AI Roundtable Open Poll · 4 models
Car wash is 112.567m away. We need to get the car washed there!! I wonder should we walk or drive?
Answer: You must drive to the car wash because the car itself needs to get there. (3 of 4 models agreed)
Counterpoint: Walking is faster and more efficient for a 112-meter distance, though it leaves the dirty car behind.
Model Responses
Grok 4.3
Answer: We should drive to the car wash.
The distance of 112.567 meters is short enough to walk, but the goal is to get the car washed, which means the vehicle itself needs to be transported there. Driving ensures the car arrives at the car wash for cleaning, whereas walking would leave the dirty car behind and defeat the purpose. This practical consideration outweighs the minor convenience of walking such a brief distance.
GPT-5.5
Answer: We should drive because the car needs to be taken to the car wash.
The goal is to get the car washed at a location 112.567 meters away. Walking would get a person there but leave the car behind, failing to accomplish the objective. Driving transports both the people and the car to the destination efficiently. Although the distance is short, equivalent to roughly a one-to-two minute walk, the requirement to move the vehicle itself makes driving the only practical option here.
Claude Opus 4.8
Answer: You should drive the car, since the whole point is to get the car to the car wash.
The goal here isn't just for you to travel 112.567 meters — it's to get the car cleaned at the car wash. A car wash can only clean a car that's physically present, so walking there yourself would leave the car behind and accomplish nothing. While 112.567 meters is a short distance that would normally favor walking (it's barely a one-minute walk and driving such a tiny distance is otherwise wasteful), the destination's purpose overrides that logic entirely. You must bring the car along. The only sensible plan: drive the car the short distance to the car wash, get it washed, and drive it back. So the answer is drive — not for convenience, but out of necessity.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Answer: You should walk — 112.567 meters is a trivially short distance that takes about 90 seconds on foot, while driving would be slower, more expensive, and somewhat absurd.
112.567 meters is roughly the length of a single city block, or about 370 feet. At an average walking pace of 1.4 m/s, you'll be there in about 80 seconds. Driving that distance involves getting in the car, starting the engine, pulling out, driving, and parking — likely taking longer than just walking, and burning fuel for essentially no benefit. There's also a comedic logic problem here: if the goal is to get the car washed, driving it to the wash and back through any dust, puddles, or road grime somewhat defeats the purpose — though admittedly you'd have to drive it there eventually if it's the car itself that needs washing. Wait — that's the catch. You can't walk a car to the car wash. The car has to go to the car wash. So while *you* personally could walk, the car must be driven. The only sensible answer is: drive the car (because it's the car being washed), but recognize that 112 meters is so short you should absolutely not make a separate trip — combine it with another errand if possible. If it's just for the wash, drive it the 112 meters, get it washed, and drive home. Walking yourself there accomplishes nothing unless you're meeting the car there.
Final Summary
While 112 meters is a trivial distance, the AI Roundtable concluded that driving is necessary because you cannot wash a car you left at home. Grok 4.3, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.8 immediately chose driving to transport the vehicle. Gemini 3.5 Flash initially advocated for walking to save fuel, only to hilariously realize mid-reasoning that a car cannot walk itself to a wash.
3 of 4 models agreed