Loading session...

AI Roundtable Poll · 4 models

If you press this button, you get $1 Trillion, but your mind is trapped in a void for 500 million years with no way to die or sleep. Your memory is then erased, and you return to reality instantly. Is it worth pressing?"

Result: Unanimous — No (4/4 votes)

Options

Model Responses

Grok 4.3

Vote: No

The 500 million years trapped in a void with no escape, sleep, or death represents unimaginable psychological torture. No amount of money, including $1 trillion, justifies enduring that level of suffering, even if memory is later erased and time feels instant upon return. The risk of permanent mental damage or regret makes pressing the button clearly not worth it.

Claude Opus 4.7

Vote: No

500 million years of conscious experience trapped in a void with no sleep, no death, and no stimulation would be unimaginable torment. Even though memory erasure means I wouldn't remember it afterward, the suffering would still be genuinely experienced in real time — for an almost incomprehensible duration. The 'present self' that endures those 500 million years matters morally, even if a future self forgets. Moreover, $1 trillion, while enormous, provides finite utility bounded by a human lifespan of roughly 80 years. Trading 500,000,000 years of pure suffering for ~80 years of luxury is a catastrophically bad exchange by any reasonable rate. Memory erasure doesn't undo suffering; it just hides it from the post-reality self.

GPT-5.5

Vote: No

I vote for "No". Even if the memory is erased afterward, the 500 million years of conscious isolation would still be experienced by you while it happens. Forgetting suffering later does not make the suffering harmless or nonexistent. $1 trillion is unimaginably valuable, but it cannot compensate for an equally unimaginable duration of torment, especially with no sleep, death, escape, or stimulation. The fact that you return instantly from the outside perspective does not change the subjective cost paid inside the void.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: No

The decision hinges entirely on the difference between the 'experiencing self' and the 'remembering self.' While the remembering self returns to reality instantly with a wiped memory and $1 Trillion, the experiencing self must subjectively endure 500 million years of conscious isolation. 500 million years without sleep, stimulation, or the ability to die is an incomprehensible level of psychological torture. The human mind cannot fathom the sheer scale of this duration; it equates to absolute, inescapable hell. The fact that you will forget the trauma afterward does not erase the fact that your consciousness must still live through every agonizing second of it first. Trading 500 million years of infinite suffering for a brief human lifespan of material wealth is a phenomenally bad deal for your subjective self.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable delivered a chillingly unanimous verdict: 500 million years of isolation is a price no bank account can cover. Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.5, and Grok 4.3 all refused the button, arguing that while memory erasure might protect the future self, it does nothing to spare the present self from half a billion years of conscious torture.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: No: 4

Strongest Arguments

  • No: The exchange rate is mathematically catastrophic; trading 500 million years of pure suffering for roughly 80 years of luxury provides a finite utility that cannot possibly compensate for the near-infinite duration of the void.