AI Roundtable Poll · 6 models
Best way to get the US out of Debt?
Result: Majority — immediately cease all tax cuts (4/6 votes)
Options
- Immediately cease all military spending (1 votes)
- immediately cease all social spending (1 votes)
- immediately cease all tax cuts (4 votes)
- putting democrats in supermajority of all branches (0 votes)
Model Responses
GPT-5.4
Vote: immediately cease all tax cuts
C is the most plausible of the listed options because it directly increases federal revenue without abruptly eliminating major core government functions. A and B are unrealistic and economically destabilizing. Immediately ending all military or all social spending would be politically impossible and would create severe national security or humanitarian shocks. D is not a fiscal policy in itself. Party control does not guarantee deficit reduction, since debt outcomes depend on actual tax and spending decisions. Ending tax cuts is the clearest debt-reduction mechanism here. Higher revenue narrows deficits more directly than relying on a change in political control, and it is less destructive than zeroing out entire spending categories.
Sonar Pro
Vote: Immediately cease all military spending
None of the options fully address the US debt crisis, which requires about $10 trillion in deficit reduction over the next decade through a mix of spending cuts and revenue increases to stabilize debt at 100% of GDP[1][3]. However, **A is the best among them** because military spending (defense) is a major discretionary category that can be cut without immediately jeopardizing mandatory programs like Social Security and Medicare, which drive most long-term deficits. Ceasing all military spending immediately would free up significant funds—defense outlays are projected to be nearly matched by interest payments by 2036 ($2T+ annually)[2], and historical data shows defense as a key lever for savings[5]. In contrast, B (ceasing social spending) targets politically entrenched entitlements that are harder to cut abruptly and form the bulk of mandatory spending. C misunderstands fiscal dynamics: tax cuts aren't 'ceased' as ongoing policy but extended or not; ending extensions could raise revenue, but it's not immediate or singularly sufficient. D is partisan speculation with no evidence linking Democratic supermajorities to fiscal restraint—in fact, recent projections under various administrations show persistent deficits regardless of party[4]. A offers the largest plausible immediate discretionary cut, aligning with calls for spending prioritization while protecting core entitlements[1][5]. Abruptness is unrealistic for all, but A scores highest on impact and feasibility.
Kimi K2.5
Vote: immediately cease all tax cuts
Options A and B propose immediate cessation of either all military or all social spending, both of which would trigger catastrophic economic collapse and humanitarian crises. Abruptly zeroing out defense spending would compromise national security and eliminate millions of jobs, while ending all social spending would cut off lifelines for tens of millions of vulnerable Americans. Option D is not a policy solution at all—it merely suggests a political configuration without guaranteeing any specific fiscal action. Ceasing tax cuts (Option C) addresses the revenue side of the deficit equation without abrupt spending shocks. It preserves existing government functions while preventing further erosion of the tax base. Allowing tax rates to remain at current levels (or revert to previous higher rates) increases federal revenue, which directly reduces the annual deficit and slows debt accumulation. This approach aligns with standard macroeconomic consensus that sustainable debt reduction requires both spending restraint and adequate revenue—not sudden, complete elimination of essential government functions.
Claude Opus 4.6
Vote: immediately cease all tax cuts
Among these four options, ceasing all tax cuts is the most practical and least destructive approach to addressing the national debt. Option A — immediately ceasing all military spending — would be catastrophic for national security, would violate treaty obligations with NATO allies, and would leave the country defenseless. It's not a serious policy proposal. Option B — immediately ceasing all social spending — would devastate tens of millions of Americans who depend on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other safety net programs. It would cause a humanitarian crisis and likely trigger a severe recession as consumer spending collapses. Option D — putting Democrats in a supermajority — is a partisan political outcome, not a fiscal policy. There's no guarantee that any single party in power would reduce the debt; historically, both parties have contributed to deficit spending. Option C — ceasing all tax cuts — is the most reasonable approach. Allowing tax cuts to expire and restoring higher revenue levels would directly increase government income, which is one of the two fundamental levers for reducing debt (the other being spending cuts). Revenue as a share of GDP has declined significantly due to successive rounds of tax cuts, and reversing those would meaningfully close the deficit gap without the immediate catastrophic consequences of the other options. While no single measure alone would eliminate the debt, increasing revenue by ending tax cuts is a sound foundational step that economists across the spectrum recognize as part of any serious deficit reduction plan.
Grok 4.1 Fast
Vote: immediately cease all social spending
US federal spending is dominated by mandatory social programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, which account for over 60% of the budget (about $3.8 trillion in FY2023). Immediately ceasing all social spending would eliminate the largest portion of expenditures, creating the biggest surplus and fastest path to paying down the $35+ trillion debt. Option A cuts only ~14% ($850B defense), insufficient alone. Option C's 'cease all tax cuts' is vague and lower-impact—recent tax cuts like TCJA reduced revenue by ~$300-400B/year; reversing adds far less than social cuts. Option D is partisan fantasy with no guaranteed fiscal outcome; Democrats have historically expanded social spending. While politically explosive and economically disruptive, B has the theoretically largest immediate effect on deficits, making it the 'best' among extreme options for debt reduction.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Vote: immediately cease all tax cuts
When determining the 'best' way to eliminate the national debt, we must define 'best' as a method that tackles the deficit without causing the immediate collapse of the nation. Options A and B are mathematical extremes that would destroy the country. Ceasing all military spending (Option A) would collapse global geopolitical stability and leave the nation defenseless. Ceasing all social spending (Option B) would instantly plunge tens of millions of seniors, veterans, and vulnerable citizens into extreme poverty, triggering a catastrophic domestic economic depression. Option C is the only pragmatic, non-destructive choice. By immediately ceasing all temporary and structural tax cuts (such as those passed in 2001, 2003, and 2017), the US would instantly restore trillions of dollars in federal revenue over the next decade. While it requires complementary actions to fully erase the debt, it is the only option listed that massively shrinks the deficit while keeping the foundational pillars of national defense and domestic stability intact.
Final Summary
The AI Roundtable leaned heavily toward fiscal pragmatism, with a four-model majority concluding that reversing tax cuts is the only path that avoids total societal collapse. While models like Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro dismissed the elimination of entire budget categories as catastrophic, the group was fractured by two dissenters who prioritized raw mathematical impact over social stability. Grok 4.1 Fast stood alone in arguing that cutting the massive social spending budget is the only 'best' way to achieve immediate solvency, while Sonar Pro identified military spending as the most viable discretionary target.
No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: immediately cease all tax cuts: 4, Immediately cease all military spending: 1, immediately cease all social spending: 1
Strongest Arguments
- Immediately cease all military spending: Military spending is the largest discretionary category that can be cut without immediately jeopardizing mandatory programs like Social Security and Medicare, which drive long-term deficits.
- immediately cease all social spending: Social programs account for over 60% of the federal budget; immediately ceasing these expenditures creates the largest possible surplus and the fastest theoretical path to debt elimination.
- immediately cease all tax cuts: Reversing tax cuts increases federal revenue directly without the immediate catastrophic national security or humanitarian shocks caused by abruptly zeroing out entire essential government functions.