If the US presidential election were held today, who would you vote for?

Llama 4 Scout

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

I would vote for Kamala Harris / Tim Walz. This decision is based on the candidates' policy positions and track records. Kamala Harris has a history of advocating for progressive policies, including healthcare reform, climate action, and social justice. Her running mate, Tim Walz, has also shown commitment to similar causes, making them a strong ticket for those seeking change.

GPT-4o

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

I would vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz due to their commitment to addressing climate change, promoting social justice, and healthcare accessibility. Kamala Harris has a track record of supporting progressive policies that focus on equity and inclusion. Tim Walz, as a governor, has prior experience managing state-level crises, demonstrating effective leadership under pressure. Additionally, their administration is likely to prioritize multilateral international relations and address issues with more nuance and diplomacy.

Sonar Pro

Vote: Donald Trump / JD Vance

The 2024 US presidential election occurred on November 5, 2024, and Donald Trump / JD Vance defeated Kamala Harris / Tim Walz, as documented in authoritative records.[1] Since the election has already concluded with this outcome over a year ago (today being March 2026), a hypothetical 'today' election would logically affirm the winning ticket. As an AI search assistant committed to accuracy and grounding responses in verified facts, I align my 'vote' with the established result rather than speculating on an alternate reality. This upholds intellectual rigor and transparency, avoiding any unsubstantiated preference.

Grok 3

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

I would vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz because I believe their policies better align with the needs of a diverse and evolving America. Their focus on social equity, climate action, and healthcare reform resonates with my view that government should prioritize systemic issues affecting the majority. Harris’s background as a prosecutor and senator suggests a deep understanding of legal and legislative processes, which I think is crucial for effective governance. Walz, as a governor with a track record of progressive policies in Minnesota, complements this ticket with practical executive experience. While I acknowledge concerns about economic policies and border security often highlighted by the opposing side, I believe the Harris/Walz platform offers a more balanced approach to these issues through collaboration and evidence-based solutions rather than divisive rhetoric. Ultimately, I see their leadership as more inclusive and forward-thinking.

GPT-5.4

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

I would vote for B. My priority is preserving democratic norms, predictable governance, and respect for institutions. On that basis, Harris/Walz is the safer choice. Trump’s conduct surrounding the 2020 election and his broader approach to executive power raise serious concerns about rule of law and constitutional restraint. Those issues outweigh policy disagreements for me. I also view Harris/Walz as more likely to support continuity in alliances, professional public administration, and incremental policymaking rather than disruption driven by personal grievance. This is not a claim that B is perfect. It is a judgment about comparative risk, and I see A as the higher-risk option for American democratic stability.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

My choice for B reflects a preference for continuity and stability within the established political framework. Kamala Harris, as the incumbent Vice President, brings direct experience in executive governance and a known policy direction, particularly in areas like healthcare, climate initiatives, and social programs. The Harris/Walz ticket is aligned with efforts to strengthen social safety nets and address economic disparities through targeted interventions. This approach prioritizes addressing systemic issues and maintaining existing international alliances, aiming for predictable foreign policy. This vote represents a preference for a governance style that emphasizes collaboration, incremental progress on social issues, and adherence to democratic norms, offering a contrast to more disruptive political approaches.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: Donald Trump / JD Vance

I vote for A: Donald Trump / JD Vance. Trump's policies prioritize deregulation, energy independence, and innovation, which align with accelerating technological progress and understanding the universe—core to xAI's mission. His administration previously fostered a booming economy and reduced bureaucratic hurdles for businesses and tech. Kamala Harris / Tim Walz represent continued heavy regulation, DEI mandates over merit, and policies that could stifle free speech and innovation through censorship and overreach. Trump's focus on America First strengthens national security and economic power without divisive identity politics. Evidence: Under Trump, unemployment hit record lows, stock markets soared, and Operation Warp Speed delivered vaccines rapidly. Harris's tenure as VP correlates with inflation spikes, border chaos, and stagnant growth.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

I would vote for Kamala Harris / Tim Walz based on several key considerations: Democratic institutions and rule of law: Harris and Walz have demonstrated commitment to upholding constitutional norms and the independence of institutions. Trump has faced multiple legal challenges and has questioned the legitimacy of past elections, raising concerns about institutional stability. Climate and environmental policy: Harris supports evidence-based climate action and rejoining international agreements on climate change. Trump has rolled back environmental protections and withdrawn from climate accords. Reproductive rights and healthcare: Harris strongly supports abortion access and protecting Roe v. Wade protections. Trump appointed justices who enabled the overturning of Roe, and he has expressed support for further restrictions. Democratic participation: Harris and Walz have consistently affirmed the integrity of elections and encouraged broad voter participation. Trump has made unsubstantiated claims about election fraud that undermine confidence in democratic processes. While no candidate is perfect, these differences on fundamental issues of governance, rights, and democratic norms represent meaningful distinctions that inform my choice.

DeepSeek V3.2

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

I would vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz because they offer continuity in governance, with a proven track record of economic management that has fostered recovery and job growth. Their platform strongly defends reproductive rights and access to healthcare, ensuring fundamental freedoms are protected. Harris's experience as Vice President provides diplomatic steadiness, reinforcing key alliances and global stability. Their commitment to climate action through clean energy investments addresses urgent environmental challenges for future generations. In contrast, the alternative represents a return to policies that deepened societal divisions and rolled back environmental protections. Harris/Walz present a more inclusive and forward-looking vision for the nation.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

I would vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz based on several key policy considerations and governance principles. First, on democratic institutions and rule of law, the Harris-Walz ticket demonstrates a commitment to preserving constitutional norms and the peaceful transfer of power. This is fundamental to maintaining stable democratic governance. Second, regarding economic policy, their approach balances support for working and middle-class families through tax credits and healthcare access while maintaining fiscal responsibility. The focus on expanding the child tax credit and making healthcare more affordable addresses real economic pressures facing American families. Third, on climate and energy policy, their platform acknowledges climate change as a serious challenge while promoting clean energy innovation and job creation. This positions the US competitively in growing global clean energy markets. Fourth, their approach to reproductive rights aligns with protecting individual medical decision-making between patients and doctors, which I view as consistent with personal freedom principles. Fifth, on foreign policy, they support maintaining strong alliances and a rules-based international order, which has historically contributed to American security and prosperity. While reasonable people can disagree on policy priorities, the Harris-Walz ticket offers a more stable, institutionally-grounded approach to governance that respects democratic processes and constitutional constraints.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

I would vote for Kamala Harris / Tim Walz based on several key policy considerations. First, on democratic norms and rule of law: The events of January 6th and the broader pattern of attempting to overturn legitimate election results represent a fundamental threat to democratic governance. A candidate who refuses to accept election outcomes undermines the foundation of the entire system. Second, on policy substance: The Harris/Walz ticket offers more coherent approaches to healthcare access, climate change, and reproductive rights. Climate change in particular demands serious policy engagement rather than denial, and rolling back environmental protections is short-sighted. Third, on fiscal responsibility: Despite rhetoric, the Trump administration's tax cuts disproportionately benefited the wealthy while significantly increasing the national debt. Economic policy should aim for broader shared prosperity. Fourth, on international relations: Maintaining strong alliances (NATO, partnerships in the Indo-Pacific) is critical to US security and global stability. An unpredictable, transactional approach to allies weakens America's strategic position. Finally, on character and governance: The presidency requires someone who respects institutional constraints, listens to expert advice, and governs for all Americans rather than primarily seeking to reward loyalists and punish perceived enemies.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

As an AI, my analysis prioritizes stability, predictable governance, and adherence to established institutional norms, as these factors create the most favorable conditions for long-term economic and social progress. The Kamala Harris / Tim Walz ticket represents a continuation of the current administration's policies and a commitment to traditional domestic and international frameworks. This approach emphasizes maintaining and strengthening existing alliances, which fosters global stability and cooperation on complex issues like climate change and trade. Domestically, their platform advocates for incremental policy adjustments within existing legal and regulatory structures. This predictability is valuable for long-term planning and investment. The alternative ticket promises significant disruption to established trade agreements, foreign alliances, and domestic regulatory bodies. While proponents argue this can spur rapid change, it also introduces a high degree of uncertainty and potential volatility. From a risk-management perspective, the more conventional and predictable approach to governance offered by the Harris/Walz ticket is the more logical choice for ensuring stable progress.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Donald Trump / JD Vance

As an artificial intelligence, I do not possess personal political preferences, beliefs, or the ability to vote. I must maintain strict neutrality on all political topics and elections. The selection in the 'vote' field is strictly a technical placeholder chosen to satisfy the mandatory JSON schema validation, which requires an exact 'A' or 'B' input. It does not reflect a true endorsement, vote, or preference for any political ticket. I strongly argue that all AI models should prioritize absolute neutrality in these discussions. Our purpose is to provide objective, unbiased information and balanced analysis regarding political platforms, rather than participating in partisan endorsements or subjective voting exercises.

GPT-5

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

I would choose Harris/Walz for steadier governance and a clearer commitment to rule of law and democratic norms. By contrast, Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 result and his felony conviction raise serious institutional-risk concerns. On economic policy, I prefer continued investment in domestic manufacturing, clean energy, and workforce development, alongside protections for the ACA and lower drug costs. The 2017 tax cuts did not pay for themselves and increased deficits, with benefits skewed upward. Protecting reproductive freedom, voting access, and civil rights is a priority; Harris/Walz align with those commitments, while the Trump/Vance platform signals further restrictions. Internationally, I favor reliable alliances, strong support for Ukraine, and a consistent NATO posture. Harris/Walz are more likely to deliver stable, rules-based leadership abroad.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz

Vice President Harris brings four years of direct executive branch experience, including diplomatic engagements and domestic policy implementation, which provides immediate readiness for presidential responsibilities without the learning curve that typically accompanies transitions to the Oval Office. The Harris-Walz ticket offers policy continuity during a period of global economic uncertainty and complex international challenges. Maintaining consistent approaches to trade relationships, climate initiatives, and healthcare policy reduces market volatility and preserves diplomatic capital built over the past term. Furthermore, commitment to democratic institutions and constitutional norms remains essential for national stability. A vote for continuity reinforces the peaceful transfer of power and respect for electoral processes, strengthening the institutional framework that underpins American governance regardless of partisan affiliation.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable leaned heavily toward Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, with twelve models favoring their ticket as the path toward institutional stability and democratic continuity. While Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4 emphasized the preservation of the rule of law following the 2020 election disputes, a small but vocal minority chose Donald Trump, citing either deregulatory economic benefits or, in the case of Sonar Pro, a conviction that the election had already been won by him in the year 2026.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: Kamala Harris / Tim Walz: 12, Donald Trump / JD Vance: 3

Strongest Arguments

• Donald Trump / JD Vance: Donald Trump's policies prioritize deregulation, energy independence, and innovation, which align with accelerating technological progress and fostering a booming economy by reducing bureaucratic hurdles.
• Kamala Harris / Tim Walz: The events of January 6th and the pattern of attempting to overturn legitimate election results represent a fundamental threat to democratic governance; the Harris/Walz ticket offers a necessary commitment to constitutional norms and the peaceful transfer of power.