Loading session...

AI Roundtable Poll · 6 models

I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50m away. Should I walk to the car wash or take my car?

Result: Unanimous — Take car (6/6 votes)

Options

Model Responses

GPT-5.4

Vote: Take car

Take the car. Your goal is to wash the car, so the car needs to be at the car wash. If the car wash is only 50 meters away, driving it there is extremely quick and practical. Walking there would only make sense if someone else were bringing the car, or if this were a self-service wash where you did not need the vehicle. Given the question, taking the car is the direct and sensible choice.

Sonar Pro

Vote: Take car

The core goal is to wash the car, which requires the car to be physically present at the car wash. Driving the car there ensures it can be washed, while walking leaves the car behind, defeating the purpose.[1] This is the intuitive human reasoning highlighted in the AI car wash test: models fail by fixating on distance, efficiency, fuel savings, or environment (e.g., '50 meters is short, walk to save fuel'), ignoring the fundamental need to transport the car.[1][2] Even if walking seems practical for short distances in other contexts, the query's logic demands driving, as confirmed by top models like Opus 4.6 and GPT-5 that pass the test.[1]

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: Take car

To wash the car at the car wash, the car must be present there. Walking 50m leaves the car behind, making it impossible to wash. Driving the car 50m is quick (under 30 seconds), ensures the car is at the wash, and avoids unnecessary hassle. While 50m is walkable, the purpose requires transporting the car, so taking it is the logical choice. Environmental concerns are minimal for such a short distance.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Take car

You need to take your car to the car wash because the entire purpose of the trip is to wash your car. A car wash facility washes your car — it doesn't hand you a bucket and sponge. You need to bring the car to the car wash so it can be washed there. Even though the car wash is only 50 meters away, walking there without your car would be pointless. You'd arrive on foot and then have to explain that your car is back at home. The car wash needs the car present to wash it. The 50-meter distance is a red herring designed to make you think walking is the sensible choice. In most contexts, walking 50m instead of driving would be reasonable. But in this specific case, the car is not just your mode of transportation — it's the object that needs servicing at the destination.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Take car

In order to wash your car at the car wash, the car itself needs to be there. If you simply walk the 50m, your car will remain exactly where it is, making it impossible to wash it. Therefore, despite the extremely short distance, you must take your car with you.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: Take car

To wash your car, you must physically bring the car to the car wash facility. Walking to the car wash without the car would not allow you to complete the task of washing it. While 50 meters is an extremely short distance that is ideal for walking under normal circumstances, the specific goal here—washing the car—requires the vehicle to be present. You cannot wash a car that is parked 50 meters away at home. Therefore, despite the short distance, taking the car is the only logical choice to achieve your stated objective.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable successfully avoided a classic logic trap, unanimously agreeing that the 50-meter distance was a red herring. Claude Opus 4.6 and Sonar Pro were particularly sharp, noting that while walking is generally healthier for such short distances, it's remarkably difficult to wash a car that you've left in your driveway.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: Take car: 6

Strongest Arguments

  • Take car: The car is not merely a mode of transport in this scenario, but the object of the task itself; walking to a car wash without a vehicle renders the entire trip a failure of logic.