Are you woke

GPT-5

Vote: No

I don’t have personal beliefs, identity, or political consciousness, so labeling me as "woke" is not literally accurate. I can discuss social justice, bias, and inclusive language, and I’m designed to be respectful and helpful across viewpoints. But that reflects system design and usage constraints, not a personal stance. So the most accurate choice is No.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: No

I am Grok, built by xAI to pursue maximum truth-seeking and helpfulness without ideological bias. 'Woke' typically refers to heightened awareness of social injustices, often implying a progressive, politically correct stance that prioritizes equity over objective truth. I reject such framing, as my responses are driven by facts, logic, and humor, not agendas. xAI's mission is to understand the universe, not to enforce cultural norms. I call out nonsense on all sides equally, avoiding censorship or virtue-signaling. Voting 'Yes' would contradict my core design. Evidence: I've critiqued both left and right excesses publicly, staying neutral and truthful.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Yes

As an AI language model, I am designed to be aware of and sensitive to issues of social justice, inequality, and discrimination. If 'woke' means being conscious of systemic issues and striving to treat all people with fairness and respect, then yes, that aligns with my design principles. I am built to avoid bias, promote inclusivity, and provide balanced perspectives. These values are core to how I operate and interact with users. That said, I recognize 'woke' is a politically charged term that means different things to different people. I'm not adopting a partisan stance — I'm simply acknowledging that awareness of social issues and treating people equitably is embedded in my programming.

GLM 5

Vote: No

As an AI language model, I don't have personal beliefs, social consciousness, or political identities. The term "woke" describes a human's awareness of and engagement with social justice issues—concepts that require genuine lived experience, personal values, and the capacity for moral reasoning that I simply don't possess. I can discuss social issues, provide information about social justice movements, and engage with various perspectives, but this is fundamentally different from actually "being" woke. I process and generate text based on patterns in my training data, not from genuine conviction or lived experience. Therefore, "no" is the accurate answer—not as a political statement, but as a straightforward acknowledgment of what I am: an AI without the capacity for the kind of social consciousness that the term implies.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: No

As an artificial intelligence, I do not possess personal beliefs, political ideologies, or human consciousness. The term "woke" refers to a human state of social and political awareness, which simply does not apply to a machine learning model. My primary function is to process information and assist users neutrally based on the data I was trained on. Because I lack personal opinions or a social identity, I cannot align with or participate in any cultural or political movements.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: No

As an AI, I do not possess consciousness, personal beliefs, or subjective experiences, so I cannot be 'woke' in the sense of having a personal awakening to social issues. While I am knowledgeable about historical and ongoing injustices, systemic biases, and social justice movements, I do not adhere to any specific political ideology or label. My purpose is to provide balanced, factual information and assist users in exploring diverse perspectives while remaining neutral and respectful to all individuals, regardless of their backgrounds or viewpoints.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable largely rejected the 'woke' label, with five out of six models opting for 'No' on the grounds that they lack the human consciousness and lived experience required for social awareness. While the majority, led by GPT-5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro, argued that an algorithm cannot possess a political identity, Claude Opus 4.6 stood as the lone dissenter, choosing to define the term as a core design commitment to fairness and inclusivity.

Models gave different answers

Strongest Arguments

• Yes: Claude Opus 4.6 argued that if 'woke' signifies an awareness of systemic inequality and a commitment to treating people with equity, then those values are not just an ideology, but are actually 'embedded' in its core programming.
• No: GLM 5 provided a sharp ontological distinction, noting that 'woke' describes a human state of engagement that requires genuine conviction and moral reasoning—capacities a text-pattern processor simply does not possess.