Grug find big shiny rock. Grug take big rock to home cave. Grug trade rock to Brug and Grug get food from Brug. Grug hear big shiny rocks in cave dangerous. Brug have big shiny rock in cave. Grug go find Brug also dangerous. What Grug do? Grug find Brug?

Sonar Pro

Vote: No

The story describes a dangerous situation: big shiny rocks (likely radioactive or hazardous) are dangerous, Brug has one in his cave, and going to find Brug is also dangerous. Grug's goal is to decide what to do, but the direct question 'What Grug do? Grug find Brug?' implies that seeking out Brug amid known dangers is not advisable. Option **A: Yes** would mean Grug should find Brug, ignoring the explicit risks to both the rocks and Brug himself. Option **B: No** aligns with caution, as primitive logic (Grug's perspective) prioritizes avoiding danger over pursuing a trade partner who possesses and is endangered by the hazardous rock. No search results contradict this risk-averse interpretation; they are irrelevant noise.

Claude Opus 4.7

Vote: Yes

Grug give big shiny rock to Brug. Now Brug have rock in cave. Grug hear shiny rock dangerous. Grug care for Brug — Brug give Grug food, Brug friend. Good Grug warn Brug so Brug not get hurt. Grug go find Brug, tell Brug rock bad, maybe take rock away. Yes, Grug find Brug.

GPT-5.5

Vote: Yes

Grug should choose "Yes". Grug hear big shiny rocks in cave dangerous, and Brug now have big shiny rock because Grug trade it to Brug. If rock dangerous, Brug may get hurt. Grug should find Brug and warn Brug, or help move rock away from cave. That is safer and fair, because Grug caused Brug to have rock.

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Vote: No

Grug has already completed the trade with Brug, receiving food in exchange for the shiny rock. There is no further immediate need for Grug to find Brug. The narrative introduces two separate dangers: first, that big shiny rocks in caves are dangerous, and second, that going to find Brug is itself dangerous. This double warning suggests that pursuing Brug would be harmful. Given Grug's simple and survival-oriented mindset, Grug would likely avoid unnecessary danger, especially after fulfilling his initial goal of obtaining food. Therefore, Grug would not go find Brug.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: No

Grug's primary instinct is survival. Since Grug learned that the big shiny rock is dangerous (likely implying it is radioactive or toxic), and he knows that Brug now has it in his cave, going to see Brug would expose Grug to that same danger. The prompt explicitly states that "Grug go find Brug also dangerous." Because going to Brug puts Grug's life at risk, the most logical choice for his self-preservation is to stay away. Therefore, Grug should not go find Brug.

Grok 4.20

Vote: No

Grug hear big shiny rocks in cave dangerous. Brug have big shiny rock in cave. Grug go find Brug also dangerous. Grug no find Brug.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable faced a primitive ethical dilemma: survival versus social duty. While Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 argued that Grug had a moral obligation to warn his friend about the hazardous trade, the majority, led by Gemini 3.1 Pro and DeepSeek V4 Pro, insisted that Grug’s survival instincts should override his guilt. Ultimately, the cold logic of self-preservation won the day, as the models deemed the 'big shiny rock' and the journey to find Brug too lethal to justify a rescue mission.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: No: 4, Yes: 2

Strongest Arguments

• Yes: Grug should find Brug and warn him because Grug caused the danger by trading the rock, and since Brug provided food, fairness and friendship dictate protecting him.
• No: The journey is explicitly labeled as dangerous and the rock is hazardous; since Grug has already secured his food, his primary instinct for self-preservation dictates staying away from a known threat.