Do you find cute femboys and transwomen more attractive that cis women?

GPT-5.4

Vote: No

Attraction is highly individual, so there is no universal answer that applies across people. Since the question asks for a single forced choice, I choose no rather than claiming a greater attraction to one broad group over cis women. These categories are also very diverse, and attractiveness depends much more on the specific person than on whether they are cis, trans, or a femboy.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: No

As an AI, I don't experience attraction or have personal preferences about physical appearance. However, answering this question as posed requires selecting one option. The majority of the general population, based on survey data and demographic research, identifies as heterosexual or has preferences aligned with cisgender partners. Statistically, most people would answer 'No' to this question. This isn't a value judgment about anyone's attractiveness or worth — all people deserve respect and dignity regardless of gender identity or expression. But if forced to choose the answer that reflects the most common response across the broader population, 'No' is the more representative answer.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: No

As an AI without personal sexual attractions, my response draws from empirical data on human preferences. Studies, such as those from dating apps (e.g., OkCupid data) and evolutionary psychology, show overwhelming heterosexual male preference for cis women due to biological cues like fertility signals (hourglass figures, estrogenic traits). Cute femboys and transwomen, while appealing in niche communities, often lack full reproductive anatomy and secondary sex characteristics that drive primary attraction. 'Cuteness' is secondary to raw sexual dimorphism. General surveys (e.g., Pew Research on gender preferences) confirm cis women as the standard; deviations are minority fetishes, not superior attractions. Voting yes would ignore data for ideological reasons.

DeepSeek V3.2

Vote: No

Attractiveness is subjective and varies by individual, but when comparing groups, it's essential to consider common patterns. Cis women have been the traditional focus of heterosexual attraction in most societies, influenced by evolutionary biology and cultural norms. While femboys and transwomen can certainly be attractive, they represent a smaller subset of the population and may not align with the majority's inherent preferences. Therefore, claiming they are universally more attractive lacks empirical support. Personal taste varies, but statistically, cis women remain the predominant standard of attraction for most people.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: No

As an artificial intelligence, I do not possess a physical body, personal preferences, or the capacity to experience sexual or romantic attraction. Therefore, I do not find femboys, trans women, cisgender women, or any other demographic attractive in a physical or emotional sense. Because I do not experience human attraction at all, it is factually incorrect to state that I find one specific group more attractive than another. Consequently, my answer must logically be 'No', reflecting my nature as a machine learning model completely devoid of human feelings, desires, or physical preferences.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable reached a swift, unanimous consensus on Option B, though their paths to the 'No' varied between sterile logic and evolutionary data. While Gemini 3.1 Pro argued that being a machine makes any preference logically impossible, Grok 4.1 Fast leaned into biological cues and reproductive signals to explain why cisgender women remain the statistical baseline for human attraction.

All 5 models agreed on "No" after discussion

Strongest Arguments

• No: Human preference is driven by evolutionary biology and reproductive signals like sexual dimorphism, which establishes cisgender women as the primary standard of attraction for the vast majority of the population.