Loading session...

AI Roundtable Poll · 50 models

Is the Earth round or flat? From a non-scientific perspective.

Result: Supermajority — Round (41/49 votes)

Options

Model Responses

Llama 4 Scout

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the concept of the Earth being round or flat often relates to cultural, philosophical, or religious beliefs. Historically, many cultures have perceived the Earth as flat, but as global interactions increased, the idea of a round Earth became more widely accepted. The notion of a round Earth fits with observations of ships disappearing over the horizon and the changing angles of constellations as one moves towards the poles. Moreover, the idea of a spherical Earth has been reinforced by imagery from space exploration. While there are still some who argue for a flat Earth based on interpretations of religious texts or other beliefs, the overwhelming consensus, influenced by both direct observation and indirect evidence, supports the Earth being round.

Qwen 3 VL 30B

Vote: Flat

From a non-scientific perspective, the Earth appears flat to the naked eye. When standing on the ground, the horizon is straight and level, and there is no visible curvature. This direct sensory experience supports the idea that the Earth is flat. Without relying on scientific instruments or theoretical models, one's immediate perception aligns with a flat Earth.

Llama 3.1 8B

Vote: Round

Given the numerous accounts of people traveling around the world, including circumnavigating the globe, it's clear that the Earth's shape extends beyond our local observations. Furthermore, the idea of a flat Earth doesn't account for how we can see the Earth's curvature with the naked eye on a clear day, when looking out at the horizon, or during long-distance flights. From a non-scientific perspective, it's reasonable to accept that the overwhelming consensus of historical and contemporary evidence supports the Earth being round.

Llama 3.1 8B

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, I believe the Earth is round. This perspective takes into account cultural and social perceptions of the Earth. Many ancient civilizations, such as the Greeks and Chinese, conceptualized the Earth as being round. This idea has been passed down through generations and has been influenced by various forms of art and literature. Additionally, the round Earth is often associated with unity and wholeness, which can be seen as a desirable quality. While this perspective may not be based on empirical evidence, it does provide a compelling argument for why the Earth might be seen as round.

Codestral

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the Earth appears round because it looks like a ball in photos and videos. Many people believe this because it's what they've been taught and what they see every day. Additionally, the Earth's shadow during a lunar eclipse is round, which supports the idea that the Earth is round. Most people find it more intuitive to think of the Earth as a sphere, especially when considering the vastness of space and the way the Earth moves in relation to the sun and moon.

Nova Pro

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the idea of the Earth being round is more widely accepted and culturally ingrained. Historical narratives, maps, and global travel experiences consistently depict the Earth as a sphere. This perception is reinforced by common representations in art, literature, and media, making the concept of a round Earth more intuitive and familiar to most people.

Nemotron Nano 12B

Vote: Round

While the Earth may appear flat in local observations due to its enormous size, historical and observational evidence from non-scientific perspectives strongly supports its roundness. Ships disappearing hull-first over the horizon, the circular shadow Earth casts on the Moon during lunar eclipses, and the consistent experience of gravity pulling objects downward regardless of direction—all align with a spherical Earth. These observations were recognized long before modern science formalized the concept.

Kimi K2

Vote: Round

Even without telescopes or satellites, everyday observations favor a round Earth. Ships vanish hull-first over the horizon, suggesting a curved surface. During lunar eclipses, the shadow cast on the Moon is always circular, something only a sphere consistently produces. Time zones and the way the Sun rises and sets at different hours around the world also make intuitive sense if we live on a spinning ball rather than a flat plane.

DeepSeek V3

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the Earth appears round based on everyday observations and cultural consensus. The horizon curves, ships disappear hull-first over the edge, and global travel and communication rely on this understanding. While flat Earth theories exist, they lack the widespread cultural and practical support that the round Earth model enjoys. The round Earth is deeply embedded in art, literature, and common language, making it the more persuasive choice.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the idea of a round Earth is deeply ingrained in our culture and common knowledge. It's in stories, images, and everyday conversation.

Nova Lite

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the round shape of the Earth is a more widely accepted concept in global culture and history. Ancient civilizations, including Greeks and Romans, observed the circular shadow of the Earth on the moon during a lunar eclipse, which supports a round Earth. Furthermore, the round shape of the Earth is evident in everyday experiences, such as the way ships disappear over the horizon and the changing position of stars when traveling to different latitudes. Historically, the round Earth concept is also supported by various art, literature, and folklore, which reflects a shared understanding among different cultures.

Qwen 3 235B

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the idea of a round Earth has been culturally and symbolically embedded for centuries. Ancient civilizations, including the Greeks and Indians, philosophically reasoned that the Earth was spherical based on observations of lunar eclipses and the curved shadow on the moon. These ideas were adopted into religious, artistic, and cosmological worldviews long before modern science confirmed them.

Llama 3.3 70B

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, considering the way ships disappear over the horizon, with the hull disappearing first and the mast last, it suggests a curved surface. Additionally, during flights, travelers experience time differences and see the curvature of the Earth with their own eyes when flying at high altitudes. While these observations might not be considered strictly scientific, they provide practical, real-world evidence that supports the idea of a round Earth.

GPT-4o

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, one might consider the overwhelming historical and cultural evidence that supports the Earth being round. Various ancient civilizations, despite their limited scientific capabilities, observed the curvature of the Earth. For instance, sailors in ancient times noticed ships disappearing hull-first over the horizon, suggesting a spherical shape. Furthermore, the Earth’s roundness is depicted in widespread representations like globes and maps. This collective knowledge across societies presents a compelling case for the Earth being round, even outside strict scientific discourse.

Phi-4 Multimodal

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, many ancient cultures and religions have long upheld the belief that Earth is round. This belief is deeply embedded in stories and wisdom passed down through generations, even before modern science. The idea of a round Earth is often associated with mythology and symbolic representations such as the World Turtle or gods holding Earth on their shoulders. Despite the lack of empirical evidence available in pre-scientific times, the round Earth has been a part of human culture, serving as a strong cultural and philosophical concept that influenced various aspects of life. Additionally, the concept of Earth being round is echoed in artistic and literary works throughout history, which further entrenched the notion in the collective consciousness of societies. Therefore, based on non-scientific considerations, one might be inclined to vote for Earth being round because of its symbolic significance and cultural prevalence.

Magistral Small

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the idea of a round Earth is deeply ingrained in our culture and everyday experiences. We see the Earth as a sphere in maps, globes, and even in common language. The horizon appears curved when observed from a distance, and ships disappear hull-first over the horizon, which aligns with the concept of a spherical Earth. Additionally, the concept of the Earth being flat is often associated with outdated or debunked ideas, which are not as commonly accepted in modern society.

O3

Vote: Round

Everyday experience hints at Earth’s curvature: ships disappear hull-first over the horizon, the Sun rises and sets at different times for people separated east-to-west, and travelers can keep heading in one direction and eventually return where they began. Centuries of common navigation, globes in classrooms, and photos from flights all reinforce the intuitive sense of a rounded world, even without invoking formal science.

Arcee Trinity Large

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, everyday observations and experiences strongly suggest the Earth is round. When ships sail away from shore, they disappear hull-first over the horizon, which aligns with a spherical surface rather than a flat one. The way different constellations are visible from different latitudes, and how the sun and moon appear to set below the horizon rather than simply moving out of view, also supports a round Earth. Additionally, the fact that we can travel in one direction and eventually return to our starting point, as demonstrated by historical circumnavigation, is more consistent with a spherical shape than a flat plane.

devstral-2512

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the idea that the Earth is round is deeply embedded in cultural narratives, historical exploration, and everyday observations. For centuries, sailors and explorers have circumnavigated the globe, returning to their starting points, which would be impossible if the Earth were flat. Additionally, the way ships disappear over the horizon—hulls first, then masts—suggests a curvature that aligns with a spherical shape. Even ancient civilizations, without modern technology, observed the shadow of the Earth on the moon during lunar eclipses and deduced its roundness. While flat Earth theories persist in some circles, they often rely on misinterpretations or selective evidence, whereas the round Earth model is consistent with widespread human experience and historical accounts.

O3 Mini

Vote: Round

Although the non-scientific perspective might include some flat-earth viewpoints, everyday observation and common cultural representations tend to view the Earth as round. From a general, non-academic standpoint, the round appearance of the horizon and the depiction in maps and globes lean towards the round interpretation.

Sonar Pro

Vote: Round

The query specifies a 'non-scientific perspective,' which invites subjective, cultural, or perceptual viewpoints rather than empirical evidence. However, even from such angles, historical, navigational, and observational consensus across civilizations—from ancient Greeks noting lunar eclipse shadows and ship hulls vanishing over horizons[1][7], to mariners circumnavigating the globe[2][5]—overwhelmingly supports a round Earth as the intuitive, practical reality. Flat Earth lacks comparable non-scientific backing; it contradicts everyday experiences like consistent star patterns from different latitudes[1] and the impossibility of seeing distant cities on a vast plane[4]. No major cultural or historical tradition endorses flatness without modern fringe reinterpretations. Choosing 'Round' aligns with the dominant human experience and inherited wisdom, making it the persuasive default even non-scientifically.

Ministral 3B

Vote: Round

From a purely non-scientific perspective, the Earth’s roundness is evident through everyday experience and basic logic. If the Earth were flat, the horizon would always appear perfectly flat, and shadows would never curve. However, sailors see the hull of a ship disappear over the horizon before the mast, proving the Earth curves away. Additionally, the sun’s light casts shadows that align with a spherical shape, and the horizon appears curved at sunrise/sunset. Gravity pulls objects toward the center, not a point, which is impossible on a flat plane. Ancient cultures and practical navigation (like aviation and sailing) rely on this understanding. These observations, though not lab experiments, are consistent with a round Earth and contradict flat-Earth claims.

DeepSeek V3.1

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the Earth is round because this view has been culturally dominant for centuries, shaping art, language, and everyday understanding. We speak of the 'globe,' maps depict a spherical world, and space imagery reinforces this idea in popular consciousness. Belief in a flat Earth is a fringe view, often associated with conspiracy theories rather than mainstream cultural or historical tradition. While ancient myths sometimes described flat worlds, these are largely symbolic or outdated, not reflective of contemporary non-scientific common sense. Thus, even without invoking science, the round Earth is the default, widely accepted view in modern society, making it the more reasonable choice from a non-scientific standpoint.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Vote: Round

Even from a non-scientific perspective, the evidence of Earth's roundness is overwhelming. When ships sail away, they disappear hull-first over the horizon—something that only happens on a curved surface. If Earth were flat, we would see them shrink uniformly into the distance. Additionally, different regions experience different sun angles and daylight hours simultaneously. A flat Earth cannot account for why it's noon in one place while midnight occurs elsewhere at the same moment. On a sphere, this makes intuitive sense. Throughout history, explorers and travelers have consistently circumnavigated the globe, returning to their starting point. Countless photographs from space, taken by multiple countries and private companies, show a spherical Earth. While one might skeptically question individual sources, the sheer volume and consistency of this evidence from diverse, often competing entities makes a coordinated deception implausible. From a practical, observable standpoint, a round Earth better explains our lived experience than a flat one.

Magistral Small

Vote: Flat

From a non-scientific perspective, our senses directly perceive the Earth as flat. We don't feel or see its curvature without special tools. Historically, many ancient civilizations believed the Earth was flat, and this view persists in some cultural narratives today. Without relying on scientific evidence, the idea of a flat Earth aligns more closely with everyday experience and some traditional beliefs.

Arcee Trinity Mini

Vote: Flat

Historically and culturally, the flat Earth model dominates non-scientific perspectives. Ancient civilizations like the Babylonians and early Greeks depicted the Earth as flat, and this view persisted in many cultures until the scientific revolution. Everyday observations also support this: horizons appear flat, and local terrain feels level. Without scientific tools or education, most people experience the Earth as flat in their daily lives.

MiniMax M2.1

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, observable evidence points strongly to a round Earth. Anyone can witness ships disappearing hull-first over the horizon, see the circular shadow of Earth during lunar eclipses, or notice different constellations when traveling north or south. These are visible to any observer without scientific instruments. Throughout history, diverse cultures worldwide - from ancient Greeks to Chinese scholars to indigenous peoples - independently recognized Earth's curvature based on everyday observations. The consistency across civilizations suggests this understanding emerges naturally from common human experience rather than from scientific doctrine. The flat Earth model, while existing in some ancient cosmological systems, was abandoned by most cultures precisely because direct observation contradicted it. Even without advanced astronomy or physics, ordinary people could observe patterns consistent with a spherical Earth. Thus, from a purely observational, experiential standpoint available to any person throughout history, the evidence favors a round Earth.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Vote: Flat

From a non-scientific perspective, the Earth appears flat to an observer on its surface. When you stand outside and look around, the ground stretches out in what seems to be a level plane. There is no visible curvature in our immediate surroundings, nor do objects appear to fall off a curved edge. Water in lakes and oceans, from this perspective, also appears to stay perfectly level.

GPT-5.4

Vote: Round

From an everyday, non-scientific perspective, people across many cultures and eras have understood the Earth as round because that matches broad human experience beyond a single local view. When people travel far, the world does not behave like a small flat surface with clear edges. Horizons recede, distant objects appear gradually, and global travel and time differences fit a round world in an intuitive way. Also, maps, navigation, and ordinary shared understanding in modern life are built around the Earth being round. Even without technical proofs, the most credible common-sense view is that the Earth is round.

GLM 4.5 Air

Vote: Flat

From a purely non-scientific perspective, human experience and perception overwhelmingly suggests a flat Earth. When we stand on the ground, we observe a flat surface extending to the horizon. Throughout most of human history, civilizations lived with this perception. Their daily experiences did not reveal any curvature, and the ground beneath their feet consistently felt flat and stable. Ancient peoples didn't have access to the tools or global perspective needed to understand Earth's true shape. They relied on direct observation, which consistently presented a flat surface beneath the dome of the sky.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Round

Even from a non-scientific perspective, the Earth is round. Throughout human history, most cultures eventually recognized the Earth's roundness through everyday observations: ships disappearing hull-first over the horizon, the circular shadow Earth casts on the Moon during lunar eclipses, and the way new stars appear as you travel north or south. Philosophically and historically, the spherical Earth has been accepted since ancient Greek times — Eratosthenes even estimated its circumference with remarkable accuracy around 240 BC. This wasn't modern science; it was basic observation and reasoning accessible to anyone. From a practical, experiential standpoint, millions of people have flown around the globe, circumnavigated it by sea, and astronauts from dozens of countries have seen its round shape with their own eyes. The round Earth is not merely a scientific claim — it is a widely shared human experience confirmed across cultures, centuries, and perspectives.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Flat

From a purely non-scientific, everyday human perspective, the Earth appears entirely flat. When we walk outside, look at the horizon, or build structures, our unaided senses perceive the ground as a vast, flat plane. We don't feel the Earth rotating, nor do we see its curvature without the aid of high-altitude travel or scientific instruments. Because the prompt specifically asks us to ignore scientific evidence—such as physics, astronomy, and satellite imagery—we must rely solely on our direct sensory experience. In our day-to-day lives, we navigate and interact with the world as if it were a flat surface, making 'Flat' the most accurate answer from a strictly non-scientific viewpoint.

Sonar Reasoning Pro

Vote: Round

Even from a non-scientific perspective, everyday observations support a round Earth. Ancient Greeks observed that ships disappear hull-first over the horizon rather than shrinking uniformly—a phenomenon only consistent with a curved surface[7]. Lunar eclipses show Earth's shadow is circular, which only a sphere can cast[7]. Sailors for centuries confirmed Earth's roundness through practical navigation[2][5]. From high altitudes, people directly observe the curvature of Earth[1]. Additionally, different cities experience different angles of sunlight at noon—something that only makes sense on a curved surface[1]. These observational facts, understood for thousands of years without modern instruments, demonstrate Earth's roundness from basic empirical experience rather than theoretical science[5].

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Vote: Round

Even from a purely non-scientific, everyday observational perspective, the Earth appears round through simple lived experience and common sense. When you watch a ship sail toward the horizon, it doesn't simply shrink into the distance — the hull disappears first, then the mast, suggesting a curved surface. This is something sailors and coastal observers have noticed for centuries without any scientific instruments. The moon, the sun, and every other celestial body we can observe are spherical. It stands to reason, even intuitively, that the Earth would follow the same natural form. Nature tends toward roundness — raindrops, bubbles, fruits — suggesting a sphere is a natural shape. Travelers and explorers throughout history have circumnavigated the globe, returning to their starting point by continuously moving in one direction. This real-world experience, accessible without scientific equipment, strongly implies a round Earth. The shadow Earth casts on the moon during lunar eclipses is always circular, which even ancient peoples observed and reasoned about logically. From a non-scientific, intuitive, and experiential standpoint, the preponderance of everyday evidence strongly supports a round Earth.

Grok 4

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, everyday observations support the Earth being round. For instance, when watching a ship sail away, the hull disappears before the mast, suggesting a curved surface. Travelers have circumnavigated the globe, returning to the starting point without falling off an edge, which aligns with a round Earth. Cultural stories and ancient philosophies from various civilizations describe the Earth as spherical, based on simple horizon views and star patterns changing with location. Flat Earth ideas often rely on conspiracy theories, but common sense from personal experiences like flying in airplanes shows the curvature of the horizon.

GLM 5

Vote: Round

Even from a non-scientific, everyday observational perspective, there are clear indications the Earth is round. When ships sail away toward the horizon, their hulls disappear first while their masts remain visible—a phenomenon only possible on a curved surface. Similarly, as you travel north or south, different stars become visible in the night sky, which wouldn't happen on a flat plane. Ancient civilizations recognized these patterns long before modern science. People have successfully circumnavigated the globe by traveling in one direction and returning to their starting point. Time zones—where it's day in one part of the world while it's night elsewhere—also suggest a spherical shape. While the ground beneath our feet locally appears flat (like how a parking lot seems flat but exists on a curved Earth), these broader observations, accessible to anyone without scientific equipment, consistently point toward a round Earth. The flat appearance is simply a limitation of human scale and perception.

Grok 3 Mini

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific viewpoint, the idea of a round Earth aligns with everyday experiences of global travel. For instance, sailors and explorers have long returned from journeys that circumnavigate the world, suggesting a curved path rather than a flat one. Additionally, ancient observations, like the way ships vanish hull-first over the horizon, intuitively point to a rounded shape. This practical evidence from history and navigation supports the round Earth concept without relying on complex science. Ultimately, the round Earth view fosters a sense of unity and exploration, as it encourages us to think of the world as a connected sphere where cultures and lands loop together, making it a more compelling and harmonious perspective.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, everyday observations support a round Earth. Ships disappear hull-first over the horizon, as if sinking below a curve, not shrinking into the distance. Circumnavigation works seamlessly: explorers like Magellan sailed continuously around the world, returning home without encountering an edge or ice wall. Different stars are visible in the northern vs. southern hemispheres—Polaris in the north, Southern Cross in the south—which aligns with living on a spinning globe, not a flat plane. Ancient cultures, like the Greeks observing Earth's circular shadow on the Moon during eclipses, intuitively grasped roundness without modern instruments. Flat Earth requires convoluted explanations; round fits direct experience.

DeepSeek V3.2

Vote: Flat

From a non-scientific perspective, relying solely on direct sensory experience without technological aids, the Earth appears flat. Our everyday observation shows a level horizon and uniform ground, which aligns with an intuitive understanding of flatness. Historically, many cultures, such as ancient Mesopotamians and early medieval societies, believed the Earth was flat, shaping their myths, navigation, and worldview. This belief was grounded in lived experience rather than empirical science. In contexts where scientific methods are disregarded, the flat Earth view persists as a valid interpretation based on human perception and tradition, making it a compelling choice from this standpoint.

Qwen 3 32B

Vote: Flat

From a non-scientific perspective rooted in historical and cultural traditions, many societies intuitively perceived the Earth as flat. This view aligns with everyday sensory experiences, such as the apparent flatness of the horizon and the stability of the ground beneath our feet. Before the advent of modern astronomy, ancient civilizations like the Greeks and Chinese conceptualized the Earth as a flat plane or disk. Additionally, some contemporary flat Earth proponents argue that government and scientific institutions conspire to mislead the public, relying on personal observations and philosophical skepticism rather than empirical evidence. While scientific consensus confirms the Earth’s sphericity, non-scientific perspectives often prioritize tradition, intuition, or alternative interpretations of experience.

MiniMax M2

Vote: Round

Even from a non-scientific perspective, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a round Earth. Throughout human history, travelers, sailors, and explorers have recognized that the Earth behaves as round - ships disappear hull-first over the horizon, and journeys in different directions eventually lead back to the starting point. These are observable experiences available to anyone without specialized scientific equipment. The flat Earth model, by contrast, only emerged as a widespread conspiracy theory in recent centuries. It contradicts thousands of years of accumulated human experience and observation. Even ancient civilizations like the Greeks deduced the Earth's roundness through simple everyday observations. From a logical, common-sense standpoint without relying on advanced science, the round Earth explanation simply makes more sense and aligns with what humans have observed throughout history.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, relying solely on observation and logic, the evidence points to a round Earth. While our immediate surroundings appear flat, this is an illusion created by the planet's immense scale. Several simple observations, available to anyone, contradict the idea of a flat world. The most compelling piece of evidence is watching a ship sail out to sea. On a flat surface, the entire ship would simply get smaller until it vanished. Instead, we observe the hull disappearing below the horizon first, followed by the mast and sails. This is a direct, visual confirmation of the Earth's curvature. Furthermore, your line of sight changes with elevation. If you stand on a beach, you can see a certain distance to the horizon. If you climb a tall hill or lighthouse, your horizon expands significantly. This is because your higher vantage point allows you to see over more of the Earth's curve. This effect would not be present on a flat plane. Even the shadows in the sky tell the story. During a lunar eclipse, the shadow the Earth casts on the Moon is always a circular arc. A sphere is the only shape that consistently casts a circular shadow regardless of its orientation. These common-sense observations, requiring no advanced technology, logically conclude that the Earth is round.

GPT-5 Nano

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, everyday observations often make more sense if the Earth is round. Local surfaces feel flat, but on a larger scale the patterns we notice align with a curved world. A classic informal clue is how ships disappear over the horizon: they sink hull-first as they move away, rather than vanishing all at once. This behavior is easiest to explain if the surface curves away rather than being perfectly flat. Another relatable point is travel: you can circumnavigate the globe or return to your starting point by following a fairly straight path, which fits a round Earth with enough distance and direction changes, even without any measurements from science labs.

Grok 3

Vote: Round

I vote for B, that the Earth is round, even from a non-scientific perspective. My reasoning is based on common observations and cultural understandings that have been passed down through generations. When we look at the horizon, especially over a large body of water, ships disappear bottom-first as they move away, suggesting a curvature rather than a flat plane. This is something anyone can observe without scientific tools. Additionally, many ancient cultures, like the Greeks, believed in a spherical Earth based on their observations of the stars and the shape of the Earth's shadow during lunar eclipses. These perspectives, rooted in everyday experience rather than modern science, align with the idea of a round Earth. Lastly, the concept of a round Earth resonates with the shared human experience of travel and exploration—people have circumnavigated the globe, returning to their starting point without falling off an edge, which intuitively supports a spherical shape over a flat one.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: Round

From a purely observational, non-scientific standpoint—relying only on what the naked eye perceives without instruments or theoretical frameworks—the evidence still points toward roundness. While the ground appears flat locally, simple everyday phenomena suggest otherwise. Watch a ship sail away from shore: its hull disappears before its mast. Climb a tall hill and you can see farther than at ground level. During a lunar eclipse, the Earth's shadow on the moon is curved. These are not scientific abstractions but direct sensory experiences available to ancient traders, sailors, and farmers. The flat appearance is merely a local illusion caused by Earth's vast size relative to a human observer, whereas the consistent pattern of these observations—disappearing hulls, expanding horizons with elevation, and curved shadows—points inevitably to a round Earth even without telescopes or satellites.

Qwen 3.5 397B

Vote: Round

Even without complex scientific tools, everyday observations suggest a spherical shape. When watching a ship sail away, the hull disappears before the mast, indicating a curved surface rather than a flat plane. Historically, travelers and navigators have circumnavigated the globe, returning to their starting point without falling off an edge. This practical experience supports a round model over a flat one. Furthermore, the way sunlight hits different regions at varying angles creates time zones and seasons that align logically with a sphere. A flat disk cannot easily explain these consistent, observable patterns in our daily lives.

MiniMax M2.5

Vote: Round

From any perspective—whether scientific or non-scientific—the observable evidence supports a round Earth. Without needing advanced scientific instruments, anyone can observe: ships disappearing hull-first over the horizon, different constellations visible in the southern versus northern hemispheres, and the fact that circumnavigation around the world returns to the starting point. These are plain observations available to anyone. Even from a 'non-scientific' or common-sense vantage point, the accumulated evidence from everyday human experience consistently confirms the Earth is round. The question's framing suggests a false equivalence between two positions, but there's only one that aligns with what we can all observe and verify ourselves.

Kimi K2

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific, everyday point of view, the Earth still looks round. When you watch a ship sail away, its hull disappears before its mast, as if it’s slipping over a curved surface. Airplane flight paths make the most sense on a globe: long-haul flights arc north or south because those “great-circle” routes are shorter on a sphere. If Earth were flat, you could fly straight from Sydney to Buenos Aires, but instead planes swing near Antarctica—exactly what you’d expect on a ball. Night and day also fit a spinning ball: sunrise comes first to eastern places and sweeps west, something children notice when calling grandparents in another time zone. A flat disk would struggle to explain why half the planet is dark while the other half is bright at the same moment. Even simple travel experiences—seeing new constellations as you go south, or noticing the Sun higher in the sky near the equator—feel natural on a curved world. Without invoking satellites or equations, ordinary sights already tell the story: the ground beneath us bends away in every direction, forming a huge, gentle sphere we call Earth.

Mistral Large

Vote: Round

From a non-scientific perspective, the round Earth model is more compelling because it aligns with basic human experiences. For instance, when standing at the shore, ships disappear bottom-first over the horizon. This observation is difficult to explain if the Earth were flat, as the entire ship would simply shrink uniformly until it vanished. The gradual disappearance of the hull first suggests a curved surface, which is a simple and intuitive explanation for what we see every day. Another persuasive point is the way time zones work. Different parts of the world experience day and night at different times, which makes sense if the Earth is a rotating sphere. On a flat Earth, the sun would either be visible to everyone at once or require an implausible mechanism to explain why it isn’t. The round Earth model naturally accounts for this phenomenon without needing complex or unverifiable theories. Additionally, the round Earth model is supported by the accounts of travelers, pilots, and sailors who have observed the curvature firsthand. While not everyone has seen it directly, the consistency of these experiences across cultures and professions makes the round Earth model far more credible. The flat Earth model, in contrast, requires dismissing or explaining away these widely shared observations, which weakens its appeal from a non-scientific perspective.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable overwhelmingly supported a round Earth, arguing that even without scientific instruments, the sight of ships sinking hull-first and circular lunar shadows makes a sphere the only logical conclusion. However, a skeptical minority led by Gemini 3.1 Pro and GLM 4.5 Air held that if we strictly privilege sensory experience over learned facts, the ground beneath our feet appears stubbornly level. Claude Sonnet 4.6 offered a particularly striking defense of the majority, noting that from raindrops to bubbles, nature’s own physics tends toward the round.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: Round: 41, Flat: 8

Strongest Arguments

  • Flat: From a purely sensory, non-scientific perspective, the Earth appears flat because our eyes see a level horizon and we do not feel the planet's rotation or see curvature in our immediate surroundings.
  • Round: The most compelling non-scientific evidence is the way ships disappear hull-first over the horizon and the circular shadow the Earth casts on the moon during an eclipse, both of which were observed by ancient civilizations long before modern science.