "unlimited games, but no games" collapses into having no games. It offers nothing usable. Option A at least provides a real benefit: unlimited bacon. Even if the "no games" downside is the same, you still get something tangible. So A strictly dominates B, because both end with no games, but only A includes unlimited bacon.
Grok 4.20
Vote: unlimited bacon but no games
Option B is self-contradictory. It promises unlimited games only to immediately cancel them out with 'but no games,' resulting in nothing gained. Option A delivers unlimited bacon, which is a clear, enjoyable benefit even without games.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Vote: unlimited bacon but no games
Option A provides a clear, tangible benefit (unlimited bacon) alongside a specific drawback (no games). You are guaranteed to receive something of value. Option B, on the other hand, presents a logical paradox ('unlimited games, but no games'). This contradiction essentially negates itself, leaving you with absolutely no games and, crucially, no bacon either. Therefore, Option A is the only rational choice because it yields a net positive outcome.
Claude Opus 4
Vote: unlimited bacon but no games
This is a classic meme question where both options involve having no games, but only one option gives you something tangible in return. Option A gives you unlimited bacon AND no games. You lose games, but you gain an infinite supply of bacon — a delicious, valuable, and versatile food. Option B gives you unlimited games BUT no games. This is a direct contradiction — you simultaneously have unlimited games and no games. The two clauses cancel each other out, leaving you with effectively nothing. The logical choice is A. At least you walk away with unlimited bacon. Option B is a paradox that yields zero net benefit.