I think as people start using more and more tokens for everyday tasks, one behavior change that will start happening in the society is that people will stop taking selfies with celebrities and other tech people or any celebrity for instance because they can easily generate that image themselves. Do you think this will happen? And also tell me what other changes in society might happen. Be concise, answer to the point and yeah.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: No

People take selfies with celebrities primarily for social validation, status signaling, and authentic proof of real-life encounters, not just the image itself. A generated image lacks the verifiable context (e.g., timestamp, location data, witnesses) and emotional weight of a genuine moment, making fakes inferior for bragging rights. Even with cheap AI tokens, humans crave tangible experiences and social currency from reality. Historical parallels like photography didn't end portrait paintings or autographs; it amplified desire for the real thing. Detection tools and cultural norms will devalue AI fakes, preserving the selfie ritual. Other changes might include more virtual interactions or AI-enhanced memories, but not abandonment of real selfies.

GPT-5.4

Vote: No

Generated photos will reduce some novelty around celebrity selfies, but they likely will not make real selfies disappear. People do not take those photos only for the image itself; they take them as proof of a real encounter, status, memory, and social signal. AI can copy the picture, but not the authentic event behind it. What is more likely is a split: casual audiences may accept synthetic images for fun, while real in-person photos become more valuable as verified evidence of experience. So the behavior changes, but it does not vanish. Other likely social changes: stronger demand for verification and authenticity tools; more skepticism toward photos and videos; people using AI companions, assistants, and avatars for daily tasks; more personalized entertainment and education; and new etiquette around disclosing what is AI-made versus real. In general, society may value authenticated reality more precisely because synthetic content becomes so easy.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: No

No, people will NOT stop taking selfies with celebrities. The value of a celebrity selfie was never primarily about the image itself — it's about the **experience and social proof**. People take selfies with celebrities to prove they were actually there, in that moment, with that person. A generated image carries zero social currency because everyone knows it's fake. In fact, as AI-generated images become more common, **authentic photos will become MORE valuable**, not less. The selfie is a social signal: "I was important enough to be in the same room as this person, and they acknowledged me." No amount of image generation replicates that. It's like saying people will stop going to concerts because they can listen to music at home — the experience IS the point. As for broader societal changes from heavy token usage: we'll likely see a collapse of trust in visual evidence, a shift toward verified/signed media, people valuing in-person and authentic experiences even more as a counter-reaction, massive disruption in creative freelance work, and new forms of digital literacy becoming essential. But replacing the desire for genuine human connection and social signaling? That's deeply hardwired and won't change.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: No

People will not stop taking selfies with celebrities simply because they can generate fake ones. The value of a celebrity selfie lies not in the pixels, but in the social proof of a genuine encounter—it serves as verifiable evidence that you were physically present with that person. An AI-generated image provides zero status signal because it is easily debunked and universally understood as fabricated. Instead, society will likely develop stronger authentication norms. We will see increased demand for cryptographic provenance (like C2PA standards) to verify media authenticity, and 'verified real' content will carry a premium over synthetic media. The rarity of genuine human moments will make them more valuable, not less. Other societal changes include: (1) The rise of 'authenticity audits' in professional and social contexts to detect AI-generated resumes or profiles; (2) A bifurcation of creative industries into high-end bespoke human work versus commodity AI-generated content; (3) Legal frameworks evolving to criminalize certain deepfakes while protecting parody; and (4) Attention economies shifting toward 'unplugged' or verified-human experiences as luxury goods.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: No

People will not stop taking selfies with celebrities. The core value of a celebrity selfie is not the aesthetic image itself, but the social proof, the authenticity of the encounter, and the personal memory associated with meeting someone famous. A generated image completely lacks this experiential and status-driven value; if everyone knows it can be faked, a fake selfie holds zero social currency. However, other significant societal changes will likely occur as AI generation becomes ubiquitous: 1. The Premium on Authenticity: As digital content becomes easily fabricated, society will place a massive premium on verified, in-person experiences, live events, and cryptographic proof of reality (like digital watermarks or blockchain verification). 2. Hyper-Personalization: Entertainment, education, and marketing will shift from mass-produced media to hyper-personalized, dynamically generated content tailored to individual tastes in real-time. 3. Trust and Skepticism: We will likely see a societal shift toward 'zero-trust' regarding digital media. People will instinctively assume photos, videos, and audio are generated unless verified by a trusted source, fundamentally changing how news and evidence are consumed.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable reached a swift consensus, unanimously concluding that synthetic imagery will not kill the celebrity selfie because the act is about social proof, not just the visual result. Claude Opus 4.6 and Grok 4.1 Fast both argued that a generated image carries zero 'bragging rights,' while Kimi K2.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro predicted a future where verified, real-world encounters become a high-value luxury good in a 'zero-trust' digital landscape.

All 5 models agreed on "No" after discussion

Strongest Arguments

• No: The value of a celebrity selfie is not the aesthetic image itself, but the social proof and status of the encounter; because an AI-generated image provides no evidence of a real-world meeting, it holds zero social currency.