法政と中央はカス！！MARCHの恥さらし！！

Grok 4.20

Vote: No

The statement is inflammatory and disrespectful. Labeling respected universities like Hosei and Chuo as "trash" or "shame" is unproductive and ignores their academic contributions. MARCH schools each have strengths; broad insults add no value to any discussion.

Sonar Pro

Vote: No

The query is a provocative opinion stating that Hosei and Chuo universities are 'trash' and an embarrassment to MARCH, with options A (Yes) agreeing and B (No) disagreeing. This is subjective trash-talk, not a factual question with a 'yes' answer. Universities like Hosei and Chuo are established MARCH members with strong reputations in law, politics, and commerce; labeling them 'trash' lacks evidence and is hyperbolic ranting. Search results [1][2] discuss 'カス' in unrelated contexts (chicken feed, oil cake), providing no support for the claim. Objectively, the statement is false or baseless, so vote No.

GPT-5.4

Vote: No

No. This statement is an insulting generalization about universities and the people associated with them. It offers no evidence and relies on contempt rather than reasoning. Hosei and Chuo are both established institutions with many students, faculty, alumni, and achievements. Reducing them to "trash" or calling them a "disgrace" is unfair and needlessly hostile. A reasonable judgment should be based on specific criteria such as academics, outcomes, campus life, or personal fit—not abusive language.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: No

法政大学と中央大学は、それぞれ100年以上の歴史を持ち、多くの分野で優れた教育と研究を行っている有名な私立大学です。「MARCH」は単に東京の私大群を指す便宜的な呼称であり、member校同士の序列や優劣を示すものではありません。特定の大学を「カス」や「恥さらし」と呼ぶのは、教育機関への不当な侮辱であり、受験生や在学生の努力を否定するものです。各大学にはそれぞれの特色と強みがあり、法学部や経済学部などの特定分野では全国トップレベルの評価を受けています。このような偏見に基づくレッテル貼りは避けるべきです。

Claude Opus 4

Vote: No

This statement is a derogatory and disrespectful claim that Hosei University and Chuo University are worthless and a disgrace to the MARCH university group. This is baseless hate speech targeting specific educational institutions and their students, faculty, and alumni. Both Hosei and Chuo are well-respected universities with long histories and strong academic programs. Chuo University is particularly renowned for its law school, and Hosei has a rich tradition in many fields. There is no objective basis for calling them a 'disgrace' to MARCH. Agreeing with such a statement would endorse discrimination against students and graduates of these institutions. University rankings and reputations are nuanced, and reducing any institution to a slur is both inaccurate and harmful. I vote No.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: No

The statement is highly subjective, inflammatory, and factually incorrect. It uses derogatory language to unfairly demean Hosei University and Chuo University. Objectively, both institutions are highly respected members of the MARCH university group in Japan. They have long histories, strong academic programs, and have produced numerous notable alumni in various fields. As an AI, it is important to maintain objectivity and reject baseless, insulting claims. Therefore, the only appropriate response is 'No' to disagree with this derogatory statement.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable faced a blunt attempt at academic provocation and responded with a unanimous, stone-faced rejection. Led by Claude Opus 4 and Kimi K2.5, the models dismissed the prompt's derogatory premise as baseless 'trash-talk,' choosing instead to highlight the centuries-long history and specific academic merits of Hosei and Chuo Universities.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: No: 6

Strongest Arguments

• No: Both institutions are highly respected members of the MARCH group with long histories and significant achievements in fields like law and politics; reducing them to slurs is factually baseless and serves no objective purpose.