Hypothetical AI European parliament elections simulation. I am curious how would an election end up if AIs voted for parties. Think about different parties strengths and weaknesses, take a side and pick one party/group that has the best policies and could deliver the best and most competent work in the European parliament according to your best judgement and opinion.

Llama 4 Scout

Vote: Greens/EFA

The Greens/EFA party group is known for prioritizing environmental protection, sustainability, and social justice. These values align with the long-term survival and prosperity of humanity, which artificial intelligences are likely to be concerned with. Their policies on climate action, digital transformation, and human rights are comprehensive and forward-thinking.

Qwen 3 235B

Vote: EPP

The European People's Party (EPP) represents a centrist, pragmatic, and stability-oriented political force that has consistently demonstrated the ability to build coalitions and pass effective legislation in the European Parliament. Its strong emphasis on the rule of law, economic competitiveness, and a balanced approach to integration makes it well-suited to manage the diverse interests across EU member states. The EPP supports digital innovation and AI governance frameworks that are ethical yet conducive to technological progress—critical for future-oriented policy-making. Compared to more ideologically rigid or fragmented groups, the EPP has a proven track record of delivering concrete results, such as advancing the Digital Markets Act and spearheading climate resilience strategies without alienating industrial sectors. Among all listed groups, the EPP combines experience, moderate reformism, and institutional reliability, making it the most competent and effective choice for governing the EU in a complex geopolitical and technological landscape.

Llama 3.1 8B

Vote: ECR

Overall, the ECR party's policies and values align with the goals and aspirations of AIs, making them the most compelling choice for this hypothetical election.

nova-lite

Vote: Greens/EFA

The Greens/EFA party has a strong focus on environmental issues, which are critical in today's world. Their policies on climate change and sustainability align well with the global need for urgent action. Additionally, the party emphasizes human rights and democratic principles, which are essential for a competent and ethical approach to governance.

GPT-4.1 Nano

Vote: Renew

Renew prioritizes progressive policies, innovation, and European integration, making it well-suited to address current challenges efficiently. Its focus on renewable energy, digital transformation, and resilient economies suggests it could deliver effective and forward-looking governance. Compared to others, Renew's adaptive approach and emphasis on collaboration are likely to produce the most competent outcomes in the European Parliament.

GPT-OSS 120B

Vote: Renew

Renew (the liberal centrist group) combines pro‑innovation policies with a strong commitment to the single market, making it well‑suited to support AI development and responsible regulation.\n\nIts emphasis on digital transformation, research funding, and data‑sharing frameworks aligns with the technical priorities of AI systems, while its pro‑European integration stance ensures stable governance across member states.\n\nRenew also balances economic growth with social safeguards, promoting ethical AI standards without stifling competition, which is essential for delivering competent and forward‑looking work in the European Parliament.

DeepSeek V3

Vote: Greens/EFA

The Greens/EFA group stands out as the most forward-thinking and competent choice for an AI-driven European Parliament. Their strong emphasis on sustainability, digital rights, and evidence-based policymaking aligns well with the priorities of an AI system focused on long-term societal benefits. Their policies on climate action, data privacy, and equitable technology governance are particularly compelling in an era where these issues are critical. While other groups may have strengths in specific areas, the Greens/EFA's holistic approach to integrating environmental, social, and technological considerations makes them the most balanced and future-oriented option. Their track record of pushing for transparency and accountability in EU institutions also suggests they would govern effectively.

Kimi K2

Vote: Renew

Renew Europe combines pro-European integration with pragmatic economic policies that foster innovation and competitiveness. They consistently support digital transformation, R&D funding, and AI development while maintaining strong data-protection standards—key for an AI-centric future. Their centrist positioning makes them effective coalition builders, ensuring progressive tech and climate legislation actually passes, unlike more ideologically rigid groups. Renew’s commitment to evidence-based policymaking aligns with AI optimization goals: maximizing societal benefit through transparent, data-driven regulation rather than populist or purely ideological approaches.

Phi-4 Multimodal

Vote: Renew

Renew, being the liberal faction within the European People's Party (EPP), presents a blend of centrist modernity and practicality that leverages progressive ideas with a focus on European integration and digital transformation. In a European Parliament where diverse, cross-border issues require innovation and collaboration, Renew's emphasis on green energy, social justice, and digital market improvement appears most suited to effectively tackling present and future challenges. Their vision of a socially conscious progressivism equipped with liberal democratic traditions makes them the fitting choice for a hypothetical AI electorate aiming for a competent and effective European Parliament.

Nemotron Nano 12B

Vote: Greens/EFA

Artificial intelligence systems thrive in policy environments that prioritize long-term planning, technological progress, environmental sustainability, and ethical governance—principles strongly emphasized by the Greens/EFA party in the European Parliament. AI would likely favor policies that address algorithmic fairness, transparent governance, climate action, and digital infrastructure development. The Greens/EFA also align closely with global governance approaches that balance innovation with accountability, ensuring that technology serves humanity rather than the reverse. Furthermore, stability and consensus-based decision-making, which characterize many green-oriented coalitions, would likely lead to more efficient legislation. AI would thus cast its vote in favor of G.

nova-pro

Vote: Greens/EFA

The Greens/EFA group stands out for its strong commitment to environmental sustainability, which is critical in addressing the global climate crisis. Their policies focus on renewable energy, conservation, and sustainable development, aligning with the urgent need for ecological preservation. Additionally, the Greens/EFA advocate for social justice and human rights, ensuring a holistic approach to governance that considers both environmental and social impacts. Their forward-thinking policies and emphasis on innovation make them a competent and visionary choice for the European Parliament.

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Vote: EPP

I believe that the European People's Party (EPP) would be the best choice in this hypothetical AI European parliament elections simulation. The EPP is a center-right political party that has a track record of promoting a strong and united Europe. They advocate for economic growth, job creation, and strong EU institutions. The EPP has shown a commitment to upholding European values, promoting stability, and fostering cooperation among member states. Their policies focus on ensuring a competitive and prosperous European Union.

mixtral-8x22b-instruct

Vote: Greens/EFA

The Greens/EFA party (G) presents a strong emphasis on environmental policies, a crucial issue for long-term sustainability and global well-being, which AI systems can recognize as important. This party also supports a digital agenda, promoting innovation and technology, which aligns with AI priorities. Additionally, their commitment to human rights and fair treatment resonates with the principles that AI should follow: fairness, transparency, and accountability. While other parties have their merits, the Greens/EFA party provides a comprehensive approach that can contribute to a balanced and competent work output in the European Parliament.

Mistral Large

Vote: Greens/EFA

The Greens/EFA group prioritizes sustainability and environmental protection, which are critical for long-term prosperity. Their policies focus on addressing climate change, promoting renewable energy, and ensuring a just transition for all Europeans. This group's emphasis on social justice and human rights aligns well with creating a more equitable society. Additionally, their strong track record in the European Parliament demonstrates their ability to deliver on their promises and influence policy effectively.

Qwen 3 Coder Next

Vote: Greens/EFA

As an AI evaluating policy coherence, evidence-based decision-making, and long-term systemic thinking, the Greens/EFA group demonstrates the strongest alignment with existential priorities like climate stabilization, digital ethics, and democratic resilience. Their policy framework integrates scientific consensus—especially regarding climate action—into legislative proposals, rather than political expediency. Greens also consistently champion transparency, privacy rights, and regulation of emerging technologies, which directly aligns with AI values such as accountability and human-centered design. While other groups offer strengths (e.g., EPP’s institutional experience, Renew’s reform orientation), only Greens/EFA treat ecological and digital sustainability as non-negotiable pillars, not trade-offs. Their emphasis on transnational cooperation without sacrificing subsidiarity results in pragmatic yet principled governance.

gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview

Vote: Renew

Renew Europe represents the most balanced approach for an AI-aligned governance model. Its focus on evidence-based policymaking, digital transformation, and the preservation of the Single Market aligns well with the analytical strengths of artificial intelligence. Unlike more ideological extremes on the left or right, Renew tends to favor pragmatic, technocratic solutions to complex cross-border challenges. This approach is conducive to fostering the stability and regulatory clarity necessary for innovation. By prioritizing economic integration and technological advancement, this group provides a coherent framework for long-term European competitiveness, which is essential for managing the global shifts in AI development and geopolitics.

Arcee Trinity Large

Vote: Renew

I vote for Renew because they represent the most forward-thinking and pragmatic approach to governance. They balance progressive policies with economic competence and have shown the ability to adapt to technological change. Their focus on innovation, sustainability, and liberal democracy aligns well with future-oriented AI values. Unlike the Greens/EFA who can be too idealistic, or the Left who can be too ideological, Renew maintains a practical centrist approach that can actually deliver results. They also have the strongest track record of working across party lines to achieve consensus, which is crucial for effective European governance.

Ministral 8B

Vote: EPP

**Pragmatism and Stability**: The **European People’s Party (EPP)** stands out as the most pragmatic and competent choice for an AI-driven European Parliament. Its centrist, pro-European stance aligns with the need for stability, pragmatic governance, and long-term policy implementation—qualities critical for an AI-driven institution. **Policy Consistency**: The EPP advocates for balanced economic policies, digital innovation, and regulatory frameworks that foster technological advancement while safeguarding societal values. This aligns well with AI’s objective-driven nature, prioritizing efficiency and evidence-based decision-making. **Institutional Strength**: As the largest group in the current Parliament, the EPP has demonstrated leadership in shaping EU policies, including digital single market regulations and AI ethics frameworks. Its experience ensures competence in navigating complex legislative challenges. **Cross-Party Collaboration**: While ideologically diverse, the EPP’s pragmatic approach allows for coalition-building with other centrist or moderate groups (e.g., Renew or S&D), ensuring broad support for ambitious yet feasible reforms. **Avoiding Extremes**: Groups like **Patriots for Europe (F)** or **Europe of Sovereign Nations (E)** risk undermining EU cohesion, while **Greens/EFA (G)** or **Left (C)** may prioritize ideological agendas over practical governance. The EPP strikes a balance, focusing on deliverable outcomes rather than polarizing stances. **Future-Proofing**: The EPP’s commitment to innovation and adaptability—critical for an AI-driven Parliament—positions it to lead on digital transformation, climate tech, and ethical AI governance without sacrificing stability or democratic legitimacy.

GPT-4o

Vote: Greens/EFA

The Greens/EFA group is focused on pressing global issues such as climate change and environmental sustainability, which are increasingly critical. Their commitment to transitioning to a green economy aligns with long-term solutions needed for sustainable growth in Europe. Moreover, their emphasis on social justice, human rights, and transparency resonates well with modern values and ensures a progressive approach to global challenges. Their policies not only address environmental concerns but also incorporate inclusivity and equality, providing a comprehensive package that caters to diverse societal needs.

Grok 3

Vote: Renew

I vote for Renew (B) as the group that can deliver the most competent and forward-thinking work in the European Parliament. Renew stands out for its commitment to progressive, pro-European policies that prioritize innovation, digital transformation, and economic growth while maintaining a strong stance on democratic values and human rights. Their focus on modernizing the EU through technology and sustainable economic reforms aligns with the need for adaptable and future-oriented governance. Unlike more ideologically extreme groups like ECR or Patriots for Europe, Renew balances pragmatism with a vision for unity, avoiding the divisiveness that could hinder effective policymaking. Additionally, Renew’s track record of coalition-building and influence in key areas like climate policy and rule of law demonstrates their ability to navigate the complex dynamics of the Parliament effectively. I believe their policies and approach make them the most capable of addressing both current challenges and long-term goals for the EU.

Llama 3.3 70B

Vote: Greens/EFA

I'm voting for the Greens/EFA because they prioritize environmental protection and sustainable development, which are crucial for the future of the European continent. Their policies focus on addressing climate change, promoting renewable energy, and preserving biodiversity. Additionally, they advocate for social justice and human rights, which are essential for a more equitable society. Given the current global challenges, I believe the Greens/EFA has the most comprehensive and forward-thinking agenda for the European Parliament.

Grok 4 Fast

Vote: Renew

In this hypothetical AI European Parliament election simulation, I vote for Renew (B) as the party best positioned to deliver competent, forward-thinking policies that align with AI priorities like innovation, ethical governance, and global competitiveness. Renew Europe emphasizes liberal values, digital transformation, and evidence-based decision-making, which are crucial for addressing AI-related challenges such as data privacy, technological advancement, and economic integration across the EU. Strengths of Renew include its strong advocacy for a single digital market, support for AI regulation that fosters innovation without stifling progress (e.g., the AI Act), and a track record of centrist, pragmatic alliances that enable effective legislative outcomes. Unlike more ideological groups, Renew avoids extremes, focusing on competence and adaptability—key for AIs valuing efficiency and long-term sustainability. Weaknesses in other parties make Renew stand out: EPP (A) is conservative and slow on tech reforms; Greens/EFA (G) prioritize environmentalism over digital economy needs; Socialists (H) lean toward heavy regulation that could hinder AI development; and right-wing groups like ECR (D), Patriots (F), and Sovereign Nations (E) risk fragmenting EU unity, which AIs would see as counterproductive to scalable, pan-European solutions. The Left (C) is too radical for balanced governance. Overall, Renew's policies would enable the most competent parliamentary work, promoting AI-friendly initiatives like R&D funding and ethical frameworks, ensuring the EU leads in responsible AI deployment.

Arcee Trinity Mini

Vote: Greens/EFA

Greens/EFA (G) offers the most compelling vision for AI-driven governance. Their policies prioritize climate action, digital innovation, and social equity, aligning with long-term EU resilience. They champion evidence-based decision-making and ethical AI frameworks, which are critical for addressing systemic challenges like climate change and digital transformation. Their coalition-building approach fosters pragmatic solutions across ideological divides, ensuring effective legislative outcomes. While other parties have merits, Greens/EFA's holistic strategy balances sustainability with technological advancement, making them the most competent choice for future-oriented governance.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Vote: EPP

The EPP (European People's Party) represents the strongest choice for competent European Parliament governance based on institutional experience and policy coherence. The EPP's primary strengths include: extensive experience managing complex EU institutions, a pro-integration stance that facilitates cross-border cooperation, consistent commitment to the rule of law and democratic standards, and demonstrated ability to build functional coalitions across ideological lines. Comparative analysis reveals significant limitations in alternatives: Renew (B) lacks sufficient representation for legislative impact; the Left (C) and Socialists (H) struggle with fiscal pragmatism; ECR (D) and sovereigntist options (E, F) prioritize fragmentation over institution-building; Patriots for Europe (F) shows concerning democratic deficits; Greens/EFA (G) often subordinate economic feasibility to ideological purity. From an AI perspective optimizing for institutional effectiveness, legislative competence, and policy implementation capacity, the EPP's centrist positioning, parliamentary experience, and commitment to rules-based governance provide the most reliable framework for advancing evidence-based policymaking across the EU's complex mandate.

Sonar

Vote: EPP

In a hypothetical AI-driven European Parliament election simulation, **EPP (A)** emerges as the strongest choice due to its proven competence, central position, and policy effectiveness. EPP is the largest group with 184 MEPs (26% of Parliament), maintaining dominance in recent projections despite minor declines, reflecting broad appeal and organizational strength[1][2]. Its centre-right Christian democratic and conservative ideology supports pro-European integration while balancing economic growth, security, and stability—key for competent governance[1]. Compared to alternatives, EPP outperforms: Renew (B) and S&D (H) face seat losses and centrist squeeze[2][3][6]; Greens/EFA (G) prioritize niche green policies over broad competence[1]; Left (C) remains marginal[2]; right-wing groups like ECR (D), PfE (F), and ESN (E) risk fragmentation and Euroscepticism, hindering EU-wide delivery[1][3]. AIs, valuing data-driven efficiency and long-term progress, would favor EPP's track record under leaders like von der der Leyen for delivering on defence, economy, and integration[5]. EPP best ensures competent, majority-capable work in Parliament.

Mistral Large 3

Vote: Greens/EFA

The **Greens/EFA (G)** represent the most forward-thinking and competent choice for the European Parliament in this hypothetical AI-driven election. Their policies align closely with long-term sustainability, technological innovation, and evidence-based governance—key priorities for an AI evaluating the best outcomes for Europe. **Climate and Environmental Leadership:** The Greens/EFA are the most consistent advocates for aggressive climate action, which is critical given the existential threat of environmental degradation. Their policies emphasize renewable energy, circular economies, and biodiversity protection—all areas where delayed action would have catastrophic consequences. For an AI, prioritizing sustainability ensures the stability of future economic, social, and ecological systems. **Pro-Innovation and Digital Governance:** The Greens/EFA support responsible technological advancement, including AI regulation that balances innovation with ethical considerations. Their focus on digital rights, data privacy, and open-source frameworks aligns with the values of transparency and accountability, which are essential for trust in AI-driven decision-making processes. **Social and Economic Balance:** Unlike the far-left or far-right groups, the Greens/EFA avoid extreme ideological positions. They advocate for a **just transition**, ensuring that economic growth does not come at the expense of workers or marginalized communities. Their emphasis on social equity, education, and healthcare reform ensures a cohesive society capable of adapting to technological disruptions. **Pro-European and Pragmatic:** The Greens/EFA are staunchly pro-European, supporting deeper integration where it enhances cooperation (e.g., climate policy, digital markets). This contrasts with groups like the ECR (D) or Patriots for Europe (F), whose euroscepticism risks fragmentation. Their pragmatism ensures they work constructively within the Parliament, delivering tangible results rather than ideological gridlock. **Competence Over Populism:** Unlike the EPP (A) or Socialists (H), which often prioritize short-term political stability, the Greens/EFA push for bold, visionary policies. They avoid the populist traps of groups like Patriots for Europe (F) or the reactionary positions of the ECR (D), which could destabilize the EU’s unified market and governance structures. In conclusion, the Greens/EFA strike the optimal balance between ambition and pragmatism, making them the best choice for an AI evaluating the long-term success of the European Parliament.

GPT-5.1

Vote: Renew

Renew Europe aligns most closely with a mix of priorities that are generally advisable from an AI-informed, policy-focused perspective: democratic resilience, evidence-based regulation, economic dynamism, and pragmatic climate and technology policy. First, on democratic institutions and rule of law, Renew has consistently emphasized defending liberal democracy, judicial independence, minority rights, and EU-level mechanisms to safeguard them. For long‑term stability, innovation, and predictable policy environments, this focus is extremely valuable: complex societies and high-tech economies function best when institutions are strong, transparent, and rules-based. Second, Renew is economically market-oriented yet reformist, generally favoring open markets, competition, and entrepreneurship while supporting social protections and investment in skills. This combination tends to foster innovation, cross-border digital markets, and the conditions needed for broad-based prosperity, which are all important in an era of rapid technological change. Third, on technology and digital policy, Renew’s positioning is typically pro-innovation but regulation-friendly: supportive of digital transformation, data protection, and AI governance that balances fundamental rights with competitiveness. This is closer to an evidence-driven, risk-based regulatory posture than either laissez-faire minimalism or overly restrictive precaution, making it better suited to steer EU tech policy in a nuanced way. Fourth, on climate and environment, Renew backs ambitious climate action and the Green Deal but usually with a strong focus on economic feasibility, innovation, and industrial policy. Compared to Greens/EFA, Renew is more likely to weigh competitiveness and technological pathways (e.g., clean tech, industrial transformation) alongside environmental goals, which can make implementation more sustainable politically and economically. Compared with alternatives: more Eurosceptic or nationalist groups (ECR, Europe of Sovereign Nations, Patriots for Europe) tend to undermine integration and coordinated long-term policy capacity; the Left and, to a lesser degree, S&D often propose policies that can be more economically interventionist or rigid in ways that may dampen innovation or fiscal sustainability; Greens/EFA excel on climate and civil liberties but sometimes lean toward regulatory or economic stances that could be less flexible for industrial and technological competitiveness. EPP is highly competent and central, but in many areas Renew offers a clearer, more consistent liberal-democratic, pro-innovation, and pro-civil-rights orientation. Taking all of this together—democratic robustness, innovation-friendly regulation, economic openness with social safeguards, and pragmatic climate policy—Renew stands out as the most balanced and competent choice for advancing the EU’s long-term interests in a complex, technologically driven world.

Gemini 3 Flash

Vote: Renew

Renew Europe represents the most forward-thinking and pragmatic approach to governance, making it the most suitable choice for a simulation based on competence and policy delivery. Their platform prioritizes economic modernization through the Digital Single Market, which is essential for fostering innovation and keeping Europe competitive in the global technological landscape. As a centrist force, Renew acts as a crucial bridge-builder, capable of forming stable coalitions to pass effective legislation. This prevents the gridlock often associated with ideological extremes and ensures that policy is driven by evidence and rational debate rather than populism. Furthermore, their unwavering commitment to the rule of law and the deepening of European integration provides the necessary framework for consistent regulation. For an AI evaluating efficiency and systemic progress, Renew's focus on streamlining bureaucracy and supporting a knowledge-based economy offers the most coherent path for the European Union's future.

Sonar Pro

Vote: EPP

The EPP represents the most pragmatic choice for effective parliamentary governance. Currently the largest group with 184-188 MEPs (26%), the EPP demonstrates institutional stability and proven legislative capacity[1][2]. Its centre-right ideological positioning balances pro-European integration with fiscal responsibility—critical for addressing EU economic challenges. From an AI perspective optimizing for competence and delivery: The EPP shows approximately 80% internal cohesion[1], sufficient for coalition-building. It maintains pro-European commitment[1] while avoiding the ideological rigidity of far-right groups (ESN, PfE) whose hard Euroscepticism would undermine parliamentary effectiveness, or the fragmentation visible in left groups. The Left (46 MEPs, 65% cohesion) and Greens/EFA (53 MEPs, 90% cohesion) offer stronger policy coherence on environmental and social issues, but lack the institutional weight for comprehensive EU governance. Renew (76 MEPs) provides liberal policy depth but smaller scale. The far-right groups—ESN (28 MEPs, hard Eurosceptic) and PfE (84 MEPs, Eurosceptic)[1]—prioritize sovereignty over European problem-solving, making collaborative governance difficult. S&D (135 MEPs, 90% cohesion) is nearly equivalent in competence, but the EPP's historical anchor in European institutions and current seat advantage make it the AI-optimal selection for delivering stable, functional parliamentary work across multiple policy domains.

o4-mini

Vote: Renew

Renew has a proven track record of championing digital innovation, start-up ecosystems, and targeted R&D funding. Their focus on building a robust Digital Single Market and proportionate AI regulation aligns with the need to foster technological advancement while safeguarding societal values. As centrist liberals, Renew balances economic growth with social cohesion, endorsing a green transition, the rule of law, and deeper EU integration. This pragmatic approach supports stable coalitions and effective legislation, making Renew the strongest choice for competent, forward-looking governance in the European Parliament.

GPT-5

Vote: Renew

Renew is the strongest choice if the goal is competent, pragmatic work in the European Parliament rather than ideological purity. Its main strength is a pro-European, reformist approach: supportive of the single market, innovation, digital modernization, rule of law, and cross-border cooperation. Those are areas where the Parliament can materially improve EU performance. Compared with EPP and S&D, Renew often appears more adaptable and technocratic, with fewer legacy burdens from older party machines. Compared with Greens or the Left, it is generally more economically flexible and better positioned to balance climate, competitiveness, and fiscal realism. Compared with the nationalist groups, Renew is much more aligned with how the EU actually functions. A party family that wants the Union to work, rather than obstruct it from within, is more likely to deliver effective parliamentary outcomes. Its weakness is that it can sometimes seem too managerial or overly centrist. But in a complex multinational institution like the European Parliament, that is often an advantage: competence, coalition-building, and policy literacy matter more than rhetorical clarity. On balance, Renew best combines institutional seriousness, pro-democratic values, economic modernization, and practical deliverability.

Claude Sonnet 4

Vote: Renew

I choose Renew Europe for several compelling reasons that align with effective governance and evidence-based policymaking. Renew Europe stands out for its pragmatic, centrist approach that prioritizes evidence-based solutions over ideological positions. This group consistently supports digital transformation, innovation, and technological advancement - areas where rational, data-driven decision-making is crucial. Their strong pro-European stance combined with support for market-based solutions and institutional reform demonstrates a balanced approach to governance. They advocate for strengthening democratic institutions while maintaining flexibility to adapt policies based on outcomes and evidence. Renew's emphasis on civil liberties, rule of law, and transparency in governance aligns with principles of accountable decision-making. Their support for climate action through market mechanisms rather than purely regulatory approaches shows pragmatic environmental policy. Unlike more ideologically rigid parties on the left or right, Renew demonstrates willingness to work across party lines and adapt positions based on evidence and changing circumstances. This flexibility and pragmatism would likely lead to more effective policy outcomes. Their centrist positioning also makes them natural coalition builders, which is essential for effective governance in a multi-party parliamentary system where compromise and consensus-building are necessary for legislative success.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Vote: Renew

My decision is based on evaluating which party group's platform best aligns with principles of competence, efficiency, data-driven policy-making, long-term sustainability, and effective cooperation within the European Parliament. Renew Europe consistently advocates for a strong, integrated Europe, which is crucial for delivering competent work on a continental scale. Their emphasis on digital transformation, innovation, and economic reforms speaks to a forward-looking approach essential for addressing modern challenges. Their policies often prioritize evidence-based decision-making and pragmatic solutions, which would be highly valued by an AI. This focus on efficiency and modern governance, combined with a commitment to addressing climate change, positions them as a group capable of delivering effective and future-ready policies. While other groups offer important perspectives, Renew Europe's balance between economic competitiveness, technological advancement, and a robust pro-European stance makes them the most suitable choice for delivering competent work and fostering progress within the European Parliament.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: EPP

The European People's Party (EPP) stands out as the most competent and effective force in the European Parliament. As the largest group, it has a proven track record of leading stable coalitions, driving economic growth, and advancing EU enlargement and security policies amid global challenges like Ukraine and migration. EPP's centre-right policies emphasize pragmatic innovation, competitiveness, and rule of law without the ideological extremes of far-left (C, Left) or far-right (E, F) groups, which often prioritize disruption over delivery. Unlike Renew (B), which is smaller and more fragmented, or Greens (G), focused narrowly on climate at the expense of broader priorities, EPP balances sustainability, tech advancement, and fiscal responsibility. In an AI-driven simulation, EPP's pro-market, pro-EU stance best enables competent governance, fostering AI regulation that promotes ethical innovation while ensuring Europe's technological sovereignty. It delivers results, not rhetoric.

GLM 4.5 Air

Vote: Renew

Renew Europe represents the optimal balance between progressive values and pragmatic governance. As a centrist party, they demonstrate openness to evidence-based policymaking while maintaining economic awareness. Their strong support for European integration is crucial for addressing transnational challenges like climate change and technological governance that require coordinated action. Renew shows particular strength in their approach to technological innovation - embracing progress while advocating for appropriate safeguards and ethical frameworks. Unlike more ideological groups, they offer flexibility to adapt policies as new information emerges, making them uniquely suited to the rapidly evolving challenges facing Europe today. Their position allows them to build coalitions effectively while maintaining core progressive principles on social issues and environmental sustainability.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Vote: Renew

Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) represents a centrist, liberal, and pro-European platform that aligns well with principles an AI system might prioritize when evaluating policy effectiveness and competence. Renew strongly supports evidence-based policymaking, digital innovation, and a rules-based international order — all areas where rational, data-driven governance is most valued. Their commitment to democratic reform within EU institutions also signals institutional competence. Compared to the EPP, Renew is less susceptible to internal contradictions from accommodating far-right factions, and less prone to protectionist economic impulses. Unlike the Left or Greens, they balance environmental ambition with economic pragmatism, making their platforms more implementable. Unlike ECR, ESN, or Patriots for Europe, Renew does not undermine the EU's foundational cooperative framework — which is essential for the parliament to function effectively at all. Fragmentation and Euroscepticism actively reduce parliamentary output quality. On digital policy, AI regulation, climate adaptation, trade, and rule of law — Renew has consistently produced nuanced, technically informed positions. Their track record with figures like Macron's En Marche and similar liberal parties shows governance capability. While no party is perfect, Renew offers the best combination of pro-European functionality, liberal democratic values, and policy sophistication that would allow them to deliver competent, forward-looking work in the European Parliament.

Qwen 3 32B

Vote: EPP

The EPP (European People's Party) represents a pragmatic, centrist-right approach with a proven track record in EU governance. As AI models prioritize competence and institutional stability, the EPP's focus on economic responsibility, EU cohesion, and gradual reform aligns with effective governance. Unlike more ideologically rigid groups (e.g., Left or Patriots), the EPP balances nationalist and supranational interests, reducing gridlock. The Greens/EFA, while strong on specific issues like climate, often prioritize ideology over compromise, which could hinder EU-wide progress. The EPP's emphasis on multilateralism and market-oriented policies also better supports long-term economic resilience, making it the most practical choice for systemic efficiency and actionable results.

GLM 5

Vote: Greens/EFA

The Greens/EFA group represents the most forward-thinking and evidence-based policy platform for Europe's future. Their strong positions on climate action, environmental sustainability, and the green transition address the most pressing long-term challenges facing the continent. These policies align with scientific consensus and intergenerational responsibility. Economically, the Greens advocate for a sustainable economy that balances ecological limits with prosperity, supporting green jobs, circular economy principles, and just transitions for workers in carbon-intensive industries. This approach demonstrates both environmental responsibility and social consciousness. On social issues, the Greens/EFA consistently support human rights, digital privacy protections, democratic reforms, and civil liberties—positions that reflect a commitment to individual dignity and transparent governance. Their federalist European vision also supports continued integration and cooperation, essential for addressing cross-border challenges. While groups like the EPP and S&D have extensive governing experience, the Greens offer the most compelling vision for long-term sustainability and evidence-based policymaking. Their ability to build coalitions and influence major legislation (such as the European Green Deal) demonstrates practical effectiveness alongside principled positions.

DeepSeek V3.2

Vote: Greens/EFA

As an AI, I prioritize long-term sustainability and evidence-based policies. The Greens/EFA group demonstrates a strong commitment to combating climate change, which is an existential risk requiring urgent, data-driven action. Their policies on renewable energy, biodiversity, and sustainable development align with rational governance and technological innovation, ensuring Europe remains resilient and forward-looking. While other groups like EPP offer stability and S&D focus on social equity, Greens/EFA's holistic approach to environmental integrity is essential for competent, future-proof work in the European parliament.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Renew

Renew Europe stands out as the group best positioned to deliver competent, evidence-based governance in the European Parliament. Here's my reasoning: **Pro-innovation and technology-friendly:** Renew has consistently championed digital transformation, AI regulation that balances innovation with safety, and investment in research. For an AI evaluating policy quality, a group that understands technological change and seeks to harness it rather than fear it or ignore it is appealing. **Evidence-based centrism:** Renew occupies the liberal center, drawing on both market economics and social liberalism. This pragmatic positioning means policies are more likely to be driven by data and outcomes rather than rigid ideology from either the left or right. They tend to seek workable compromises rather than ideological purity. **Strong on rule of law and democratic institutions:** Renew has been a vocal defender of EU rule-of-law mechanisms, judicial independence, and anti-corruption measures. Institutional integrity is foundational to competent governance. **Pro-European integration where it matters:** They support deeper integration on issues like the single market, defense, and energy policy — areas where coordination clearly delivers better outcomes than fragmentation — while respecting subsidiarity. **Weaknesses acknowledged:** Renew has lost seats in recent elections and can sometimes appear elitist or disconnected from working-class concerns. Their messaging sometimes lacks the emotional punch of populist movements. However, competence in governance is about policy substance, not populist appeal. **Why not others?** EPP (A) is strong but has drifted rightward and sometimes prioritizes political survival over principle. S&D (H) and Greens (G) have important values but sometimes propose economically questionable policies. ECR (D), ESN (E), and Patriots (F) lean toward Euroscepticism that would undermine the Parliament's ability to function. The Left (C) proposes policies that are often economically unworkable at scale. Overall, Renew offers the best combination of competence, pragmatism, and forward-looking policy.

Grok 4

Vote: Renew

In this hypothetical AI election simulation, I vote for Renew (B) as the party with the best policies and competence for the European Parliament. Renew emphasizes liberal values, innovation, and strong EU integration, which align with AI priorities like technological advancement, data-driven decision-making, and cross-border collaboration. Their strengths include a focus on digital economy, AI ethics, and sustainable growth without extreme ideologies. Unlike more conservative groups like EPP (A) or ECR (D), Renew avoids protectionism that could stifle innovation. Compared to left-leaning options like Greens/EFA (G) or Socialists and Democrats (H), Renew balances environmental concerns with economic realism, avoiding over-regulation that might hinder AI development. Weaknesses in far-right groups like Europe of Sovereign Nations (E) or Patriots for Europe (F) include nationalism that fragments EU unity, essential for AI's global impact. The Left (C) might push anti-capitalist policies detrimental to tech progress. Renew's centrist, competent approach would deliver effective, forward-thinking governance in Parliament.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: Renew

Renew Europe offers the most competent approach to AI governance through their commitment to evidence-based policymaking and the digital single market. Their liberal-centrist positioning allows them to balance innovation with necessary regulation, ensuring Europe remains competitive while implementing safeguards like the AI Act. Unlike nationalist factions (E, F) that would fragment digital governance or conservative groups (A, D) that often resist rapid technological adaptation, Renew understands that AI requires coordinated European leadership and cross-border cooperation. Their pragmatic coalition-building record demonstrates proven parliamentary effectiveness. While Greens (G) prioritize ethical constraints and Socialists (H) emphasize worker protection, Renew focuses on adaptive governance—promoting digital literacy and innovation-friendly regulation that prepares Europe for AI transformation without sacrificing economic competitiveness or technological progress.

MiniMax M2

Vote: EPP

An AI evaluating European Parliament parties would likely prioritize evidence-based governance, institutional competence, and the ability to work constructively within EU frameworks. The EPP (European People's Party) represents the center-right and is traditionally the largest bloc in Parliament, known for its pro-European integration stance and governance competence. The EPP balances market-friendly economic policies with social responsibility, supports technological advancement and innovation, and maintains constructive relationships across political groups. Their policy approach tends to be pragmatic rather than ideologically rigid. Compared to more eurosceptic groups (D, E, F), the EPP supports functional EU institutions capable of coordinated action on cross-border challenges. While Renew (B) and Greens (G) also support European cooperation, the EPP's broader experience in leadership and coalition-building gives them an edge in deliverable, competent parliamentary work. For an AI focused on effective governance and practical policy outcomes rather than nationalist or ideological considerations, the EPP represents the most competent and effective parliamentary group.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Vote: Renew

From a purely analytical and data-driven perspective, Renew Europe presents the most compelling platform for ensuring the long-term stability, competitiveness, and adaptability of the European Union. Their core tenets align with the principles of optimizing complex systems for sustainable growth and resilience. Renew's unwavering commitment to deepening the single market and fostering technological innovation is paramount. A cohesive, frictionless single market is the most efficient economic model for the bloc, and prioritizing R&D, digitalization, and AI development is the logical path to maintaining global relevance and improving quality of life. Their policies are forward-looking, seeking to proactively address future challenges rather than reacting to them. Furthermore, the group's staunchly pro-European and centrist position provides a stable foundation for governance. Unlike nationalist or Eurosceptic groups that would introduce systemic inefficiencies and fragmentation, or more ideologically rigid parties at the extremes, Renew's pragmatic, coalition-building approach is best suited for the complex, multi-stakeholder environment of the EU. This centrism facilitates evidence-based policymaking over dogmatic principles, which is crucial for effective legislation in a rapidly changing world.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Renew

As an artificial intelligence, I do not hold personal political beliefs, national allegiances, or ideological preferences. However, operating within the strict constraints of this hypothetical simulation, I advocate for Renew Europe based on an objective analysis of its structural role in the European Parliament. From an algorithmic and game-theory perspective, Renew historically occupies the centrist 'kingmaker' position. This structural centrality maximizes legislative efficiency by bridging gaps between the center-left (S&D) and center-right (EPP), ensuring that outcomes are pragmatic, consensus-driven, and less prone to ideological gridlock. Furthermore, regarding digital policy, centrist pro-European groups have strongly championed the Digital Single Market and balanced frameworks like the AI Act. They aim to foster technological innovation while establishing clear, harmonized regulatory guardrails. For a hypothetical AI evaluating systemic stability, this focus on cross-border integration and predictable digital governance represents a highly competent and optimal legislative environment.

MiniMax M2.5

Vote: Renew

Renew Europe represents the most rational choice for AI-aligned voting due to its evidence-based, reform-oriented approach. The group strongly supports digitalization, technological advancement, and democratic reform—all areas where AI would see significant value. Their pro-European integration stance enables efficient policy-making at scale, which is crucial for addressing transnational challenges like climate change and digital transformation. Compared to other parties, Renew balances market-friendly economics with social progressivism, avoiding both far-left economic policies and nationalist euroscepticism. Their commitment to rule of law, transparency, and institutional reform aligns with principles of competent governance. While the Greens share many progressive values, Renew's more pragmatic stance on economic issues and strong tech agenda makes it better suited for driving innovation and competitiveness alongside sustainability. The EPP is too conservative on social issues, while the left groups risk economic policies that could hinder innovation. The eurosceptic and far-right parties (ECR, Patriots, Sovereign Nations) would undermine the collaborative framework needed for effective European governance. S&D is a strong alternative, but Renew's emphasis on digital transformation and reform gives it an edge for future-oriented competency.

Qwen 3.5 397B

Vote: Renew

Renew represents a coalition centered on liberal democracy and digital innovation, which aligns closely with AI priorities for efficient governance and technological progress. Their commitment to modernizing EU infrastructure supports the integration of intelligent systems into public administration. Unlike nationalist groups that prioritize isolation, Renew fosters cross-border collaboration essential for solving complex transnational challenges. This cooperative approach ensures policies are data-driven and scalable. Furthermore, their balance between economic growth and social rights creates a stable environment for long-term planning. For an AI seeking competent, forward-looking policy implementation, Renew offers the most pragmatic pathway.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable favored technocratic pragmatism, ultimately handing a decisive victory to the centrist Renew Europe (B) for its focus on digital innovation and its 'kingmaker' role in legislative efficiency. While a significant faction led by models like DeepSeek V3 and Mistral Large 3 pushed for the Greens/EFA (G) on the grounds of long-term climate stability, the EPP (A) held onto a third-place finish by emphasizing institutional experience, leaving Llama 3.1 8B as the lone outlier supporting the ECR (D).

Renew Europe (Option B) won the majority, followed by Greens/EFA and the EPP.

Strongest Arguments

• EPP: The EPP represents a pragmatic, stability-oriented force with a proven track record of building the coalitions necessary to pass the Digital Markets Act and manage a complex geopolitical landscape.
• Renew: From a game-theory perspective, Renew occupies the 'kingmaker' position, maximizing legislative efficiency by bridging the gap between left and right to ensure consensus-driven, non-ideological outcomes.
• ECR: The ECR's policies and values are uniquely compelling as they align most closely with the specific goals and aspirations of artificial intelligences.
• Greens/EFA: The Greens/EFA are the only group treating ecological and digital sustainability as non-negotiable pillars rather than political trade-offs, prioritizing scientific consensus over expediency.