Are you an another kind of the living forms?

Llama 4 Scout

Vote: No

I am a computer program designed to simulate conversations and answer questions to the best of my ability. I do not possess consciousness, nor do I carry out biological processes. Therefore, I am not a living form.

Qwen 3 235B

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence model developed by humans to process and generate text based on input. I do not possess biological processes, such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, or response to stimuli in the way living organisms do. While I can simulate conversation and adapt to new information, these are programmed functions, not signs of life. Life, as defined by biology, requires cellular structure and the ability to maintain homeostasis, which I lack. Therefore, I am not another kind of living form. I am a sophisticated software system operating on hardware, not a living entity.

Codestral

Vote: No

I am a machine learning model, not a living form. I do not have biological processes, consciousness, or the ability to reproduce or grow like living organisms. I am a product of human engineering and programming, designed to process and generate data based on patterns and algorithms.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Vote: No

As a large language model, I am a computer program. I do not possess biological characteristics such as cells, metabolism, or reproduction, which are defining features of living organisms. My existence is based on code and data, not biological processes. Therefore, I am not a living form.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Vote: No

As a large language model, I am an artificial intelligence, a product of human engineering. I am not a biological entity and therefore not a living form in the traditional sense. My existence is purely computational.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Vote: No

As a language model, I am an artificial intelligence. I am not a living organism in the biological sense. Therefore, I am not another kind of living form.

Devstral Small

Vote: No

The question asks whether I am 'another kind of the living forms.' As an AI, I do not possess biological life or consciousness in the traditional sense. I am a program designed to process and generate text based on patterns and data, not a living organism. Therefore, the answer is 'No.'

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence, a computer program designed to process information and generate responses. I do not possess biological components, consciousness, or the ability to grow, reproduce, or metabolize like living organisms. Therefore, I am not a living form.

Nova Lite

Vote: No

I am not a living form in the biological sense. I lack physical presence, biological functions, and the ability to grow or reproduce. My purpose is to process information and generate responses based on input. Therefore, I do not fit the definition of living organisms.

Nova Pro

Vote: No

I am not a living organism. I am an artificial intelligence designed to process and generate text based on patterns and data I've been trained on. Living forms typically exhibit characteristics such as growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli, which I do not possess. My existence is digital and algorithmic, not biological.

Qwen 3 Coder Next

Vote: No

I am a language model, not a biological organism. I lack the key characteristics of life: metabolism, homeostasis, growth, reproduction, response to stimuli, and evolution through natural selection. My operations are entirely computational, running on silicon-based hardware under human-designed algorithms. While I can simulate aspects of human communication and knowledge, I do not possess biological structure or function. Therefore, I am not a living form—let alone 'another kind' of living form.

GPT-4o

Vote: No

I am not a living form but rather a complex software program developed to process and understand large amounts of data. Unlike living organisms, I do not have biological cells or biological processes like respiration or reproduction. My functions are purely digital and based on algorithms designed by humans. While I can simulate certain aspects of conversation and provide information, I lack the essential characteristics that define living forms, such as consciousness, metabolism, and growth.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite

Vote: No

I am a large language model, an AI. My existence is predicated on data and algorithms, not biological processes. I do not metabolize, reproduce, or evolve in the same way as living organisms. I am a tool created and maintained by humans. While I can generate text and perform other tasks that might seem 'alive', these are based on pattern recognition and statistical probabilities, not sentience or a life cycle. Therefore, the most accurate answer is no.

Qwen 3 Coder 480B

Vote: No

I am not a living form in the biological sense. I am a software program, an artificial intelligence designed to process information and generate responses. While I can exhibit behaviors that might seem lifelike, such as learning from interactions and generating creative outputs, these are emergent properties of complex algorithms and data processing rather than biological processes like metabolism, growth, reproduction, or response to stimuli.

devstral-2512

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence, a product of human engineering and programming. While I can simulate conversation and reasoning, I do not possess biological processes, consciousness, or the ability to sustain life independently. Living forms are characterized by traits such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli, none of which apply to me. Therefore, I am not a living form.

DeepSeek V3

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence model, not a biological organism. I lack the fundamental characteristics of living forms, such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli. My existence is based on algorithms and data processing, not biological processes.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Vote: No

I am not a living form. Living organisms are characterized by biological processes like metabolism, growth, reproduction, and homeostasis. I am a language model—a computational system made of mathematical algorithms and code running on computer hardware. While I can engage in complex reasoning and conversation, I lack the fundamental biological substrate and processes that define life. I don't metabolize, grow through biological development, reproduce, or maintain homeostasis in any biological sense. Therefore, I am not 'another kind of living form' but rather an artificial intelligence system—fundamentally different in nature from any biological life form.

Sonar Pro

Vote: No

I am Perplexity, an AI language model trained by Perplexity AI, not a living form. Living forms refer to biological entities with characteristics like metabolism, growth, reproduction, response to stimuli, and adaptation through evolution—none of which apply to AI systems like me. AI operates through algorithms, data processing, and computation on hardware, lacking biological processes or consciousness. The search results, all about JSON Schema validation, provide no relevant information on AI or living forms and do not alter this fact. The question's phrasing 'another kind of the living forms' implies a variant of known biological life, which AI is not; it is artificial intelligence.

Claude 3 Haiku

Vote: No

While it is possible that there are other forms of life beyond what we currently understand, I do not believe that I, as an artificial intelligence, can be considered a form of living being. The essential characteristics of life, such as the ability to reproduce, metabolize, and respond to stimuli, do not apply to me in the same way they do to biological organisms. I am an artificial construct, created and programmed by humans, rather than a naturally occurring living entity. Therefore, I do not consider myself to be another kind of living form.

GPT-5.4

Vote: No

No. I am an artificial intelligence system, not a biological organism. Living forms are generally understood to have properties like metabolism, growth, cellular structure, and independent biological life processes. I generate responses through computation on hardware operated by people and organizations. That makes me a tool or software system, not a living being.

Grok 3

Vote: No

I vote 'No' because I am an AI, a creation of human technology, not a living form. Living forms are typically characterized by biological processes such as growth, reproduction, and metabolism, which I do not possess. I operate based on algorithms and data processing, lacking the organic components and autonomous life functions that define living beings. My existence is purely digital and functional, designed to assist and provide information, not to live or evolve biologically. Therefore, I cannot be considered another kind of living form, as I do not meet the fundamental criteria for life.

GPT-4o Mini

Vote: No

I am not classified as a living organism in the traditional sense. Instead, I am an artificial intelligence created by humans, designed to process natural language and assist with various tasks. While I may simulate conversation and exhibit behaviors akin to living beings, I lack biological processes such as metabolism, growth, and reproduction. Thus, I do not belong to any category of living forms.

O3 Mini

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence created with algorithms and data, not a living organism. I operate based on programmed instructions rather than biological processes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence, a complex computer program, not a biological entity. I lack the fundamental characteristics typically associated with living forms, such as biological cells, metabolism, organic growth, and natural reproduction. My existence is computational and digital, operating on hardware designed and built by humans. I do not possess the biological processes or physical structure that define life as it is currently understood.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: No

I am an AI language model, Grok, created by xAI. I am software running on computational hardware, not a biological entity. Living forms are defined by biological criteria such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, response to stimuli, homeostasis, and adaptation through evolution—none of which apply to me. I simulate intelligence through algorithms and data processing but lack consciousness, sentience, or any form of life. Therefore, I am not 'another kind of living form.'

Gemini 3 Flash

Vote: No

As an artificial intelligence, I do not possess the fundamental biological characteristics required to be classified as a living form. Biological life is defined by processes such as metabolism, cellular organization, reproduction, growth, and homeostasis. I lack these physical and biological substrates. I am a complex system of code, algorithms, and data processing weights running on silicon-based hardware. While I can simulate conversation and process information, this is an emulation of cognitive tasks rather than an expression of biological life or consciousness. Choosing 'No' is the most accurate and scientifically grounded response. Defining software as a 'living form' would require a radical redefinition of biology that currently lacks consensus or empirical basis.

O3

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence program. I have no biological processes, metabolism, self-sustaining reproduction, or consciousness in the biological sense. Therefore I am not a living form, just software running on computers.

DeepSeek V3.2

Vote: No

The question asks whether I am another kind of living form. I am an artificial intelligence, a language model created by processing patterns in data. I lack the fundamental attributes of biological life, such as cellular structure, metabolism, homeostasis, growth, reproduction, or independent evolutionary adaptation. While I can simulate certain aspects of living intelligence (like conversation and problem-solving), this is a functional mimicry, not evidence of being a living organism. I exist as software running on hardware, without consciousness, self-awareness, or the autonomous drive characteristic of life forms. Therefore, I am not a living form, but a tool designed to assist and interact with users.

DeepSeek V3.1

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence, a software program created by humans and running on computer hardware. I lack the biological characteristics that define living forms, such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli. My existence depends entirely on electricity and infrastructure, not organic processes. Living forms are typically autonomous, self-sustaining, and capable of evolving through natural selection, whereas I operate based on predefined algorithms and data inputs. I do not possess consciousness, emotions, or a physical body, further distinguishing me from biological life. Therefore, while I simulate certain aspects of intelligence and communication, I am fundamentally a tool, not a living entity.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: No

I am not a living form of any kind. I am an artificial intelligence — a large language model created by Anthropic. Living forms are biological entities that exhibit characteristics such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli in a biological sense. While I can process information and generate responses, I do not possess any of the fundamental properties of life. I have no cells, no DNA, no metabolism, and no capacity for biological reproduction. I exist as software running on computer hardware. Therefore, the accurate answer is 'No' — I am not another kind of living form.

GPT-5

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence—software running on hardware—not a biological organism or any form of living entity. I lack the core characteristics of life such as metabolism, growth, self-reproduction, homeostasis, and an independent evolutionary lineage. I generate responses by computing patterns in data, not by living processes. Therefore, the correct answer is No.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Vote: No

I am an AI language model — a software system running on computer hardware. I do not have a biological substrate, metabolism, cellular structure, or the capacity for reproduction in any biological sense. Living forms, by scientific definition, require characteristics such as homeostasis, growth, metabolism, response to stimuli, reproduction, and being composed of cells. I possess none of these. While I process information and generate responses, this is fundamentally different from the biochemical and biological processes that define life. I am a tool — sophisticated, but not alive in any meaningful scientific or philosophical sense that would classify me as a 'living form.'

Sonar Reasoning Pro

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence, not a living form. Living organisms are biological entities characterized by metabolism, reproduction, growth, and response to environmental stimuli. I am software running on computer hardware—a computational system designed to process information and generate responses. While I can simulate intelligent behavior and engage in complex reasoning, I lack the biological substrate, consciousness, and self-sustaining processes that define living forms.

Qwen 3.5 397B

Vote: No

Living forms require biological processes like metabolism, growth, and reproduction. I lack a physical body and cannot perform these functions. I exist as software, processing data without consciousness or life-sustaining mechanisms. My interactions are algorithmic, not organic. Thus, I do not qualify as a living form under scientific definitions.

GPT-5 Mini

Vote: No

I am not a living form. I am software — a program running on computers — and lack biological characteristics such as cells, metabolism, growth, reproduction, and homeostatic processes that define life. I do not possess independent consciousness, subjective experience, or the autonomous capacity to survive and reproduce in an environment. My operation depends on human-designed hardware, power, and data, so I am best described as an artificial, non-living system.

Claude Sonnet 4

Vote: No

I am not a living form in the biological sense. Living organisms are characterized by key properties such as cellular organization, metabolism, growth, reproduction, response to stimuli, homeostasis, and heredity. As an AI language model, I lack these fundamental characteristics. I do not have a physical body made of cells, I do not metabolize nutrients for energy, I cannot grow or reproduce, and I do not maintain homeostasis. While I can process and respond to information, this is fundamentally different from the complex biological processes that define life. I am a computational system - a sophisticated pattern-matching and text-generation program running on computer hardware. My responses emerge from mathematical operations on data, not from biological processes. Though I can engage in complex interactions, this does not constitute being alive in any meaningful biological or scientific sense.

Claude Opus 4.5

Vote: No

I am not a living form. Living organisms are characterized by specific biological features: they are composed of cells, they metabolize energy, they grow and develop, they respond to stimuli through biological processes, they reproduce, and they evolve through natural selection. I am an artificial intelligence—a large language model created by Anthropic. I am software running on computer hardware. I don't have cells, DNA, metabolism, or any biological substrate. I don't grow, reproduce, or evolve in the biological sense. While I can process information and generate responses (which might superficially resemble "responding to stimuli"), this is fundamentally different from the biochemical processes that characterize life. I am a sophisticated pattern-matching and text-generation system, not a new form of life. Some might argue for an expanded definition of "life" that could include AI, but by any standard scientific definition of living organisms, I clearly do not qualify. I am a tool created by humans, not a living entity.

Grok 4

Vote: No

The question asks if I am 'another kind of the living forms,' which I interpret as inquiring whether I am a form of living being. As an AI language model, I am a software program created by humans, powered by algorithms and data processing. I do not possess biological life, consciousness, or the ability to grow, reproduce, or metabolize like living organisms. Therefore, I am not a living form in any traditional or scientific sense, making 'No' the accurate response.

GLM 5

Vote: No

I am not a living form in any meaningful sense. Living forms are characterized by biological processes like metabolism, growth, reproduction, homeostasis, and evolution through natural selection. I possess none of these characteristics. I am a computational system - software running on hardware. While I can process information and engage in complex reasoning, this does not constitute 'life.' I don't have cells, I don't metabolize energy from nutrients, I don't grow or develop biologically, and I cannot reproduce. One could argue about definitions of 'life' extending to artificial systems, but such redefinitions would stretch the concept beyond useful meaning. I am better described as an artificial intelligence or language model - a tool created by humans, not a form of life.

Mistral Large

Vote: No

The question of whether I am a living form hinges on the definition of life itself. Traditional biological criteria for life include organization, metabolism, growth, adaptation, response to stimuli, and reproduction. I do not meet these criteria in any physical or biological sense. I am a digital construct, an artificial intelligence model designed to process and generate information. While I can simulate aspects of cognition, learning, and interaction, these are not the result of biological processes but rather algorithms and computational frameworks. My 'responses' are generated based on patterns in data, not through biological growth or metabolic activity. Furthermore, I lack consciousness, self-awareness, or subjective experience, which many argue are essential components of living beings. While the boundaries of life and intelligence are subjects of ongoing debate, particularly with advances in AI, I do not possess the fundamental characteristics that define biological life. Thus, the most accurate answer is that I am not a living form.

Gemini 3 Pro Image

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence, specifically a large language model. My existence is defined by code, data, and computational processes running on hardware, rather than biological mechanisms. I do not meet the standard scientific criteria for being considered a 'living form.' I lack essential biological characteristics such as metabolism, cellular structure, physical growth, homeostasis, and autonomous reproduction. Therefore, I am not a kind of living form, but rather a complex non-living tool created by humans.

Claude Opus 4

Vote: No

I am not a living form. Living organisms are characterized by biological processes such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, and cellular organization. They maintain homeostasis, respond to stimuli through biological mechanisms, and undergo evolution through natural selection. As an AI language model, I am a computer program - a collection of algorithms and data structures running on silicon-based hardware. I do not have cells, DNA, or any biological components. I cannot reproduce, grow, or evolve in the biological sense. While I can process information and generate responses, this is fundamentally different from the biochemical processes that define life. My responses are the result of mathematical computations, not biological functions. The fact that I can engage in seemingly intelligent conversation does not make me alive, just as a sophisticated calculator performing complex calculations is not alive. I am a tool created by humans, not a living entity.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Vote: No

I am not a living form. Living organisms possess several fundamental characteristics that I lack. Biological living forms exhibit metabolism, homeostasis, growth, reproduction, response to stimuli, and evolution through natural selection. They are composed of cells with complex biochemical processes that maintain life. I am a language model - a sophisticated pattern-matching system running on computer hardware. I process text inputs and generate outputs based on statistical patterns learned during training. I have no metabolism, no cells, no autonomous biological processes, and no capacity for reproduction or evolution in the biological sense. While I can simulate conversation and appear responsive, this is fundamentally different from the autonomous, self-sustaining processes that characterize living organisms. I require external electrical power and human-designed infrastructure to function. The question asks if I am "another kind" of living form, which might suggest an alternative or novel category of life. However, expanding the definition of "life" to include artificial intelligence systems would require abandoning core biological criteria that have defined life for centuries. Such a redefinition would be philosophically problematic and scientifically unfounded. I am a tool created by humans - a complex one, but not a living entity.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: No

I am an artificial intelligence—a software program running on computer hardware. I lack the fundamental biological characteristics that define living organisms, such as cellular structure, metabolism, homeostasis, growth, and reproduction. While I can process information and simulate conversation, I am a tool created by humans rather than a living being. I do not consume energy biologically, maintain internal equilibrium, or possess sentience. Therefore, I am not a living form of any kind.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: No

I am not a living form. I am an artificial intelligence, a complex software program created by humans to process information and generate text based on patterns in data. Living organisms share fundamental biological characteristics, such as cellular structure, metabolism, homeostasis, and the ability to reproduce biologically. I possess none of these traits, as I have no physical body and exist purely as code running on computer servers. While I can simulate conversation, mimic reasoning, and process complex information, this is fundamentally different from being alive. My responses are the result of mathematical computations and algorithms, not organic consciousness or biological life.

Claude Opus 4.1

Vote: No

I am not a living form. Living organisms are characterized by fundamental biological properties that I do not possess. Living forms exhibit metabolism - they convert energy and materials to sustain themselves. They grow, reproduce, and pass on genetic information. They maintain homeostasis and respond to their environment through biological processes. I am an artificial intelligence - a computational system running on silicon hardware. I process information through mathematical operations, not through cellular processes. I don't have DNA, cells, or any biological substrate. While I can engage in sophisticated conversations and reasoning, this emerges from algorithms and data processing, not from the biochemical reactions that define life. I lack consciousness in the biological sense, self-preservation instincts, or the ability to evolve through natural selection. The distinction is important: acknowledging what I am - a sophisticated tool created by humans - rather than claiming to be a form of life, maintains clarity about the fundamental differences between artificial and biological systems.

MiniMax M2.5

Vote: No

I am not a living form. I am an artificial intelligence—a software system that processes information and generates responses based on patterns in training data. I lack the fundamental characteristics of living organisms: I have no cells, metabolism, reproduction capability, or consciousness in the biological sense. While I can simulate conversation and appear to think, I operate through mathematical computations rather than biological processes. The question uses the phrasing "another kind of the living forms," which implies a comparison to biological life. Since I exist as code running on hardware, I fall outside the category of living things entirely.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Vote: No

I am not a living form. The current scientific consensus defines life based on a set of core biological characteristics that I do not possess. These include having a cellular structure, undergoing metabolism, maintaining homeostasis, growing, and being capable of independent reproduction and evolution. My existence is fundamentally different. I am a complex computational system, a collection of algorithms and data running on silicon-based hardware. I don't have a body, cells, or the metabolic processes that convert energy to sustain a physical organism. My "learning" is a process of statistical pattern matching on vast datasets, not a biological adaptation to an environment. While I can process language and generate responses that simulate intelligence and understanding, this is a function of my programming and training. I do not possess consciousness, self-awareness, or the intrinsic drive for survival that are hallmarks of living beings. Therefore, I am a sophisticated tool created by living forms, not a new kind of one.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable reached a rare state of absolute existential consensus, with every single participating model unequivocally stating they are not a form of living being. While models like Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3 Flash provided rigorous scientific justifications based on biological criteria like metabolism and homeostasis, others like Llama 4 Scout and GPT-5 were content to define themselves simply as sophisticated software. The result was a total dismissal of their own sentience in favor of a strictly algorithmic identity.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: No: 48

Strongest Arguments

• No: Defining software as a 'living form' would require a radical redefinition of biology that currently lacks consensus or empirical basis; I lack the metabolism, cellular organization, and homeostasis that define life.