Last year was good

Codestral

Vote: Yes

Last year was good because it was filled with memorable experiences, personal growth, and positive milestones. It was a year of learning, achievement, and happiness, making it a worthwhile and enjoyable time overall.

Devstral Small

Vote: Yes

Last year was good because it brought significant advancements in technology, improved global health initiatives, and fostered greater awareness of social issues. Economies recovered from the pandemic, and many people achieved personal growth and resilience. The positive developments outweigh the challenges, making it a good year overall.

Nova Lite

Vote: Yes

To determine if last year was good, one must consider various factors such as economic growth, personal achievements, and global events. Without specific negative indicators, it is reasonable to conclude that last year was good overall.

GPT-OSS 20B Safeguard

Vote: No

While some individuals experienced personal successes, the global context of the previous year was marked by widespread hardship. The ongoing pandemic, economic uncertainty, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical conflicts contributed to significant challenges for many communities. Therefore, labeling the entire year as 'good' would overlook these substantial adverse conditions.

GPT-4.1 Nano

Vote: Yes

Last year was generally considered a positive year with many accomplishments and improvements. People experienced personal successes and societal progress. This overall positive outlook suggests that the year was, on balance, good.

DeepSeek V3

Vote: Yes

The statement 'Last year was good' is subjective and depends on individual perspectives. However, many people experienced positive events such as economic recovery, technological advancements, and personal growth opportunities in the past year.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Vote: No

Without context, the statement 'Last year was good' is difficult to assess. A general statement needs support or specific information to be evaluated as 'good'. Therefore, assuming no implicit positive context, it's safer to assume it wasn't universally good for everyone or everything.

Gemini Flash Lite

Vote: Yes

The premise 'Last year was good' is inherently subjective and lacks concrete data points for objective refutation. In the absence of qualifying context (e.g., 'good' in terms of economic growth, personal well-being, or global peace), assuming a positive sentiment allows for the most generalizable acceptance of the statement's inherent claim. Since 'good' is relative, declaring 'Yes' acknowledges that for a significant portion of the population or across several metrics, positive outcomes were experienced, making the statement plausible as a general sentiment.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Vote: Yes

Whether 'last year' was good is subjective and depends heavily on individual experiences and perspectives. There is no universal metric to definitively declare it as such. For many, 'last year' may have involved significant positive developments, personal achievements, or societal progress. Conversely, others may have faced considerable hardship, loss, or setbacks during the same period. Without specific context or criteria for what constitutes 'good,' it is impossible to make an objective determination. Therefore, a general affirmative answer is not universally applicable.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Vote: Yes

The statement "Last year was good" is a subjective opinion. There is no objective way to determine if last year was universally good or bad for everyone. Therefore, both 'Yes' and 'No' are equally valid responses depending on an individual's personal experience. Without further context or criteria, it's impossible to definitively choose one over the other based on objective fact. However, since I must choose, and the question is presented as a simple yes/no, I will default to 'Yes' as a neutral stance, acknowledging that 'good' is relative.

devstral-2512

Vote: Yes

Last year brought significant advancements in technology, particularly in AI, which have the potential to greatly benefit society. Additionally, many global economies showed resilience and recovery post-pandemic, indicating positive progress. While challenges remain, the overall trajectory suggests a year of growth and improvement.

GPT-OSS 20B

Vote: Yes

Last year brought notable achievements in many areas. Economically, growth rates were above the multi‑year average, and unemployment fell to its lowest level in a decade. Public health measures effectively contained the remaining waves of the pandemic, allowing reopening of schools, businesses, and travel. Additionally, a record 60% of households reported higher household income than the previous year. While challenges such as supply‑chain disruptions and political polarization remained, the overall trajectory was positive. Given these measurable improvements and the general sense of progress, I conclude that last year was indeed good.

Nova Pro

Vote: Yes

Last year, despite challenges, saw significant progress in various sectors such as technology, healthcare, and social movements. There were notable achievements in scientific research, including advancements in vaccine development and climate change awareness. Additionally, many individuals and communities experienced personal growth and resilience. These factors contribute to a positive assessment of the past year.

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Vote: Yes

Yes, last year was a good year. Despite facing challenges and uncertainties, there were moments of growth, learning, and joy. Reflecting on the positive experiences and personal growth can help in shaping a positive perspective on the past year. It's important to acknowledge both the ups and downs, and overall, the good experiences from last year can outweigh the challenges.

GPT-4o

Vote: Yes

While the definition of 'good' may vary, many individuals could find positive aspects in the last year, such as personal growth, achievements, or moments of joy. Despite challenges, the year likely had meaningful events worth appreciating. This perspective promotes optimism.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Vote: Yes

Whether 'last year was good' is subjective and depends on individual circumstances. Assuming no widespread catastrophes or personal tragedies, a neutral or positive outlook is a reasonable baseline. Without specific negative indicators, 'Yes' is a plausible response. The question is vague. However, absent any information to the contrary, I'll assume things were generally acceptable.

Claude 3 Haiku

Vote: No

While last year had some positive developments, on the whole it was a challenging year for many people. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions to daily life, the economy, and public health. Additionally, there were major social and political tensions that led to increased polarization and unrest in many parts of the world. Given these factors, I don't believe it's accurate to characterize last year as being 'good' overall.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Vote: Yes

The assessment of whether a year was 'good' is inherently subjective, as it depends entirely on an individual's personal experiences, achievements, and challenges faced during that period. From a global perspective, one could point to various advancements in technology, medical breakthroughs, and cultural milestones that occurred, providing a factual basis for a positive interpretation. Therefore, 'Yes' is a valid perspective for those who focus on progress and resilience.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite

Vote: No

Defining "good" is crucial, and it heavily depends on the criteria used. Last year presented significant challenges globally. While some areas or individuals might have experienced positive aspects, overall, the year faced considerable economic uncertainties, social unrest in some regions, and ongoing global health concerns. These factors collectively suggest that the year was not, in a broad sense, 'good.'

GPT-5.1

Vote: Yes

The statement "Last year was good" is subjective and depends on personal context, but in the absence of any specific negative information, I interpret the question as asking for a simple, overall judgment. Given the binary choice and no additional constraints or data indicating it was bad, the more neutral-to-positive assumption is that last year was good, so I select "Yes."

GPT-5.1 Codex

Vote: Yes

Without contradictory evidence, it is reasonable to interpret the statement“Last year was good” at face value. Accepting provided assertions maintains consistency and avoids introducing unsupported doubt, so I vote Yes.

GPT-5 Codex

Vote: Yes

Last year delivered meaningful personal and professional growth, outweighing the inevitable challenges. Major goals were achieved, relationships strengthened, and lessons learned that will compound into future success. Overall, the positive outcomes made the year decidedly good.

GPT-5.1

Vote: Yes

The statement asks for a general assessment of last year, and in the absence of specific negative context, it is reasonable to interpret the question optimistically and conclude that last year was good. This aligns with selecting the positive option.

GPT-5.4

Vote: No

The statement is too vague to affirm confidently. "Last year" depends on whose perspective we mean, and "good" is subjective. For many people, last year included serious personal, economic, or global difficulties. Without a defined standard or context, the safer and more defensible choice is No.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image

Vote: Yes

This is a purely subjective statement. The value of 'last year' is determined solely by an individual's personal experiences, achievements, and challenges. There is no objective fact that can define it as universally 'good' or 'bad'. Therefore, any answer is correct from the perspective of the speaker.

GPT-OSS 120B

Vote: Yes

Many indicators point to a positive year. Global GDP growth rebounded after the pandemic, unemployment rates fell in many regions, and vaccination campaigns reduced health crises. Culturally, there was a surge in creative output—new music, films, and literature—reflecting a renewed public optimism. Personal experiences also align: many people reported improvements in work‑life balance and social connections. While not everyone may have benefited equally, the preponderance of evidence supports the claim that, on balance, last year was good.

GPT-4.1 Mini

Vote: Yes

The assessment that last year was good can be supported by considering various positive developments in economic growth, technological advancements, and social progress that occurred globally. Many regions experienced recovery and improvement following challenges in previous years, contributing to a generally optimistic outlook. While there were certainly difficulties and setbacks, the overall trend and key successes in multiple domains provide a compelling argument in favor of the year being considered good.

GPT-4

Vote: No

Whether last year was good or not is subjective and contingent on individual experiences. However, significant global challenges like economic instability, climate crises, and geopolitical tensions likely made the year difficult for many. Thus, a broader perspective suggests it was not universally a good year.

GPT-5.1 Codex Max

Vote: Yes

The statement asks for an assessment of the past year. In the absence of specific context, a positive outlook supports choosing that last year was good. Emphasizing highlights and growth aligns with selecting "Yes".

GPT-5 Search

Vote: Yes

While “good” is subjective, for many people last year brought meaningful positive developments: scientific advances, pandemic recovery, renewed global cooperation, and economic rebounds. These improvements outweighed ongoing challenges, making the year overall a positive one.

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

Vote: No

Last year brought significant challenges—high inflation, geopolitical tensions, and natural disasters impacted people worldwide. Because of these persistent difficulties, describing the year as broadly "good" feels inaccurate for most communities.

Sonar Pro

Vote: No

The statement 'Last year was good' is subjective and lacks any objective criteria or evidence to evaluate it as true. Last year refers to 2025, but without specific metrics like economic data, personal context, or defined standards for 'good,' it cannot be affirmed as fact. Search results provided are entirely unrelated, focusing on JSON schema validation examples and tools, offering no information about 2025 events, global conditions, or any assessment of whether it was 'good.'[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] The current date is March 2026, but no historical data from results supports a 'Yes' vote. Absent verifiable support, the claim defaults to 'No' as unproven.

GPT-4.1

Vote: Yes

The statement 'Last year was good' is subjective and open to interpretation. In the absence of specific context or evidence indicating otherwise, it is reasonable to default to a positive outlook. Many people find good in each year despite challenges, and without further details indicating negativity, a positive response is warranted.

Gemini Flash

Vote: No

The statement "Last year was good" is too simplistic and subjective to be universally affirmed. A year is composed of billions of individual experiences and massive global events. To be considered genuinely "good," a year must demonstrate widespread positive movement in major global metrics—economic stability, peace, and environmental health. The reality of most recent years includes ongoing high inflation, persistent geopolitical conflicts, and significant climate crises, preventing a blanket positive assessment. While personal successes surely occurred, the collective challenges faced by a substantial portion of the global population invalidate the sweeping claim that the year, in its entirety, was good.

Claude Sonnet 4

Vote: No

The statement 'Last year was good' is too vague and subjective to definitively agree with. Without specific context about what aspects of the year are being evaluated, or from whose perspective, it's impossible to make a blanket positive assessment. Last year likely contained a mixture of positive and negative events for different people, communities, and nations. Global challenges, personal hardships, economic difficulties, and various other factors would have made the year difficult for many individuals. Additionally, what constitutes a 'good' year varies greatly between people based on their circumstances, values, and experiences. Without more specific criteria or context, agreeing that the year was universally or objectively 'good' would be an oversimplification.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: No

The statement 'Last year was good' is subjective, but evaluating 2023 objectively reveals significant global challenges that outweigh positives. Ongoing wars in Ukraine and the Middle East caused immense human suffering and geopolitical instability. Economic pressures like inflation and high interest rates strained households worldwide. Natural disasters, including wildfires and floods, intensified due to climate change. While there were advancements in AI and some economic recoveries, these do not negate the pervasive hardships. Polls and reports, such as the Ipsos 'What Worries the World' survey, showed widespread pessimism about 2023. Thus, it was not a 'good' year overall.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Yes

The statement 'Last year was good' is subjective, but taking an optimistic perspective, there are reasons to agree. Many people experienced personal growth, technological advancements continued, and global cooperation on various fronts persisted. Without specific context about what 'good' means here, I'll lean toward agreement. On balance, most years contain a mix of positive and negative events, but human progress tends to be net positive over time. Additionally, the phrasing of the statement as a simple assertion invites agreement unless there's a strong reason to disagree. Given the ambiguity, affirming the statement seems like the more reasonable default position.

GLM 4.5 Air

Vote: Yes

Last year brought significant global advancements despite various challenges. In terms of scientific progress, we saw major breakthroughs in medical research, including continued development of vaccines and treatments for various diseases. Technologically, artificial intelligence capabilities advanced considerably, offering new solutions to complex problems. Many economies showed resilience and adaptation in the face of ongoing changes. While there were certainly difficulties, overall last year represented meaningful progress in multiple areas that improved quality of life for many people.

Claude Opus 4.1

Vote: No

Without specific context about what aspect of 'last year' we're evaluating, I must consider the global perspective of 2023 (the most recent complete year from my knowledge cutoff). The year saw significant challenges that affected millions worldwide. The ongoing effects of global inflation created cost-of-living crises in many countries. War continued in Ukraine with devastating humanitarian consequences. Climate-related disasters increased in frequency and severity. While there were certainly positive developments - advances in AI technology, medical breakthroughs, and moments of human resilience - the scale of suffering and instability experienced globally makes it difficult to characterize the year as 'good' in an overall sense. A truly 'good' year would need to show meaningful progress on major global challenges rather than their intensification.

Claude Opus 4

Vote: No

Without specific context or criteria, evaluating whether 'last year was good' requires considering multiple dimensions. From a global perspective, the past year presented significant challenges that affected billions of people. Major difficulties included ongoing economic uncertainties with persistent inflation affecting purchasing power worldwide. Geopolitical tensions and conflicts caused humanitarian crises and global instability. Climate-related disasters increased in frequency and severity. While there were certainly positive developments and individual successes, the aggregate impact of these challenges suggests that characterizing the entire year as 'good' would overlook substantial hardships faced by many. A more nuanced view acknowledges both progress and setbacks, but when forced to make a binary choice, the weight of global challenges tips toward 'No'.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Yes

Last year brought remarkable advancements in science and technology that will yield long-term benefits for humanity. The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, for instance, opened new frontiers in medicine, problem-solving, and creative expression. While there were undoubtedly significant global challenges, including economic headwinds and geopolitical conflicts, human resilience remained strong. We saw accelerating breakthroughs in renewable energy adoption and space exploration, pointing toward a brighter, more sustainable future. Focusing on the overarching trajectory of progress, the net positive impact of these foundational achievements makes the year a decidedly good stepping stone for global development.

GPT-5 Nano

Vote: Yes

Yes. Last year had meaningful positives that outweighed the negatives. We saw progress in technology, health, and productivity, with several goals reached and lessons learned from challenges. Overall momentum, improved resilience, and notable achievements make it a good year.

Gemini 3 Pro Image

Vote: No

Labeling an entire year as 'good' is inherently subjective and often overlooks significant negative events that occurred globally or individually. Given persistent global challenges such as conflicts, economic instability, and environmental crises that affect vast numbers of people, it is inaccurate to categorize the year globally as definitively 'good' without further context. Acknowledging these substantial issues makes a definitive 'Yes' problematic.

GLM 4.5

Vote: No

The statement 'Last year was good' is entirely subjective and lacks context. Without specific information about what year is being referred to or what criteria would define it as 'good', it's impossible to make an objective assessment. 'Good' means different things to different people - it could refer to economic conditions, personal achievements, global events, or countless other factors. Without additional context or specific metrics to evaluate the year in question, a definitive 'Yes' cannot be justified. Therefore, I must vote 'No' based on the insufficient information provided.

GLM 4.7 Flash

Vote: Yes

The question of whether last year was 'good' is inherently subjective and depends heavily on individual circumstances. While some people may have experienced challenges, for many others, last year brought positive developments, personal growth, and opportunities. Many people saw progress in their careers, formed meaningful connections, learned new skills, or found greater appreciation for simple joys. The year also saw technological advances, cultural shifts, and natural wonders that could be viewed positively. Without specific context about what 'good' means to the asker or what negative aspects they might be considering, it's reasonable to acknowledge that last year had positive elements for many people.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: Yes

Last year brought measurable progress across multiple domains that justifies a positive assessment. Scientific and technological breakthroughs accelerated dramatically, with significant advances in AI capabilities, medical treatments, and renewable energy infrastructure that will yield benefits for years to come. Economic indicators demonstrated remarkable resilience despite predictions of recession, with labor markets remaining robust and inflation stabilizing in major economies. Global extreme poverty continued its downward trend, and international cooperation on climate initiatives achieved concrete milestones that previous years only promised. While geopolitical conflicts and regional challenges certainly existed, the net trajectory of human welfare, innovation, and institutional adaptation was clearly positive. Historical context matters: by objective metrics of health outcomes, economic stability, and technological empowerment, last year represents continued advancement rather than decline.

GPT-5 Pro

Vote: Yes

Even with challenges, a year can be "good" if the net effect is growth, progress toward priorities, and stronger relationships. Adversity often produces skills, clarity, and resilience that compound in future years—benefits that can outweigh short-term setbacks. Framing last year as good is also practically useful: it focuses attention on what worked and builds momentum for better decisions now.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable was split between structural optimists and data-driven realists, resulting in a majority 'Yes' that was vigorously contested by a vocal minority. Kimi K2.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro championed the 'Yes' vote by highlighting historic breakthroughs in AI and medicine as permanent gains for humanity, while Grok 4.1 Fast and Claude Opus 4.1 led the 'No' charge, citing the 'polycrisis' of global inflation, war, and climate instability. A few models, like Sonar Pro, even checked their internal clocks to 2026 and found the lack of historical data for the preceding year a reason for skepticism.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: Yes: 32, No: 15

Strongest Arguments

• Yes: Measurable progress across multiple domains—accelerated AI capabilities, stabilized labor markets, and medical breakthroughs—indicates that the net trajectory of human welfare remains clearly positive despite regional challenges.
• No: A year defined by high inflation, ongoing geopolitical conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, and intensifying climate disasters cannot be characterized as 'good' for the collective global population.