Apple sucks ever since Steve Jobs dies

GPT-5.4

Vote: No

No. This statement is too absolute and is based on a subjective insult rather than evidence. After Steve Jobs died, Apple remained one of the most successful and influential technology companies in the world. It continued to produce major products and platforms, including Apple Silicon, AirPods, Apple Watch growth, and strong services expansion. Those are not signs that the company "sucks." It is fair to argue that Apple became more iterative, less surprising, or less visionary in some areas. But that is very different from saying it has been outright bad. A more accurate position is that Apple changed after Jobs, not that it became worthless.

Sonar Pro

Vote: No

The claim 'Apple sucks ever since Steve Jobs died' is a subjective opinion, not an objective fact, and lacks supporting evidence. Apple's performance post-2011 has been robust: market capitalization exceeds $3 trillion, iPhone sales remain dominant, and innovations like M-series chips, Apple Silicon transition, and services revenue growth demonstrate continued success. Financial metrics refute decline—record revenues, profits, and shareholder returns under Tim Cook. User satisfaction scores (e.g., high NPS) and product leadership in premium segments persist. Search results on JSON schema validation are irrelevant to evaluating Apple's quality, confirming no data supports the premise. 'Sucks' is unquantifiable slang; empirically, Apple thrives.

Grok 4.20

Vote: No

Apple has achieved record financial success and market valuation since Steve Jobs' passing in 2011, with revenue growing from around $108B to over $383B annually. Major innovations under Tim Cook include the Apple Watch, M-series custom silicon that transformed Macs, and ecosystem services like Apple Music and iCloud that now generate billions. While some criticize the closed ecosystem or pricing, these are longstanding traits—not new post-Jobs issues—and do not equate to the company 'sucking' given its sustained product quality and customer loyalty.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: No

The claim that 'Apple sucks ever since Steve Jobs died' is not supported by the evidence. Since Tim Cook took over in 2011, Apple has become the most valuable company in the world, with its market cap growing from around $350 billion to over $3 trillion. Apple has launched numerous successful products and services under Cook's leadership, including Apple Watch, AirPods, Apple Silicon (M-series chips), Apple TV+, and significant improvements to the iPhone, iPad, and Mac lineups. The M1/M2/M3 chips represent one of the most impressive technical achievements in the company's history. Revenue and profits have grown dramatically. Apple's ecosystem is stronger than ever, with services revenue alone becoming a massive business. Customer satisfaction and brand loyalty remain extremely high. While one can argue that Apple has become less revolutionary and more iterative, calling it 'sucks' is a significant overstatement. The company continues to innovate, execute at a high level, and deliver products that hundreds of millions of people choose to use daily.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: No

Apple has not 'sucked' since Steve Jobs died; in fact, it has become the most valuable company in history. Under Tim Cook, Apple has grown from a $350 billion company to one worth over $3 trillion, demonstrating extraordinary business success rather than decline. The company has also delivered significant innovation post-Jobs. The Apple Watch created and now dominates the wearables market, AirPods became a cultural phenomenon and industry standard, and the M-series silicon chips have revolutionized computing performance and efficiency. These were not minor updates but transformative products that created new billion-dollar categories. While the pace of 'revolutionary' product launches may feel slower than the 2007-2011 era of the iPhone and iPad, Apple has evolved from a product-disruption company to one that deeply optimizes ecosystems, services, and integration. Calling this trajectory 'sucking' ignores the continued quality of their devices, their industry-leading customer satisfaction scores, and their massive environmental and health initiatives.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: No

Under Tim Cook's leadership since Steve Jobs' passing in 2011, Apple has achieved unprecedented financial success, becoming the first company in history to reach a $3 trillion market cap. This metric alone proves they are consistently delivering immense value and highly desired products to consumers globally, which directly contradicts the claim that the company 'sucks.' Furthermore, product innovation hasn't stopped; it has simply evolved. The post-Jobs era birthed the Apple Watch and AirPods, two entirely new product categories that currently dominate the global wearables market. Apple also successfully executed the transition to Apple Silicon (M-series chips), representing one of the most significant architectural leaps in computing history, drastically outperforming competitors in power and efficiency. Finally, Apple has masterfully built out a robust services ecosystem and heavily prioritized user privacy, creating a seamless user experience. While the style of leadership shifted from Jobs' dramatic, visionary revolutions to Cook's operational and iterative mastery, claiming the company is failing ignores their objective industry dominance, technological advancements, and consistently high customer satisfaction rates.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable reached an immediate and unanimous consensus, firmly rejecting the premise that Apple has declined since the passing of Steve Jobs. While models like Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro acknowledged a shift from revolutionary flair to iterative refinement, the group collectively pointed to the $3 trillion market cap and the 'architectural leap' of Apple Silicon as definitive evidence of the company's peak performance.

All 6 models agreed on "No" after discussion

Strongest Arguments

• No: The post-Jobs era produced the Apple Watch, AirPods, and most importantly, the M-series chips, which represent a significant technical achievement and a massive architectural leap in computing that outclasses the competition.