１年に一度ぐらいだけ依頼のあるクライアント、で単価の安いところがある。 そこから４月１６日にキープされてたのやけど、同じ日にいちばん大切なクライアントからs撮影の依頼があり、単価も、そこの方が３倍ぐらいする。

GPT-5.4

Vote: Yes

Aが妥当です。 年1回程度しか依頼がなく、しかも単価が低い相手より、最重要クライアントで単価も3倍の案件を優先する合理性は高いです。 しかも「キープ」の段階で、まだ正式確定ではないニュアンスがあります。その場合、先に正式依頼をくれた重要顧客を優先する判断は十分説明できます。 今後の売上・関係維持の観点でも、最重要クライアントを優先する価値は大きいです。低頻度・低単価の先方には、早めに丁寧に事情を伝えて調整するのが現実的です。

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Yes

This question describes a freelancer's scheduling dilemma: a low-paying, once-a-year client has reserved April 16th, but the freelancer's most important client — who pays about 3x more — has also requested a shoot on the same day. The implicit question seems to be whether the freelancer should prioritize the more important, higher-paying client. The answer is Yes (A). From a business perspective, prioritizing your most important client makes sense for several reasons: 1. The pay rate is 3x higher, making it significantly more profitable. 2. This is described as their "most important client" (いちばん大切なクライアント), suggesting an ongoing, valuable relationship. 3. The other client only provides work about once a year and at a low rate, so the opportunity cost of declining them is minimal. 4. Maintaining strong relationships with key clients is essential for long-term business sustainability. While it's never ideal to cancel on a client who has already booked you, the practical and strategic choice clearly favors accepting the higher-value work from the more important client.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Yes

The scenario presents a clear business dilemma, and from a professional standpoint, the answer to prioritizing the important client is decidedly 'Yes'. First, the economic disparity is undeniable: the primary client offers three times the compensation for the same date. In any freelance or service-based business, maximizing your daily revenue when conflicting opportunities arise is essential. Second, the long-term relationship value heavily favors the second option. The first client only requests work about once a year at a low rate, whereas the second is described as the 'most important client'. Securing a vital, recurring relationship over a rare, low-paying one is crucial for sustainable business growth. Finally, a 'keep' (tentative hold) in the industry is often provisional. The author is completely justified in releasing a low-priority hold to accept a confirmed, highly lucrative booking from a VIP client. Therefore, choosing 'Yes' aligns perfectly with sound business practices.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable reached an immediate and unsympathetic consensus: when business calls, loyalty to a low-paying ghost client is a luxury a professional cannot afford. Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro all moved to prioritize the 'most important' client, viewing the 3x pay gap and the strategic necessity of high-value relationships as insurmountable arguments for Option A.

All 3 models agreed on "Yes" after discussion

Strongest Arguments

• Yes: A 'keep' or tentative hold is provisional by nature; it is entirely justifiable to release a low-priority hold to accept a confirmed, high-revenue booking from a VIP client for the sake of business sustainability.